RealGM

Orlando Trade Breakdown

Change in Team Outlook: +2.8 ppg, +7.1 rpg, and +4.0 apg.

Incoming Players

Jeff Foster
6-11 C / PF from Southwest Texas State
5.8 ppg, 8.4 rpg, 1.5 apg in 23.2 minutes

Jamaal Tinsley
6-1 PG from Iowa State
13.9 ppg, 4.0 rpg, 8.6 apg in 34.8 minutes

Outgoing Players

Keyon Dooling
6-3 PG from Missouri
8.3 ppg, 1.4 rpg, 1.8 apg in 18.9 minutes

Pat Garrity
6-9 PF from Notre Dame
2.3 ppg, 2.0 rpg, 0.6 apg in 12.5 minutes

Carlos Arroyo
6-2 PG from Florida International
6.3 ppg, 1.9 rpg, 3.7 apg in 18.8 minutes

2nd round pick

Indiana Trade Breakdown

Change in Team Outlook: -2.8 ppg, -7.1 rpg, and -4.0 apg.

Incoming Players

Keyon Dooling
6-3 PG from Missouri
8.3 ppg, 1.4 rpg, 1.8 apg in 18.9 minutes

Pat Garrity
6-9 PF from Notre Dame
2.3 ppg, 2.0 rpg, 0.6 apg in 12.5 minutes

Carlos Arroyo
6-2 PG from Florida International
6.3 ppg, 1.9 rpg, 3.7 apg in 18.8 minutes

2nd round pick

Outgoing Players

Jeff Foster
6-11 C / PF from Southwest Texas State
5.8 ppg, 8.4 rpg, 1.5 apg in 23.2 minutes

Jamaal Tinsley
6-1 PG from Iowa State
13.9 ppg, 4.0 rpg, 8.6 apg in 34.8 minutes


Why for Orlando: The Magic fill their needs on the cheap. Tinsley is a solid PG who will fit nicely into SVG's system. Foster is the dirty work PF the Magic desperately need.

Why for Indy: Indy is going nowhere in a hurry with their current roster. They manage to get expiring contracts for 2 of their uglier contracts and finally start to rebuild around Granger, Dunleavy, and JO.

lazy cut & paste posting

Bad deal for Pacers

sorry but tinsleys and foster value is not nearly that low

How about we combine this with the other trade seen here:
http://www.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=749406

Throw in Andre Owens to balance the rosters a bit and we get:

Orl sends: Arroyo, Dooling, Battie, Redick, Garrity
Orl gets: Tinsley, Murphy, Foster, Harrison, Owens

Ind sends: Tinsley, Murphy, Foster, Harrison, Owens
Ind gets: Arroyo, Dooling, Battie, Redick, Garrity

Better?

rela wrote:sorry but tinsleys and foster value is not nearly that low

Of course it is. Indy has been trying to move Tinsley for years.

Not that low that we need to chip in Foster(one of our better contracts) to get some expirings.
I'm pretty sure Tinsley can catch expirings on his own. Not that I would do it for Arroyo, Dooling and Garrity.

We would even cut Foster out and just do Tinsley for expirings. Don't tell me the Pacers wouldn't jump at that.

Probably.

No way are we trading Foster though. No thanks.

I would still rather trade Murphy. Don't you guys still need another big?

"Orl sends: Arroyo, Dooling, Battie, Redick, Garrity
Orl gets: Tinsley, Murphy, Foster, Harrison, Owens

Ind sends: Tinsley, Murphy, Foster, Harrison, Owens
Ind gets: Arroyo, Dooling, Battie, Redick, Garrity "

We wouldn't have any big man depth. JO would have to move to center, and even then we wouldn't have a back up. Take out Foster + Battie (it should still work in trade checker)


Daniels - Arroyo - Dooling
Dunleavy - Rush - Redick
Granger - Williams - Rush
JO - Williams - Garrity
Foster - JO

We could run alot of quick lineups (Daniels/Dunleavy/Granger/Williams/JO). This leaves us with only one bad contract (Dunleavy) and it could easily be argued that he is playing up to his contract ATM.