GSW/SAC

Moderators: BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck

User avatar
longfellow44
Head Coach
Posts: 6,015
And1: 232
Joined: May 04, 2007
Location: Washinton DC

GSW/SAC 

Post#1 » by longfellow44 » Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:57 pm

I can't seem to get the salaries to match up correctly because of Martins PPP but i think a trade like this could benifit both teams.

Martin
for
Bellinelli
Wright
081st

this gets the warriors a major young talent and helps them make a bigger push in the playoffs. This trade could also help the kings because we would now have the type of PF that we need next to Hawes and they could both develop togeather Bellinelli would be a decent replacement in the future for Martin and the pick adds a little extra value for the kings.


I'm not a big fan of trading Martin but Smills has got me thinking about it and this is the type of trade that I would be willing to look into.
VintaGe36
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,032
And1: 88
Joined: May 04, 2007
       

 

Post#2 » by VintaGe36 » Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:59 pm

really can't see Kevin Martin commanding that kind of value.
turk3d
RealGM
Posts: 36,652
And1: 1,278
Joined: Jan 30, 2007
Location: Javale McGee, Dubs X Factor

 

Post#3 » by turk3d » Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:59 pm

Why do we want Martin when we already have Ellis (at a much lower price I might add)?
Draymond Green: Exemplifies Warrior Leadership, Hustle, Desire, Versatility, Toughness, fearlessness, Grit, Heart,Team Spirit, Sacrifice
Image
VintaGe36
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,032
And1: 88
Joined: May 04, 2007
       

 

Post#4 » by VintaGe36 » Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:03 pm

turk3d wrote:Why do we want Martin when we already have Ellis (at a much lower price I might add)?


Well, you shouldn't, isn't he about to get PAID?
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

 

Post#5 » by Smills91 » Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:06 pm

No way in hell Kings touch this deal. Not even close. :nonono:
User avatar
Cruel_Ruin
Head Coach
Posts: 6,091
And1: 767
Joined: Nov 05, 2006
Location: The intersection of intellect, imagination and insanity
   

 

Post#6 » by Cruel_Ruin » Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:08 pm

If we're trading Martin, we won't be trading for pieces that have unknown production. At least one established commodity has to be coming back to Sacramento. This is easily a no from the Kings.
turk3d
RealGM
Posts: 36,652
And1: 1,278
Joined: Jan 30, 2007
Location: Javale McGee, Dubs X Factor

 

Post#7 » by turk3d » Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:38 pm

VintaGe36 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Well, you shouldn't, isn't he about to get PAID?

We'll worry about that next year but for now, you can keep Martin and we'll keep Ellis fair enough? Maybe next year we can talk perhaps.
Draymond Green: Exemplifies Warrior Leadership, Hustle, Desire, Versatility, Toughness, fearlessness, Grit, Heart,Team Spirit, Sacrifice
Image
User avatar
pillwenney
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 48,887
And1: 2,603
Joined: Sep 19, 2004
Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
Contact:
 

 

Post#8 » by pillwenney » Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:01 pm

turk3d wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


We'll worry about that next year but for now, you can keep Martin and we'll keep Ellis fair enough? Maybe next year we can talk perhaps.


Martin's extenstion doesn't even kick in until next year--when you'll have to pay Monta anyway.

Regardless they aren't even that similar of players. The only reason that they're constantly compared is that they are both draft steals and both play in Northern California.

But yeah, the Kings probably pass until Wright proves himself a little.
SactownHrtBrks8
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,978
And1: 68
Joined: Jun 10, 2004
 

 

Post#9 » by SactownHrtBrks8 » Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:09 pm

I doubt GS does it. They're high on Wright

Kings don't touch it. Martin is our future star
User avatar
Rugged Ron Ron
Pro Prospect
Posts: 784
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 09, 2006

 

Post#10 » by Rugged Ron Ron » Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:09 pm

turk3d wrote:Why do we want Martin when we already have Ellis (at a much lower price I might add)?
Maybe because Martin is a much better player than Ellis?

