Offers for Zach Randolph
Posted: Wed Jan 9, 2008 6:27 pm
It's clear that the Curry-Randolph frontcourt is not working.
What team could use a guy like Randolph?
What team could use a guy like Randolph?
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Wed Jan 9, 2008 6:28 pm
Find the other 3,284 exact same threads on this boards for your answer.
Posted: Wed Jan 9, 2008 6:29 pm
Cliff Levingston wrote:Find the other 3,284 exact same threads on this boards for your answer.
Yeah this has pretty much been beaten to death.
Posted: Wed Jan 9, 2008 6:47 pm
moocow007 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Yeah this has pretty much been beaten to death.
Then dug out of its grave and beaten some more.
Posted: Wed Jan 9, 2008 6:55 pm
Posted: Wed Jan 9, 2008 9:44 pm
Kevin Pritchard should be handed Exec of the year for essentially getting Frye, Rudy Fernandez and James Jones from the Randolph deal.
Posted: Wed Jan 9, 2008 9:53 pm
#1knickfan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Then dug out of its grave and beaten some more.
ya it has
Posted: Wed Jan 9, 2008 10:23 pm
Jack wore plaid wrote:Kevin Pritchard should be handed Exec of the year for essentially getting Frye, Rudy Fernandez and James Jones from the Randolph deal.
Its funny, in that a grip of people said that New York won that trade and that Isiah finally did something smart for once. haha.
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:35 am
The Warriors would offer Michael Pietrus and a grilled cheese sandwich. (a very expensive grilled cheese sandwich)
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:38 am
MbengaforMVP wrote:The Warriors would offer Michael Pietrus and a grilled cheese sandwich. (a very expensive grilled cheese sandwich)
No we don't.
I don't want Randolph anywhere near this team, he's a bad fit for us on the court and a sh*t load of money to take on.
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:21 am
4ho5ive wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Its funny, in that a grip of people said that New York won that trade and that Isiah finally did something smart for once. haha.
For what its worth I still like the deal as a trade in and of itself. It is just a shame that being a good deal for both teams on paper doesn't translate into wins on the court.
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:24 am
A 1st rounder with an expiring this year? LOL For the albatross who knows what it will take, he seems to be of the "infectious disease" variety!
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:43 am
#1knickfan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
For what its worth I still like the deal as a trade in and of itself. It is just a shame that being a good deal for both teams on paper doesn't translate into wins on the court.
Usually a 'good trade' results in wins, otherwise it'd be considered a 'bad' trade.
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:34 am
gswhoops wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
No we don't.
I don't want Randolph anywhere near this team, he's a bad fit for us on the court and a sh*t load of money to take on.
So was it more Pietrus or more the grilled cheese that makes you decline?
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:50 am
MbengaforMVP wrote:The Warriors would offer Michael Pietrus and a grilled cheese sandwich. (a very expensive grilled cheese sandwich)
Oh yeah? The Rockets offer Mike James, Luis Scola, Steve Francis and a specialty made grilled chicken sub, extra mayo and b.b.q sauce.
Sh-t, you know what? Throw in a pepsi to finalize the deal.
Trade ID #4402298
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Theres nothing short of the Knicks throwing in their unprotected first rounder that would get me to take Randolph. Even with that deal, I'm immediately buying him out or just cutting him.
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 3:31 pm
Smills91 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Usually a 'good trade' results in wins, otherwise it'd be considered a 'bad' trade.
Of course if you take a rather narrow view of the definition of good. Not that I'd ever accuse you of looking at things in any other way than narrow.