Sportrac says this works but not sure it’s accurate
Atlanta trades to Sac
Kispert into Kings NTMLE
Buddy Hield
Sign and trade Kuminga 16M a year
Atlanta waives Mouhamed Gueye
Atlanta receives Zach LaVine
Why for Atlanta:
Atlanta uses the Kuminga sign and trade to dump contracts and get to 15 guaranteed contracts without attaching assets. LaVine provides an upgrade over Hield whose defensive issues can be covered by Dort and Daniels.
Why for Sac
Sac gets Kuminga at a discount to what they would have paid earlier at a reasonable price. They trade some contract flexibility next year but give Kispert a chance to show what he has got and can let DeAndre Hunter walk
Atlanta Kings
Moderators: loserX, HartfordWhalers, Trader_Joe, Texas Chuck, Andre Roberstan, pacers33granger, Mamba4Goat, MoneyTalks41890
Atlanta Kings
-
Sactowndog
- Kings Forum Mock Draft Champ
- Posts: 4,843
- And1: 2,011
- Joined: May 27, 2017
Re: Atlanta Kings
- Scoot McGroot
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 46,015
- And1: 15,401
- Joined: Feb 16, 2005
-
Re: Atlanta Kings
This effectively adds $20m to the Atlanta books for this year, and puts them ~$17m over the luxury tax. Atlanta is only $3m short of the luxury tax with just Kispiert, Buddy, and Gueye on the books. So, every dollar they sign and trade Kuminga out for (while taking back equal salary) would put them over the tax. And, by taking back more salary than they send out, they're hard capped at the 1st Apron, which this deal would put them around $6m over, so it's illegal.
Dead on arrival for Atlanta. For multiple reasons.
Dead on arrival for Atlanta. For multiple reasons.
Re: Atlanta Kings
-
jayu70
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,252
- And1: 13,839
- Joined: Mar 11, 2014
-
Re: Atlanta Kings
Sactowndog wrote:Sportrac says this works but not sure it’s accurate
Atlanta trades to Sac
Kispert into Kings NTMLE
Buddy Hield
Sign and trade Kuminga 16M a year
Atlanta waives Mouhamed Gueye
Atlanta receives Zach LaVine
Why for Atlanta:
Atlanta uses the Kuminga sign and trade to dump contracts and get to 15 guaranteed contracts without attaching assets. LaVine provides an upgrade over Hield whose defensive issues can be covered by Dort and Daniels.
Why for Sac
Sac gets Kuminga at a discount to what they would have paid earlier at a reasonable price. They trade some contract flexibility next year but give Kispert a chance to show what he has got and can let DeAndre Hunter walk
Anything that puts Atlanta over the luxury tax is a non starter. Currently $3.9 million under the tax (w/o Kuminga). Try again
Re: Atlanta Kings
-
giberish
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,179
- And1: 7,756
- Joined: Mar 30, 2006
- Location: Whereever you go - there you are
Re: Atlanta Kings
Scoot McGroot wrote:This effectively adds $20m to the Atlanta books for this year, and puts them ~$17m over the luxury tax. Atlanta is only $3m short of the luxury tax with just Kispiert, Buddy, and Gueye on the books. So, every dollar they sign and trade Kuminga out for (while taking back equal salary) would put them over the tax. And, by taking back more salary than they send out, they're hard capped at the 1st Apron, which this deal would put them around $6m over, so it's illegal.
Dead on arrival for Atlanta. For multiple reasons.
Also, Heild is the Hawks 5th wing. They've got 4 guys ahead of him that they like. They don't need to upgrade him at all, so this does nothing for them on-court.
Re: Atlanta Kings
- Scoot McGroot
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 46,015
- And1: 15,401
- Joined: Feb 16, 2005
-
Re: Atlanta Kings
giberish wrote:Scoot McGroot wrote:This effectively adds $20m to the Atlanta books for this year, and puts them ~$17m over the luxury tax. Atlanta is only $3m short of the luxury tax with just Kispiert, Buddy, and Gueye on the books. So, every dollar they sign and trade Kuminga out for (while taking back equal salary) would put them over the tax. And, by taking back more salary than they send out, they're hard capped at the 1st Apron, which this deal would put them around $6m over, so it's illegal.
Dead on arrival for Atlanta. For multiple reasons.
Also, Heild is the Hawks 5th wing. They've got 4 guys ahead of him that they like. They don't need to upgrade him at all, so this does nothing for them on-court.
Eh, I just assumed the whole scheme is to theoretically dump the last year of Kispert. But, it's not legal and doesn't make fiscal sense with the tax, anyway.
Return to Trades and Transactions
