Some creativity here: Sacto/NY/CHI

Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX

Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

Some creativity here: Sacto/NY/CHI 

Post#1 » by Smills91 » Fri Jan 4, 2008 6:54 am

Just throwing this idea out there. I don't know of any other teams interested in taking on Zach Randolph...and I don't even know if the Bulls would be.

Kings deal:
Ron Artest
Kenny Thomas

Kings receive:
Joakim Noah
Joe Smith
Ben Gordon

Bulls trade:
Joakim Noah
Joe Smith
Ben Gordon

Bulls receive:
Zach Randolph
Mardy Collins

Knicks deal:
Zach Randolph
Mardy Collins

Knicks receive:
Ron Artest
Kenny Thomas
User avatar
treis
RealGM
Posts: 16,668
And1: 60
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

 

Post#2 » by treis » Fri Jan 4, 2008 7:09 am

Kings get too much, but everyone knew that before they opened the thread.

A few months ago Randolph was traded for a bad contract and a marginal young prospect. His value hasn't sky rocketed to Ben Gordon and Joakim Noah.
Image
User avatar
Rugged Ron Ron
Pro Prospect
Posts: 784
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 09, 2006

 

Post#3 » by Rugged Ron Ron » Fri Jan 4, 2008 7:18 am

Kings arent getting Gordon/Noah for Ron and get to dump Kenny for expiring. Get real dude.
Image
User avatar
Rasheed36
Senior
Posts: 648
And1: 2
Joined: Dec 05, 2006

 

Post#4 » by Rasheed36 » Fri Jan 4, 2008 7:22 am

Bulls won't even trade Ben Wallace for Zach. So Bulls say no
IPC075009
Junior
Posts: 399
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 01, 2007

 

Post#5 » by IPC075009 » Fri Jan 4, 2008 7:38 am

I wouldnt even trade Thabo for Zach Randolph.......................

But seriously, no way for the bulls
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 110,861
And1: 26,370
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#6 » by trwi7 » Fri Jan 4, 2008 7:41 am

treis wrote:Kings get too much, but everyone knew that before they opened the thread.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
UKF
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,810
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 05, 2006
Contact:

 

Post#7 » by UKF » Fri Jan 4, 2008 8:04 am

I would much rather do something else. I dont see why we would take Gordon. We need a big man...I personally dont think we'll get that in Noah.
User avatar
Crimson King
Pro Prospect
Posts: 957
And1: 31
Joined: Apr 26, 2007

 

Post#8 » by Crimson King » Fri Jan 4, 2008 8:24 am

The first is take Gordon out of the deal and add scrubs from Chicago to the Kings (Khryapa, Griffin...).
Cowology
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 40,070
And1: 3,679
Joined: Sep 05, 2004

 

Post#9 » by Cowology » Fri Jan 4, 2008 8:51 am

How the heck do the Kings get Noah, Gordon & Smith for Artest & Kenny??? C'mon man...at least make an effort to present a balanced trade for once.
HotSpurs21
Analyst
Posts: 3,116
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 30, 2005

 

Post#10 » by HotSpurs21 » Fri Jan 4, 2008 2:04 pm

there's just no way the Bulls will give up Noah and Gordon for Zach. If the Knicks buy him out and he's available at vet min, then maybe. He's just way too risky to take on, even for merely expiring contracts
VintaGe36
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,032
And1: 88
Joined: May 04, 2007
       

 

Post#11 » by VintaGe36 » Fri Jan 4, 2008 2:21 pm

Its official, Smills can NEVER call out another poster for blatant homerism, EVER again.

We got dirt on him. :wink:

NY would cut SAC out faster than a New York Minute, who cares if the pieces dont fit, if Ben Gordon and Noah are offered, you better believe NY will take them.
User avatar
coldfish
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 59,006
And1: 35,202
Joined: Jun 11, 2004
Location: Right in the middle
   

 

Post#12 » by coldfish » Fri Jan 4, 2008 2:26 pm

LOL.

So far this season, I could make a pretty good argument that Deng, Gordon, Noah and Joe Smith are the team's best players. Noah actually leads the team and all rookies for PER. He just doesn't get on the court because the $60M man gets his entitlement minutes.

