Hou - Mil

supertruck97 · Post #1 » by **supertruck97** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 3:54 pm

Hou Gives:

Battier+James+Scola+Snyder+Novak+08 1st

Mil Gives:

Redd+ CV+Noel+Storey

Why for Hou: Get a 3rd scoreer to go with TMac and Yao. Sacrifice defense and a pick, but try to make a run sooner rather than later.

Alston/Redd/TMac/Hayes/Yao

Why for Mil: Snyder expires, while Battier gives them a vet defensive presence. Scola is developing nicely, and has an inside game that could compliment well behind Yi's more outside tendency. The 1st is a little extra sweetener.

skones · Post #2 » by **skones** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 4:14 pm

Milwaukee passes easily.

EastSideBucksFan · Post #3 » by **EastSideBucksFan** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 4:19 pm

Our local radio Bucks insider guy is saying the Redd/CV for TMac/Wells deal is still alive and they're talking still

bucksbrewerspackersfan · Post #4 » by **bucksbrewerspackersfan** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 5:59 pm

Bucks decline we had Mike James and we gave him to you guys what on earth would make you think we want him back at a higher price?

Kreamy · Post #5 » by **Kreamy** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 7:29 pm

Bucks laugh at this. Rockets aren't getting Redd for anything short of McGrady, nevermind Villanueva as well.

Senor Bogut · Post #6 » by **Senor Bogut** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:02 pm

While this isn't the worst we've seen here, its still a big fat NO.

Village Idiot · Post #7 » by **Village Idiot** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:11 pm

EastSideBucksFan wrote:Our local radio Bucks insider guy is saying the Redd/CV for TMac/Wells deal is still alive and they're talking still

That trade makes a lot of sense. A 3-way with T-Mac going elsewhere and the Bucks getting young talent and picks makes a lot more sense for them. There time is clearly not now. No reason for them to trade for a guy who is at (or past) his prime like T-Mac.

RideEmCowboy24 · Post #8 » by **RideEmCowboy24** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 9:44 pm

Village Idiot wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

That trade makes a lot of sense. A 3-way with T-Mac going elsewhere and the Bucks getting young talent and picks makes a lot more sense for them. There time is clearly not now. No reason for them to trade for a guy who is at (or past) his prime like T-Mac.

yeah....but our GM is out of a job if we don't make the playoffs, and we aren't going to....so tmac could be a last ditch effort to, if nothing else, get some fans to come out and see the games

RoxFan08 · Post #9 » by **RoxFan08** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:23 pm

I'm pretty sure the Tmac/Wells for CV/Redd deal includes Miwaukee's 1st. Its not even close without it.

bucksbrewerspackersfan · Post #10 » by **bucksbrewerspackersfan** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 11:17 pm

Why would Milwaukee give up a 1st I will not question McGrady's talent but his injury history is what changes things. While Redd has missed a handful of games for his career McGrady had missed a lot more by a large margin. McGrady is what is he is a guy who plays 50 games a year. I would not give up Redd for that let alont our 1st round pick. On top of that Mike James no way you guys wanted him you can keep him.

BucksRuleAll22 · Post #11 » by **BucksRuleAll22** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 11:44 pm

There been rumors the Rockets have offered McGrady for Redd and want to trade for Redd badly so don't think you would get rid without McGrady involved.