JO to Suns

Moderators: BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck

ballboy4life
Sophomore
Posts: 126
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 20, 2007

JO to Suns 

Post#1 » by ballboy4life » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:11 am

Trade ID #4417888

Phoenix Incoming
Jermaine O'Neal
Kareem Rush
Andre Owens
Phoenix Outgoing
Boris Diaw
Leandro Barbosa
Raja Bell
Marcus Banks
ATL 2008 #1 Pick

Indiana Incoming
Boris Diaw
Leandro Barbosa
Raja Bell
Marcus Banks
ATL 2008 #1 Pick
Indiana Outgoing
Jermaine O'Neal
Kareem Rush
Andre Owens


Phoenix
C-Jermaine O'neal
PF-Amare Stodemaire
SF-Shawn Marion
SG-Grant Hill
PG-Steve Nash

Indiana
C-Jeff Foster
PF-Boris Diaw
SF-Danny Granger
SG-Raja Bell
PG-Jamaal Tinsley
6th man Leandro Barbosa




I feel like Phoenix gives up too much for JO, but that is the best lineup in the NBA IMO with a great player from top to bottom. If anyone can figure out how to get a third team in so that Phoenix doesnt have to give up everyone in its backcourt but Nash, then please post your ideas.
User avatar
The Penguin
"Beat The Commish" Champion/Mr. Clean Slate
Posts: 7,267
And1: 4,109
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Location: Columbus
     

 

Post#2 » by The Penguin » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:30 am

The Suns supposedly want to move Amare or Marion to free up money and have sold first round picks for cash to stay under the luxary tax, I don't see any way they add JO and still have Mario & Amare.
Da Houndawg #55
Ballboy
Posts: 2
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 01, 2003
Location: My Y2K Bunker / Panic Room

 

Post#3 » by Da Houndawg #55 » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:46 am

Salary-wise Banks+Marion for JO plus Granger works.

Granger gone frees up space for Marion in the side, Grant Hill can just play 3 in a front court with Amare and JO.

I just can't see the Pacers wanting to give him up for Marion... even if we threw a pick in or something.
*Insert greatest signature Known to mankind here*
ahartleyvu
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,352
And1: 60
Joined: May 01, 2007

 

Post#4 » by ahartleyvu » Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:09 am

Da Houndawg #55 wrote:Salary-wise Banks+Marion for JO plus Granger works.

Granger gone frees up space for Marion in the side, Grant Hill can just play 3 in a front court with Amare and JO.



Green font?
PacerGuy
Analyst
Posts: 3,126
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Location: Indy

 

Post#5 » by PacerGuy » Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:11 am

We would for Amare'! He is rumored to have PHX at least listening to offers. Swap him w/ Marion in a deal, w/ JO in LA, & I'm in! :D
Larry Bird, You are now on the Clock! ( 3/24/08 )
jeremy1215
Banned User
Posts: 3,434
And1: 4
Joined: May 31, 2007

 

Post#6 » by jeremy1215 » Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:17 am

JO for Stoud straight up?
User avatar
Nolan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,911
And1: 6,612
Joined: Aug 26, 2007
Location: Edmonton AB
   

 

Post#7 » by Nolan » Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:29 am

^
not a chance.
@bruce_arthur "And finally, as a whore." RT @docfunk "Here is what LeBron looks like as a Knick, a Fireman, an Astronaut..."
User avatar
b_roy7
Veteran
Posts: 2,908
And1: 0
Joined: May 11, 2007
Contact:

 

Post#8 » by b_roy7 » Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:33 am

Da Houndawg #55 wrote:Salary-wise Banks+Marion for JO plus Granger works.

Granger gone frees up space for Marion in the side, Grant Hill can just play 3 in a front court with Amare and JO.

I just can't see the Pacers wanting to give him up for Marion... even if we threw a pick in or something.
Why would Indy add Granger if they want to re-build by trading Jermaine?

jeremy1215 wrote:JO for Stoud straight up?

I doubt it. Stoudemire's better in almost every way. Age, scoring, less injuries, etc.

Return to Trades and Transactions