No way that the Bulls trade 3 of their best guys for the wrecking ball that is Zach Randolph. Sorry, Smills, but this is pretty bad.
Cliff Levingston
RealGM
Posts: 22,667
And1: 1,094
Joined: May 29, 2003
Location: Cliff Levingston is omnipresent.
       

 

Post#13 » by Cliff Levingston » Fri Jan 4, 2008 3:18 pm

coldfish wrote:Sorry, Smills, but this is pretty bad.

"Pretty bad" does this trade too much justice. "Amazingly horribly awful" is much closer to the reality of it.
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

 

Post#14 » by Smills91 » Fri Jan 4, 2008 3:30 pm

yeah, just confirming the thought...nobody in their right mind wants Randolph. As for Artest/Kenny....I don't think Gordon has the value he once did. Smith is filler and Noah is the reason for the deal. If you look at between the Bulls and Kings it's not that far off.
User avatar
coldfish
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 59,006
And1: 35,202
Joined: Jun 11, 2004
Location: Right in the middle
   

 

Post#15 » by coldfish » Fri Jan 4, 2008 3:58 pm

Smills91 wrote:yeah, just confirming the thought...nobody in their right mind wants Randolph. As for Artest/Kenny....I don't think Gordon has the value he once did. Smith is filler and Noah is the reason for the deal. If you look at between the Bulls and Kings it's not that far off.


I think you are just looking at this from a Sacramento perspective.

- Smith, right now, is not just filler to Chicago. He is actually and sadly our best big man.
- Gordon, right now, has very little trade value due to his contract and size. However, he is the teams only real scorer.
- Artest would just join the log jam at SF.

Essentially both players from Chicago have far more value to Chicago than Sacramento. The player received by Chicago has less value to the Bulls than Sacramento.

So, while it may be fair for Sacramento (since they don't need Smith or Gordon), its a huge hose job for Chicago (who doesn't need Artest, but needs Gordon, Smith and Noah in the long term)
#1knickfan
Banned User
Posts: 3,590
And1: 2
Joined: Apr 26, 2007

 

Post#16 » by #1knickfan » Fri Jan 4, 2008 4:18 pm

VintaGe36 wrote:Its official, Smills can NEVER call out another poster for blatant homerism, EVER again.

We got dirt on him. :wink:

NY would cut SAC out faster than a New York Minute, who cares if the pieces dont fit, if Ben Gordon and Noah are offered, you better believe NY will take them.


Exactly, if I thought that Randolph could somehow net the Knicks Noah and Gordon I would totally forget Ron Artest. Even though I don't like Gordon or Noah and think they wouldn't help the Knicks in any way shape or form we could certainly use them as trade chips to get guys who could actually help.
Cliff Levingston
RealGM
Posts: 22,667
And1: 1,094
Joined: May 29, 2003
Location: Cliff Levingston is omnipresent.
       

 

Post#17 » by Cliff Levingston » Fri Jan 4, 2008 5:21 pm

#1knickfan wrote:Even though I don't like Gordon or Noah and think they wouldn't help the Knicks in any way shape or form

Right... cause you've got plenty of perimeter shooting and interior defense already....?
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,268
And1: 5,446
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

 

Post#18 » by KF10 » Fri Jan 4, 2008 5:29 pm

This is pretty bad for Chicago... But wasnt there a rumor between Chi/Sac/Lal something like Gordon goes to Sacto, Chi gets Kobe and Lal gets Artest and Wallace?
User avatar
LeQuitterNotMVP
Analyst
Posts: 3,699
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 06, 2007
Location: Props to Trixx for the avy!
     

 

Post#19 » by LeQuitterNotMVP » Fri Jan 4, 2008 8:48 pm

:eek: WOW.
#1knickfan
Banned User
Posts: 3,590
And1: 2
Joined: Apr 26, 2007

 

Post#20 » by #1knickfan » Fri Jan 4, 2008 10:39 pm

Cliff Levingston wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


Right... cause you've got plenty of perimeter shooting and interior defense already....?


No but we have plenty of undersized shooting guards who need the ball to be effective. I really don't care for Noah much at all and I was happy the bulls wasted our pick on him.

Return to Trades and Transactions