Anyway, GS gave up more value, considering Wright was a lotto pick, was traded for Richardson. But I dont like it for Sac either. Both Wright/Belinelli havent showned much and are too unproven talent. Martin has already proved himself to worthy of his contract.
Image
User avatar
TMACFORMVP
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,947
And1: 161
Joined: Jun 30, 2006
Location: 9th Seed

 

Post#11 » by TMACFORMVP » Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:13 pm

I doubt both teams do it, Martin is an established star and their franchise player, while the Warriors have pretty high hopes for Wright and Belli for the future. Besides their SG position is fine with Ellis, Azubuike, and at spots with Watson, Jackson and Pietrus.
turk3d
RealGM
Posts: 36,652
And1: 1,278
Joined: Jan 30, 2007
Location: Javale McGee, Dubs X Factor

 

Post#12 » by turk3d » Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:16 pm

Rugged Ron Ron wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Maybe because Martin is a much better player than Ellis?

Anyway, GS gave up more value, considering Wright was a lotto pick, was traded for Richardson. But I dont like it for Sac either. Both Wright/Belinelli havent showned much and are too unproven talent. Martin has already proved himself to worthy of his contract.

Maybe we don't think so and that's why we don't do it.
Draymond Green: Exemplifies Warrior Leadership, Hustle, Desire, Versatility, Toughness, fearlessness, Grit, Heart,Team Spirit, Sacrifice
Image
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,351
And1: 5,962
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

 

Post#13 » by gswhoops » Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:40 pm

Both teams pass.

Martin is a great young player, and I'd love to have him in GS, but we already have a lot of talent at the 2 (Ellis, Azubuike, Belinelli, etc.) and really only 1 young big man (Biedrins) outside of Wright. If the deal were centered around Ellis+ for Martin, then I'd be all over it, but then there's really no point for Sacramento.

As is, Sacto loses out on a potential franchise SG for some unknowns - not something I think they want to do at this point.
User avatar
Rasheed36
Senior
Posts: 648
And1: 2
Joined: Dec 05, 2006

 

Post#14 » by Rasheed36 » Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:42 pm

Kings need more of an established big who can actually play defense.
yungal07
Banned User
Posts: 7,161
And1: 2
Joined: Feb 23, 2007
Location: The DMV

 

Post#15 » by yungal07 » Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:46 pm

Pointless trade for both teams.

What I'd like to see is a Gasol for Martin type of deal. I think both teams could live with that.
User avatar
Rugged Ron Ron
Pro Prospect
Posts: 784
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 09, 2006

 

Post#16 » by Rugged Ron Ron » Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:53 pm

turk3d wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


Maybe I don't think so and that's why we don't do it.

Fixed* I think you're the only who dont think Martin is better than Ellis. Take it to the comparison board if you want to.
Image
User avatar
crzy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,224
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 10, 2006
Location: San Francisco

 

Post#17 » by crzy » Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:20 am

What a stupid deal for the Warriors. Why do we need another two guard?
Image
User avatar
Bac2Basics
RealGM
Posts: 13,588
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 03, 2001
Location: "Are you like a crazy person? I'm quite sure they will say so."
   

 

Post#18 » by Bac2Basics » Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:32 am

There are only a handful of players in the league that Sacramento would/should consider trading Kevin Martin for, and Golden State doesn't have a single one of those players on it's roster.
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

 

Post#19 » by Smills91 » Wed Jan 16, 2008 1:24 am

turk3d wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


Maybe we don't think so and that's why we don't do it.


Tell your wife Marge, and Kids, Bart, Lisa and Maggie hi for me, would you.
deNIEd
Banned User
Posts: 4,942
And1: 30
Joined: Jul 18, 2006

 

Post#20 » by deNIEd » Wed Jan 16, 2008 1:46 am

I dunno,
I think if Petrie/Maloofs completely committed to rebuilding, they could do something like this, if they feel that Wright is legit and has the ability in becoming a future Allstar/MVP type of a PF.

Reason being why i can see Petrie trading Martin, is Petrie's ability to draft wing players. Peja, Hedo, Gerald, Martin, Garcia, Douby all of whom have proved they are all good/great players. And Petrie's ability to sign wing players that no one previously wanted but are still amazingly productive, Salmons, Jimmy Jackson, House, Mo Evans, etc.

I hate the trade from a fan's pov, but could see it from a team pov

Return to Trades and Transactions