Page 1 of 2
Kings - Clippers
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 4:00 pm
by Smills91
Kings deal:
Kevin Martin
Kenny Thomas
Shareef Abdur-Rahim
Clippers deal:
Elton Brand
Aaron Williams
Josh Powell
Dan Dickau
Kings take a chance that Brand fully recovers to fill their void at the 4.
Clippers get a young future all-star 2 guard to build around with Ka(ve)man.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 4:14 pm
by loflin3hree5ive
if elton even mentions the possibility of not resigning i'm all over this.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:12 pm
by Smills91
loflin3hree5ive wrote:if elton even mentions the possibility of not resigning i'm all over this.
And if he doesn't, you'll still consider it?
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:10 pm
by gswhoops
Seems like a deal that is reasonably fair value-wise (right now) but will never happen.
If Brand doesn't recover fully or won't agree to an extension, then Sacramento would never, ever consider this deal.
If Brand makes a full comeback and agrees to resign, IMO he's worth significantly more than Martin. So the Clippers pass.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:13 pm
by Bac2Basics
Smills - have you suddenly soured on Kevin Martin?
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:20 pm
by loflin3hree5ive
Smills91 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
And if he doesn't, you'll still consider it?
having such an awful backcourt as the clippers have and having not seen elton play since april makes me itch to pull the trigger on this but then reality sets in. you just can't trade big for small, even if thomas and sar are coming back.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:38 pm
by Crimson King
If Brand returns healthy, I'd seriously consider this for the Kings.
Miller/Brand/Artest/Salmons/Bibby with Garcia/Udrih/Moore from the bench sounds like a solid team.
For the Clippers, they get a very good young SG, and at least they'd have minutes at PF for Thomas and Abdur Rahim until they draft/sign their future PF. Both Kenny Thomas and Abdur Rahim expire at the same time than Tim Thomas and Mobley.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:55 pm
by loflin3hree5ive
heres a scenario for you:
brand plays 15 games for the clippers this season, has a double double in each game. clippers pick #2 overall & draft michael beasley.
brand opts out and clippers s&t for this package. i might have to ask douby as part of the package to compensate trading big for small.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:09 pm
by Bac2Basics
I'm a big fan of Brand, but I seriously doubt Petrie proposes this deal.
My guess is if Petrie was going to propose a deal for Brand to Sacramento it would be something more along the lines of
Artest, Douby & either SAR or KT
for
Brand
with filler on both sides as needed
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:17 pm
by positivetension
Bac2Basics wrote:I'm a big fan of Brand, but I seriously doubt Petrie proposes this deal.
My guess is if Petrie was going to propose a deal for Brand to Sacramento it would be something more along the lines of
Artest, Douby & either SAR or KT
for
Brand
with filler on both sides as needed
lol? After that you can trade Beno for Chris Paul.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:18 pm
by loflin3hree5ive
Bac2Basics wrote:I'm a big fan of Brand, but I seriously doubt Petrie proposes this deal.
My guess is if Petrie was going to propose a deal for Brand to Sacramento it would be something more along the lines of
Artest, Douby & either SAR or KT
for
Brand
with filler on both sides as needed
unlikely the clips will take back a bad contract, a head case and a 2nd tier prospect for an all-nba power foward.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:21 pm
by ahartleyvu
I like this deal for both teams.
Sacramento will lose alot of games for the rest of the season without Martin. They could then ship out Bibby, Miller, Artest for prospects who are close to accomplishing their potential.
The following season they would have a pretty healthy Brand, along with the great draft pick they will get, and their prospects. Plus, Hawes should be a better player next season as well.
As for the Clippers trading big for small, I agree. I think Udrih might need to be included, and maybe a 2nd round pick or something.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:23 pm
by Bac2Basics
My point being that I don't see Petrie seeking out to trade Kevin Martin despite Smills recent interest in the idea.
For Petrie to consider trading Kevin Martin it would have to be an outstanding deal for Sacramento and as good as Brand is, I don't see the Kings proposing this kind of deal.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:34 pm
by Crimson King
Bac2Basics wrote:My point being that I don't see Petrie seeking out to trade Kevin Martin despite Smills recent interest in the idea.
For Petrie to consider trading Kevin Martin it would have to be an outstanding deal for Sacramento and as good as Brand is, I don't see the Kings proposing this kind of deal.
With the recent play of Salmons (who is a much better fit next to Bibby than Martin IMO), if you can deal Martin with some of the bad contracts for a Pau Gasol or an Elton Brand, you have to do it.
I know Martin is young and a franchise player for the Kings, but with the current roster, it's better trying to win now (and Miller-Artest-Salmons-Bibby with an all star caliber PF can compete for sure) than trade 90% of the roster or suck 3 more years until the worse contracts expire, even if it means trade Martin.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:44 pm
by Smills91
I haven't soured on Martin, I'm just SUPER impressed with John Salmons AND Francisco Garcia AND Dahntay Jones.
I look at it like this...
Would I rather have my 2 and 4 posiitons filled with Martin/Mikki or with Salmons/Brand(healthy).
That's an easy answer for me.
I'd rather spend the dollars on a PF than a SG and since Salmons is locked up at 4-5 million a year for the next 3 years, that allows the Kings to spend on the 4 spot more readily, in this case Brand.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:49 pm
by Bac2Basics
I disagree.
Bibby, Artest and possibly even Miller are at levels where they could help move a bad contract.
And wouldn't the Kings be "renting" Brand just as much as some other team would Artest?
A rebuilding team doesn't trade it's best young player for an older one.
Also, I keep hearing about how the next couple of drafts are full of PF's. If that's the case the Kings should be able to pick one up if they can't get one in trading one of the players they're more likely to be open to moving.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:56 pm
by Crimson King
^^ The problem is the Kings aren
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:02 pm
by Bac2Basics
zar wrote:^^ The problem is the Kings aren
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:24 pm
by Crimson King
Bac2Basics wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
The Kings are a rebuilding team, because to consider them a win-now team would be foolish. They're performing well considering all the injuries but make no mistake, this team is poised for a significant move or two in the near future.
The Kings aren't a rebuilding team, they fill holes one season and another and another as good as they can (Mikki Moore signing, SAR signing, the Bonzi Wells trade and
his resigning attempt, the Artest trade, keep Bibby past February...). They will be a rebuilding team when they make rebuilding moves. Right now they are a team with veterans, some of them bad contracts, and some youth.
I agree this team has to go in one direction or another. Some fans would prefer keep Martin and trade all the veterans for expirings and go into rebuilding mode. I wouldn't mind, but I'd prefer trade Martin for a true PF and try to win now. Right now they are in the middle of nowhere, we'll see what happens: a trade for win now, a trade/s for rebuild or stay another season in the 'win now that can't win' mode.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:13 pm
by ClipperDomination
I agree with loflin. If Brand is leaning towards opting out (which is unlikely), I'd do the trade, but as of right now, I'd rather have Brand and take our chances landing a point guard in Free Angency.