Denver Trade Breakdown
Incoming Players
Maceo Baston
Jamaal Tinsley
Marquis Daniels
Troy Murphy
Outgoing Players
Chucky Atkins
Steven Hunter
Kenyon Martin
Indiana Trade Breakdown
Incoming Players
Chucky Atkins
Steven Hunter
Kenyon Martin
Outgoing Players
Maceo Baston
Jamaal Tinsley
Marquis Daniels
Troy Murphy
Denver needs a bit more incentive for taking on Tinsley and with this expanded trade they get that in the expiring contracts of Daniels + Baston. By trading Kmart the Nuggets won't get too much extra salary in 2011 as both Murphy and Tinsley's contracts expire in the same year as Kmart.
And with Murphy's shooting range the Nuggets open up the lane for the other guys, while Daniels is a solid wing defender and Baston adds to their frontcourt depth.
Indiana solves the problem with their overcrowded roster with this deal and with Kmart they get a PF who improves their defense. He also looks to be a great fit on offense too, especially with TJ on the break.
Nuggets | Pacers ... expanding the Tinsley trade!
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Nuggets | Pacers ... expanding the Tinsley trade!
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,651
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 30, 2005
Re: Nuggets | Pacers ... expanding the Tinsley trade!
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,777
- And1: 9,690
- Joined: Jun 12, 2005
- Location: Philadelphia(ish)
-
Re: Nuggets | Pacers ... expanding the Tinsley trade!
I think if you replace Daniels and Baston with Rasho or Foster it's a pretty good deal. Otherwise this just makes the Nuggets frontcourt worse, while adding about $4M in payroll this year. After trading away Camby for cap relief, I can't really see them making that move.
Either that, or maybe remove Daniels, Baston and Hunter altogether.
Either that, or maybe remove Daniels, Baston and Hunter altogether.
Re: Nuggets | Pacers ... expanding the Tinsley trade!
-
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 45,496
- And1: 26,048
- Joined: Jun 29, 2006
-
Re: Nuggets | Pacers ... expanding the Tinsley trade!
There are rumblings (again) that a deal may happen early next week. Wait to see what falls out before you offer to take Kenyon Martin 

Re: Nuggets | Pacers ... expanding the Tinsley trade!
- Scoot McGroot
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 44,795
- And1: 14,068
- Joined: Feb 16, 2005
-
Re: Nuggets | Pacers ... expanding the Tinsley trade!
I could be convinced to do a Tinsley + Murphy for K-Mart deal. However, if that went down, why would we then offer to trade expiring contracts in Daniels and Baston for Hunter and Atkins?
Or, conversely, if we could possibly get Hunter + Atkins for Tinsley, why would we then take on a lot more money by swapping Murphy and an expiring in Daniels for K-Mart?
Or, conversely, if we could possibly get Hunter + Atkins for Tinsley, why would we then take on a lot more money by swapping Murphy and an expiring in Daniels for K-Mart?
Re: Nuggets | Pacers ... expanding the Tinsley trade!
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,885
- And1: 1,852
- Joined: Jul 16, 2008
-
Re: Nuggets | Pacers ... expanding the Tinsley trade!
Scoot McGroot wrote:I could be convinced to do a Tinsley + Murphy for K-Mart deal. However, if that went down, why would we then offer to trade expiring contracts in Daniels and Baston for Hunter and Atkins?
I HIGHLY doubt Denver would do that, as they would be taking on additional salary now and in the future. They've been trying to cut costs, and this would definitely be contradictory towards that goal.
With that said, I have been more open to doing a Tinsley and Murphy for K-Mart and Atkins/Hunter trade. Preferably Hunter, though. I think K-Mart would be a nice upgrade over Murph defensively, and he would be a nice fit with Ford and all the other pieces we have. The only problem is the possible negative influence he'd have on guys like Granger, Rush, Hibbert, etc. We don't need anything like that anymore, and that's exactly what we've been getting away from the past 3-4 years.
Return to Trades and Transactions