Wizards - Wolves

Moderators: pacers33granger, BullyKing, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, Andre Roberstan, MoneyTalks41890, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat

User avatar
omeloon
Starter
Posts: 2,250
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 15, 2004

Wizards - Wolves 

Post#1 » by omeloon » Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:10 am

Jaric, Madsen, and Buckner

for

D. Stevenson and Etan Thomas (sit on IL, his contract expires year earlier than Jaric's)

Minny basically does this to save long term money and to open up a roster spot. Minny saves $2.5 mill this year and another $2.5 mill next season, which will help them re-sign some of their young players. Getting out of Jaric's contract will also help further down the line. Will free $8 mill from teh cap Jaric's last year on contract.

Washington does this because they need the depth. Jaric helps fills in for Arenas. Buckner provides some decent defense. They only lose one current rotation player.
Image
yungal07
Banned User
Posts: 7,161
And1: 2
Joined: Feb 23, 2007
Location: The DMV

 

Post#2 » by yungal07 » Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:14 am

That's awful for the Wiz. Stevenson is better than anyone the Wiz get back in return, and aside from Jaric, none of those bums would get any playing time on the Wizards. Even Jaric would get relegated to 6th guard duties after Arenas comes back.
jeremy1215
Banned User
Posts: 3,434
And1: 4
Joined: May 31, 2007

 

Post#3 » by jeremy1215 » Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:17 am

Yeah thats kinda bad for the Wizards, and I don't think the T'Wolves got much to make it better. They certainly shouldn't add picks.
User avatar
omeloon
Starter
Posts: 2,250
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 15, 2004

 

Post#4 » by omeloon » Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:22 am

Well the Wolves could always give Gerrald Green away for a scrub on an ending contract. Not like they're going to re-sign him anyways
Image
User avatar
omeloon
Starter
Posts: 2,250
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 15, 2004

 

Post#5 » by omeloon » Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:28 am

yungal07 wrote:That's awful for the Wiz. Stevenson is better than anyone the Wiz get back in return, and aside from Jaric, none of those bums would get any playing time on the Wizards. Even Jaric would get relegated to 6th guard duties after Arenas comes back.


Jaric's shooting the ball better than Stevenson. Not sure why Stevenson's that much better than him. Jaric has more size than Stevnson, so can play both guard positions. Statistically Jaric beats Stevenson in most things. All but rebounds, and even that is pretty much identical.
Image
miller31time
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 27,583
And1: 2,152
Joined: Jul 25, 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
     

 

Post#6 » by miller31time » Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:31 am

^^ Defense. So far this season, Stevenson has been a top-10 perimeter defender in the NBA.
yungal07
Banned User
Posts: 7,161
And1: 2
Joined: Feb 23, 2007
Location: The DMV

 

Post#7 » by yungal07 » Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:37 am

omeloon wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Jaric's shooting the ball better than Stevenson. Not sure why Stevenson's that much better than him. Jaric has more size than Stevnson, so can play both guard positions. Statistically Jaric beats Stevenson in most things. All but rebounds, and even that is pretty much identical.


Defensively, Stevenson is one of the better defenders in the NBA. Some on the Wiz board have argued that he's a top 10 perimeter defender in the NBA (although I wouldn't go that far). What he does for the Wiz doesn't show up on the statsheet.

Jaric is certainly not worth an extra year.
User avatar
4ho5ive
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,034
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Location: Minnesota-Where underwhelming happens
Contact:

 

Post#8 » by 4ho5ive » Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:40 am

I dont know much about Stevenson, but to call him Top-10 in perimeter D is kind of a stretch of the imagination dont you think? Maybe im wrong. Dont underestimate Jaric's D however as he can also play the 3 spot successfully. I dont see why the wolves want Stevenson and Etan cant even play. Im not sure we do this either.
GopherIt!
RealGM
Posts: 10,609
And1: 24,755
Joined: Oct 20, 2007
Location: bird watching
Contact:

Marko would fit well with the Wiz. 

Post#9 » by GopherIt! » Wed Jan 23, 2008 11:23 am

Mr. Fifty and Marko are both quality defenders. That being said, Mr. Fifty is listed at 6-5 and if I am not mistaken more like 6-4ish while Marko is a full 6-7. That height difference would certainly help the Wiz defensively against taller (6-8/6-9/6-10) wings. It is especially helpful against teams that are able to create mismatches by featuring a pair of taller wings like Orlando and Atlanta.

Plus a few other astute posters have noted that when you have a superstar guard like Gil who prefers/needs to have the ball in their hands, a complimentary guard with some point skills, like Marko, is perhaps the best back court mate. (Think about the type of guards who lined up next to Jordan, Kobe, etc. on their championship runs.)

