twix2500 wrote:VaDe255 wrote:contract wrote:Be happy with this front office while we have it because there's no guarantee that the next one will be better or as good or even competent. The Arisons made a great hire when they brought in Pat Riley, but there's no way of knowing if that was a smart decision or just stupid luck. There's no way of knowing if they hired the best qualified guy or just the shiniest option available, because Pat was both.
The shiniest option may not be the right one next time.
The Terry trade and the way the Jimmy situation was handled were absolute missteps by the front office. It’s hard to "be happy" with them when recent decisions have clearly set the team back. Blind faith in continuity doesn’t mean much if the FO isn’t actively making the right moves. The enjoyment starts when they start making good decisions again; until then, skepticism is more than justified
I don't believe the Butler situation was a misstep at all. I assuming that you feel it would of been a good PR move to trade Jimmy without talking to him? You don't think many would be bashing the Heat. Look at the Mavs. You was not gonna get a haul for Butler. Most teams would not want to resign Butler at that price and that was the problem with trading him. Look at Clippers with Paul look at the Mavs with Luka. The NBA as a whole is trying to reduce salaries
The Butler situation was absolutely a misstep because the FO mismanaged his value and let the situation deteriorate. Instead of being proactive, whether by extending him on terms he would have accepted or exploring trades when his value was higher, they let things spiral. The 76ers were looking for a wing and had expirings plus picks on offer, it's clear that trade options existed.
What makes it worse is that they should have known how Butler operates. His behavioral patterns have been consistent throughout his career. When he feels undervalued or disrespected in contract talks, tension builds, and things eventually implode. We saw it in Chicago, Minnesota, and Philadelphia. They had the chance to get ahead of this and avoid the drama.
I wouldn’t have necessarily had the foresight to predict exactly how this would play out. But that’s the difference, good asset management should be expected from a FO. They’re paid to know their players and make these high-stakes decisions, so they should be held to a high standard.
Instead, they kept escalating the situation with suspensions and public tension, further driving down his value and making a trade even harder to navigate. By the time they finally moved him, the return was underwhelming. Had they handled things better, they could have secured a stronger package or reshaped the roster in a more meaningful way while avoiding all the drama. They backed themselves into a corner and had to settle; this was a clear failure in asset management.