RealGM

I really don't get it from either team's perspective. The Bucks already have that Chinese guy at power foward and unless its an unlikely blockbuster deal involving Michael Redd I really don't see the Bucks capable of offering the Knicks anything of any value. A Bobby Simmons and Charlie Villanueva deal works salary wise but really sucks for the Knicks. Simmons has proven to be a really big free agent mistake and the Knicks have plenty of those while Villanueva is nothing special. Is there any way to tweek this deal to make it look better for both teams?

It's impossible to serve a plate of crap(Z-BO) and make it taste good.

I don't see it either, even if fair value could be agreed upon. The Bucks can score, but are an awful defensive team, and taking on Randolph does very little to address that. So why pay all that money for him?

Smills91 wrote:It's impossible to serve a plate of crap(Z-BO) and make it taste good.

This thread is reserved for non-a$$holes who try to be objective. You miss on both counts.

#1knickfan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



This thread is reserved for non-a$$holes who try to be objective. You miss on both counts.

Is this your attempt at telling me and everyone else here that Zach Randolph is anything more than a cancer that has trade value?

Smills91 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Is this your attempt at telling me and everyone else here that Zach Randolph is anything more than a cancer that has trade value?

No, it's his attempt to tell you to stop being an ass.

Okay...there's already at least one other thread open on this topic, and this is already looking doomed. Please, PLEASE lay off the personal attacks and name-calling, everybody.