Page 1 of 1

lal,den,phi

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:00 am
by chefy
lal

camby

den

dalembert,miller

phi

kleiza,turiaf,lal's 2nd,brown(expiring),najera(expiring)

Trade ID #4406283

:clap:

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:04 am
by sec-106
Sixers pass.

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:05 am
by Salvistine24
no from philly...those are two of our best trade chips at the moment and we need atleast an above average young prospect back or a 1st round pick even if u make the point that daly is overpaid...if u think his value has increased, then him nd miller should fetch a good young player (not great, just a solid guy), a mid to late 1st, and some expirings

this doesnt do it bc kleiza isnt a good enough prospect and a lal 2nd can just be bought on draft nite...

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:23 am
by VintaGe36
lol.

Turiaf and 2nd = Camby!?!

FAT CHANCE.

you REALLY need to think out your trades.

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:29 am
by chefy
VintaGe36 wrote:lol.

Turiaf and 2nd = Camby!?!

FAT CHANCE.

you REALLY need to think out your trades.



huh?

den gets miller and dally

not turiaf and a 2nd

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:30 am
by VintaGe36
LAL gets Camby for Turiaf and a 2nd.


NOT A CHANCE Camby is gotten that cheaply.

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 4:24 am
by FlawlessVictory
L.A. gets Camby for Kwame, Turiaf, and a 2nd. Still far too cheap, but that is still significantly different because there aren't that many 9kk+ expirings in the NBA at the moment.

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:30 am
by killbuckner
big expiring contracts aren't worth any more than several smaller expirings. Its funny to me how some fans miss this point

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:29 am
by Nutty Nats Fan
A big no way from Denver. Najera is more than just an expiring contract, but a large part of the front court rotation. There is no way they are moving him and Camby, especially if it brings in one center.. not nearly as good as Camby. Dre can't play PF or C. Kleiza is a really good young player.

This is really really bad for Denver, sorry.

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:51 pm
by JBuisness21
Let me tell you something and this isto everybody else on this forum Nuggets have 3 untouchables in nene melo and kleiza so all these trades saying nuggets getting rid of nene's horrible contract are idiots they signed him to that deal because he is there center of the future! :wavefinger: :wavefinger: :wavefinger:

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 4:28 pm
by DaFan334
JBuisness21 wrote:Let me tell you something and this isto everybody else on this forum Nuggets have 3 untouchables in nene melo and kleiza so all these trades saying nuggets getting rid of nene's horrible contract are idiots they signed him to that deal because he is there center of the future! :wavefinger: :wavefinger: :wavefinger:


LK isnt even close to untouchable. Theres a good chance he would have higher value in a trade simply because he is a 3 and time at the 3 is always hard to find behind melo. The guy could do alot more if he wasnt out of position all of the time as he usually is with the Nugs.