Versatility is part of Marko's charm and something to consider when comparing him to other players like Fifty. Right now, if the Wolves weren't rebuilding I wouldn't trade Marko. He may still have a somewhat negative trade value because of his contract but on the court, he has become an underrated asset.

I like Etan Thomas and the Wolves need help at center. I think a deal involving Thomas for Jaric would help both teams.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,827
And1: 19,938
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Marko would fit well with the Wiz. 

Post#10 » by shrink » Wed Jan 23, 2008 2:03 pm

GopherIt! wrote: I like Etan Thomas and the Wolves need help at center. I think a deal involving Thomas for Jaric would help both teams.


WAS posters have proposed an Etan-for-Marko switch for a long time, and MIN posters have routinely said "no." However, while Etan's still only a year shorter, we get closer and closer to that year. Al Jefferson needs to be paired with a center who will play defense and bang underneath, and regardless of the negatives people have about Etan, he's always had the heart to throw his body around. Maybe its time to look more closely.
legacyinthemakin89c
Veteran
Posts: 2,674
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 02, 2006

 

Post#11 » by legacyinthemakin89c » Wed Jan 23, 2008 2:11 pm

The Wiz are over performing right now without Arenas and a big reason for that is the chemistry this team shares with each other, I don't see any reason to alter that, especially in the starting lineup.
MN Die Hard
Analyst
Posts: 3,396
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: Marko would fit well with the Wiz. 

Post#12 » by MN Die Hard » Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:33 pm

shrink wrote:WAS posters have proposed an Etan-for-Marko switch for a long time, and MIN posters have routinely said "no."


I think most MN poster have declined that, and to tell the truth I dont know why. I would accept that offer in a heartbeat.
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 97,301
And1: 25,820
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

 

Post#13 » by hermes » Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:18 pm

wizards decline
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Wizards - Wolves 

Post#14 » by Ruzious » Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:44 pm

omeloon wrote:Jaric, Madsen, and Buckner

for

D. Stevenson and Etan Thomas (sit on IL, his contract expires year earlier than Jaric's)

Minny basically does this to save long term money and to open up a roster spot. Minny saves $2.5 mill this year and another $2.5 mill next season, which will help them re-sign some of their young players. Getting out of Jaric's contract will also help further down the line. Will free $8 mill from teh cap Jaric's last year on contract.

Washington does this because they need the depth. Jaric helps fills in for Arenas. Buckner provides some decent defense. They only lose one current rotation player.

Washington is right up to the lux tax - almost to the penny, so this would cost them the extra salary - doubled - plus losing lux tax proceeds. And it wouldn't improve the team - as Stevenson is a starter and fills his role beautifully.
GopherIt!
RealGM
Posts: 10,609
And1: 24,755
Joined: Oct 20, 2007
Location: bird watching
Contact:

ok... 

Post#15 » by GopherIt! » Thu Jan 24, 2008 3:56 am

Just responding to a couple posts...

Marko for Thomas shouldn't affect team chemistry negatively


Fair point on salary.

"it wouldn't improve the team - as Stevenson is a starter and fills his role beautifully."

So when Orlando gets Battie back and 6-10 Turky goes back to the two position are you going to send Stevenson in there to defend him?
yungal07
Banned User
Posts: 7,161
And1: 2
Joined: Feb 23, 2007
Location: The DMV

Re: ok... 

Post#16 » by yungal07 » Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:19 am

GopherIt! wrote:Just responding to a couple posts...

Marko for Thomas shouldn't affect team chemistry negatively


Fair point on salary.

"it wouldn't improve the team - as Stevenson is a starter and fills his role beautifully."

So when Orlando gets Battie back and 6-10 Turky goes back to the two position are you going to send Stevenson in there to defend him?


yes because the turk is soft and shoots mostly jumpshots. and marko would have a height disadvantage as well.

in conclusion, stevenson is a better defender and overall fit for the wizards.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,836
And1: 23,366
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: ok... 

Post#17 » by nate33 » Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:37 am

GopherIt! wrote:Just responding to a couple posts...

Marko for Thomas shouldn't affect team chemistry negatively


Fair point on salary.

"it wouldn't improve the team - as Stevenson is a starter and fills his role beautifully."

So when Orlando gets Battie back and 6-10 Turky goes back to the two position are you going to send Stevenson in there to defend him?

Stevenson could guard Turkaglu just as well as Jaric could. But that's not the point. Who cares about one specific matchup? I'd rather have Stevenson guarding the likes of Vince Carter, Joe Johnson, Ray Allen, Dwyane Wade, Rip Hamilton and every other good SG in the East.

Return to Trades and Transactions