76ers / Cavs / Bucks

Bac2Basics · Post #1 » by **Bac2Basics** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 3:52 am

76ers Give:
Andre Miller, Willie Green, Calvin Booth
76ers Get:
Daniel Gibson, Damon Jones, Ira Newble, Desmond Mason, Cav's Future 1st

Bucks Give:
Charlie V, Dan Gadzuric, Mo Williams, Desmond Mason
Bucks Get:
Andre Miller, Drew Gooden, Willie Green, Shannon Brown

Cavs Give:
Daniel Gibson, Ira Newble, Drew Gooden, Damon Jones, Shannon Brown, Future 1st
Cavs Get:
Mo Williams, Dan Gadzuric, Charlie V., Calvin Booth

What does everyone think of this?

Post #2 » by **loserX** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 3:56 am

Seems at least fine for the Sixers, but I don't know that Gibson is all that appealing with Lou Williams already there. But maybe.

I don't think the Bucks like it. They don't really need to upgrade CV to Gooden, and I doubt they want to swap Mo Williams for Andre Miller (I suspect they want to get younger). Dropping Gadzuric is nice, but I doubt they do this in terms of direction.

I would think the Cavs like it, even with Gadzuric as the ballast.

Bac2Basics · Post #3 » by **Bac2Basics** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 3:59 am

I thought that the Bucks deal was more shakeup than a youth rebuild, but if they're aiming for a youth movement I can see your point.

joey-A · Post #4 » by **joey-A** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 4:06 am

Seems fine for the sixers ? It's a **** deal for them. Have no need for a one demensional short player like Gibson. Has no athleticism, can't drive to the hoop, or at least doesn't. All he can do is shoot. And he's not great there unless he gets a wide open look. Playing with a super star like Lebron gets him those. At Texas he was a horrible shooter, and a horrible PG. Lou Williams is mounds better. And both Mason & Jones don't help at all with the Cap, so why bother. It doesn't clear money enough for the Sixers. And the 2009 free agent market sucks. You don't give away a superior PG for that pile of you know what. Philly laughs at this. Good for them ?..Not hardly.

LiquidFire · Post #5 » by **LiquidFire** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 4:20 am

hell no from cavs

DanTown8587 · Post #6 » by **DanTown8587** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 4:20 am

Cavs pass, Gooden to Gadzuric is a drop off and the Cavs don't want to add any deals that expire after LeBron.

Bac2Basics · Post #7 » by **Bac2Basics** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 4:35 am

Cav's also get Charlie V, and I've heard Cav's fan's say multiple times that they're post depth is a problem because it's been said multiple times that unless they get at least one post player back, they can't trade Gooden.

In this trade, Cleveland is +1 in post players.

DanTown8587 · Post #8 » by **DanTown8587** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 4:43 am

I don't know why people think Drew Gooden needs to get traded, he plays much better defense than CV and I think its a different animal to play with LeBron and Gooden accepts that.

DanTown8587 · Post #9 » by **DanTown8587** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 4:45 am

I don't know why people think Drew Gooden needs to get traded, he plays much better defense than CV and I think its a different animal to play with LeBron and Gooden accepts that.

Post #10 » by **TheOUTLAW** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 4:46 am

I'm not a Mo Williams fan. He's more shooting guard than point IMO and he's not as good a shooter as Gibson and you have them adding a first. Nah, I don't see the Cavs making that trade at all.

trwi7 · Post #11 » by **trwi7** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 4:54 am

Bucks pass. Mo is better than Miller, Gooden would be a backup for Yi, we give up a nice young player in CV and replace him with Brown and then Green for Gadzuric, I'd rather have Green but not at the expense of Mo and CV.

corwin · Post #12 » by **corwin** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:45 pm

joey-A wrote:Seems fine for the sixers ? It's a **** deal for them. Have no need for a one demensional short player like Gibson. Has no athleticism, can't drive to the hoop, or at least doesn't. All he can do is shoot. And he's not great there unless he gets a wide open look. Playing with a super star like Lebron gets him those. At Texas he was a horrible shooter, and a horrible PG. Lou Williams is mounds better. And both Mason & Jones don't help at all with the Cap, so why bother. It doesn't clear money enough for the Sixers. And the 2009 free agent market sucks. You don't give away a superior PG for that pile of you know what. Philly laughs at this. Good for them ?..Not hardly.

+1.
While I agree Miller would look good in Cleveland, Philly needs to get some value. Gibson is OK but not on Philly's radar with Williams & Green on the team.

Baddy Chuck · Post #13 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 9:00 pm

I wouldnt do it for the Bucks because I dont believe it makes us any better then we currently are. Not bad value, but not what we need.

LeQuitterNotMVP · Post #14 » by **LeQuitterNotMVP** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 9:08 pm

HELL NO! CV is extremely soft, and we're not trading Gooden and Boobie for him and Williams. No way!!!

hoopsdownlow · Post #15 » by **hoopsdownlow** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 9:44 pm

hell yess from the cavs.

LeQuitterNotMVP · Post #16 » by **LeQuitterNotMVP** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 9:53 pm

hoopsdownlow wrote:hell yess from the cavs.

Is it because we get to keep your lover, Hughes?