Gadz & Charlie V for Kwame, Critt

Moderators: BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck

loflin3hree5ive
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,342
And1: 67
Joined: Aug 27, 2003
Location: Clipperland

Gadz & Charlie V for Kwame, Critt 

Post#1 » by loflin3hree5ive » Thu Jan 17, 2008 12:28 am

Lakers Get:
Dan Gadzuric
Charlie Vilanueva

Bucks Get:
Kwame Brown (Expiring)
Javaris Crittenton

Lakers get a shot blocker and a Phil Jax rebuilding project.

Bucks shed some money and get a project point guard.
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,048
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

 

Post#2 » by loserX » Thu Jan 17, 2008 12:31 am

Gadzuric is making fewer blocks per game than Kwame this season, and his contract is atrocious. Lakers quickly decline.
loflin3hree5ive
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,342
And1: 67
Joined: Aug 27, 2003
Location: Clipperland

 

Post#3 » by loflin3hree5ive » Thu Jan 17, 2008 12:45 am

gadz doesn't get many minutes to make stats even out and with phil lighting a fire under him, doesn't anybody think gadz can live up to that contract under those circumstances? getting charlie v is also a steal for the lakers in this one.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,256
And1: 19,266
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

 

Post#4 » by shrink » Thu Jan 17, 2008 12:56 am

Kwame + Crit costs $18.5

Gadzuric and Villanueva would cost a team $34.8 million dollars.

CV's value isn't great enough, even if Crit wasn't in the deal. In addition, the Lakers are over the lux, so some of that money would be doubled.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,256
And1: 19,266
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

 

Post#5 » by shrink » Thu Jan 17, 2008 12:59 am

If Gadz is really becoming an issue, I suggest MIL would have the most luck if they look at trading him for deals of similar length, like VladRad or Jaric. OF those three though, I still think Gadz has most negative trade value.
User avatar
chefy
Head Coach
Posts: 7,014
And1: 658
Joined: Aug 14, 2006

 

Post#6 » by chefy » Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:00 am

U-Borat wrote:Hell no from LA.
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,048
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

 

Post#7 » by loserX » Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:35 am

loflin3hree5ive wrote:gadz doesn't get many minutes to make stats even out


Because he's terrible. I still think the Lakers are better off keeping Kwame.
loflin3hree5ive
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,342
And1: 67
Joined: Aug 27, 2003
Location: Clipperland

 

Post#8 » by loflin3hree5ive » Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:44 am

loserX wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Because he's terrible. I still think the Lakers are better off keeping Kwame.


maybe so. i know i enjoyed watching him on nbalp he year before he got his contract, gadz was a shot blocking machine.
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,692
And1: 13,927
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

 

Post#9 » by Scoot McGroot » Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:05 am

Switch Crittenton to Vujacic and you might have something. Maybe add in a 2nd rounder from LA.


Dumping Gadzuric's deal will cost Milwaukee, especially when, sad to say, Kwame is a superior player to Gadzuric.

Return to Trades and Transactions