contract wrote:AirP. wrote:contract wrote:Dame didn't hurt their draft pick last season.
No? Why did they sit him the last 10 games so they could go 1-9 if he wasn't hurting their draft pick last year? Toss in trading a solid vet in Hart early February when they were just under .500 and maybe... they're a little better than what their record actually showed without tossing in the tanking aspect.
With the growth of their young players, the addition or a high level rookie in Scoot and also adding Murray with Lillard probably not willing to sit again (since it was rumored he sat to upgrade their draft asset to get him help), it's very possible this is a middle of the road team and with that, could be a little nervous about losing their top 14 protected pick to Chicago and at the very least not have a very good shot at being at the top of the draft which they tanked to do this last season.
I still don't understand why Portland didn't pivot to look to move Simons in a package to try to get some help for Lillard once they drafted Scoot.
They sat Dame because they were hopelessly out of the playoffs. That's hardly usual at the end of the season. I don't think trading 9 ppg Josh Hart had any impact on anything. They flipped a guy with an expiring deal and Duncan Robinson level production for a 1st round pick. It was a good move. Too bad we didn't do the same.
You mean offensive level production because he's a way better at basically everything else, especially on the defensive end. Yes, losing a good overall player hurt a middle of the road team. In fact, after trading Hart Portland went 6-21 for the rest of the season or 5-12 before they sat Lillard for the last 10 games.