LAC/POR

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

User avatar
SportsFan215
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,992
And1: 60
Joined: Jun 23, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

LAC/POR 

Post#1 » by SportsFan215 » Sun Apr 6, 2008 4:12 am

Maggette (S&T)/future Minn First for Jack/Webster/Frye/#13
User avatar
zong
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,290
And1: 102
Joined: Sep 27, 2007
Location: Toronto
       

 

Post#2 » by zong » Sun Apr 6, 2008 4:17 am

I think Portland would rather keep their players and good pick instead of screwing their 09 cap plan with Maggette and his deal
Jsun947
Analyst
Posts: 3,626
And1: 450
Joined: Jan 02, 2007

 

Post#3 » by Jsun947 » Sun Apr 6, 2008 6:08 am

Wow... Not only is that VASTLY overpaying for Maggette but it screws our cap plan too.

Maggette is not the answer at SF for Portland. We would rather keep Webster and NOT trade for him.
deviljets7
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,536
And1: 29
Joined: Feb 16, 2005

 

Post#4 » by deviljets7 » Sun Apr 6, 2008 6:36 am

I'm not saying the Blazers should necessarily make this trade, but I think the "screwing up the cap" comments are a little overblown IMO. How many guys that are set to become UFAs in the summer of 09 are better than Maggette? I know as of now guys like Okafor, Deng and Iggy are set to be UFAs then, but there's a pretty solid chance they all get locked up before then.
enetric wrote:You have the perfect fat% to sit on your butt, eat crap and WATCH someone else do it though. Hell, at that body fat% you might be a starter.
Spykes
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,738
And1: 16
Joined: Mar 15, 2004
Location: Paddy's Pub

 

Post#5 » by Spykes » Sun Apr 6, 2008 6:47 am

There are 2 questions I have about this deal...

First, what kind of deal is Maggette signing? I'm assuming it must start around 9 mil... Is that correct? I haven't really delved deep into the numbers yet, but I believe if the contract is structured properly, Portland can still have some cap space in 09.

Secondly, what's the restrictions on the "future Minn First". That's a fairly vague description of the asset.
SpyderRyder1
Sophomore
Posts: 198
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 19, 2007

 

Post#6 » by SpyderRyder1 » Sun Apr 6, 2008 6:53 am

This trade is improbable, as Maggette cannot be signed until July 1st almost a week after the draft.

So unless there is some sort of wink-wink draft pick that LAC asks Portland to make for them, the deal the pick to LAC. Why would Portland risk drafting a player that they may not want just to have a chance to get Maggette?
loflin3hree5ive
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,342
And1: 67
Joined: Aug 27, 2003
Location: Clipperland

 

Post#7 » by loflin3hree5ive » Sun Apr 6, 2008 6:54 am

Wolves pick is top ten protected through 2011. It's unprotected in 2012.
loflin3hree5ive
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,342
And1: 67
Joined: Aug 27, 2003
Location: Clipperland

 

Post#8 » by loflin3hree5ive » Sun Apr 6, 2008 6:56 am

SpyderRyder1 wrote:This trade is improbable, as Maggette cannot be signed until July 1st almost a week after the draft.

So unless there is some sort of wink-wink draft pick that LAC asks Portland to make for them, the deal the pick to LAC. Why would Portland risk drafting a player that they may not want just to have a chance to get Maggette?


This is true.

Return to Trades and Transactions