The Knicks

Moderators: BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck

Sebzor
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,276
And1: 5
Joined: Jun 29, 2006

The Knicks 

Post#1 » by Sebzor » Wed Jan 2, 2008 11:53 am

NJ-NYK
R. Jefferson/N. Kristic/future 2nd -for: E. Curry/F. Jones/R. Balkman

NYK get rid of disgrunteld curry and add all-star RJ next to Zach-Crawford
NJ improve low-post scoring (defensive big = williams)

CLE-NYK
L. Hughes/D. Marshall -for: Q. Richardson/M. Rose

NYK get defensive SG
CLE get help for lebron in the shooting Qrich

SEA-NYK
L. Ridnour -for: M. Collins/D. Marshall/future 2nd

line-up
PG: Ridnour/Robinson/Marbury
SG: Crawford/Hughes
SF: Jefferson/Jeffries/Chandler
PF: Randolph/Lee
C: Kristic/Morris/James
"So, the caterpillar has emerged from its cocoon as a shark, with a gun for a mouth."
"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
#1knickfan
Banned User
Posts: 3,590
And1: 2
Joined: Apr 26, 2007

 

Post#2 » by #1knickfan » Wed Jan 2, 2008 2:16 pm

I like all the trades to varying degrees except for the last one.
ecuhus1981
RealGM
Posts: 16,895
And1: 1,571
Joined: Jun 19, 2007
       

 

Post#3 » by ecuhus1981 » Wed Jan 2, 2008 2:29 pm

Nets decline really easily. Even without Krstic.

CLE probably doesn't mind their deal, but what do Hughes and Crawford do together (besides suck)?

The SEA deal is actually decent, but if it's a filler contract coming from CLE, they'd prefer Newble. Tha tway, they can waive Ira and not exceed the roster limit.
Some people really have a way with words. Other people... not... have... way.
-- Steve Martin
mab149
Freshman
Posts: 72
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Location: Deng's Bank account

 

Post#4 » by mab149 » Wed Jan 2, 2008 3:39 pm

The nets deal is terrible, when healthy Kristic has almost the same value as Curry and Jefferson is by far the best player in the trade. Balkman has proven all he will be is a hustle guy that comes of the bench for 15 minutes a game.
User avatar
old rem
RealGM
Posts: 50,753
And1: 1,080
Joined: Jun 14, 2005
Location: Witness Protection

 

Post#5 » by old rem » Wed Jan 2, 2008 7:40 pm

I see no incentive for Seattle. The Clev deal is ugly but doable. The NJ deal...closer than the reponses indicate,but NJ got plenty of looks at Curry and he's disturbingly one dimension. If it's Randolph...NJ would be more apt to bite...would need to add fill
CENSORED... No comment.
User avatar
djthesonicsfan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,534
And1: 159
Joined: Aug 13, 2007
     

 

Post#6 » by djthesonicsfan » Wed Jan 2, 2008 8:15 pm

Thanks but no thanks from the Sonics. One less year of salary is not enough incentive to trade a decent, young, veteran, pass first PG.

Return to Trades and Transactions