Page 1 of 1
NY-Sac-Cle
Posted: Tue Jan 8, 2008 11:10 pm
by dom80e
NY trades Randolph and Rose for Hughes and Thomas.
Cleveland trades Hughes, Snow and Newble for Bibby and Randolph.
Sacramento trades Bibby and Thomas for Snow, Newble and Rose.
Posted: Tue Jan 8, 2008 11:14 pm
by loserX
I would think that Sacramento would demand SOMETHING of worth in a Bibby trade, be it a protected pick or a second-tier young asset or something.
Here they get shorter contracts than KT's, but the players themselves are near useless. At least Bibby contributes.
Posted: Tue Jan 8, 2008 11:14 pm
by #1knickfan
Terrible for NY.
Posted: Tue Jan 8, 2008 11:18 pm
by Smills91
loserX wrote:I would think that Sacramento would demand SOMETHING of worth in a Bibby trade, be it a protected pick or a second-tier young asset or something.
Here they get shorter contracts than KT's, but the players themselves are near useless. At least Bibby contributes.
When does that matter on RealGM to a supposed "rebuilding" team? I'm being facetious for those who can't tell my tone.
Posted: Tue Jan 8, 2008 11:51 pm
by Bac2Basics
This is beyond terrible for Sacramento.
Newble's only value is as an expiring, he has no real value on the court.
Snow and Rose are clearly negative value players.
It would take multiple first round picks to Sacramento just to bring it up to the level of just a bad trade versus the abomination that it currently is.