kingjames623 wrote:It was amazing that we even had a chance after the first 17 minutes, but the game was essentially then. Were we seriously going to stop them from making runs the rest if the way? Stop them from hitting a couple of threes? There's no coming back from 25 down against them. They were 19 of mother **** 21 at one point and 7-7 threes. NOTHING matters after that. James's and Shard's shooting gave the chance to make it a game in the first place . Without that, we're down 35 at the half.
Bingo!
The Spurs had a historically great first half. As in, literally one of the best first halves ever, in terms of efficiency. I'm not sure what the Heat were suppose to do at that point. As 623 pointed out, when they're shooting at 90% efficiency there's basically nothing you can do. It sort of reminds me of the beginning of last year's Finals, when Danny Green and Gary Neal were unconscious on 3-pointers. Weren't they shooting a combined 75% of or something through the first few games?
Despite that first half, the Heat cut the lead to 7 at one point in the late 3rd/early 4th. You don't mount that kind of comeback without being "hungry". I'm impressed that they hung in there and made a game out of it. Sure, it ended up being lopsided in the end, but they were back in it there for a while.
Game 3 was sort of an aberration, in the sense that the Spurs absolutely cannot repeat that first-half performance. It won't happen again, it was just one of those special nights that can't be duplicated. We'll take Game 4... no doubt about it.