Grumpy Heat Fan wrote:If you want to criticize Arison... do it with another line of reasoning. Such as, the big 3 brought a lot of wealth to the Heat. Merchandise, ticket sales, and franchise valuation. Arison could have spent the $17 mil to keep the players happy. But the problem is, at the time, Miller was completely ineffective. ALWAYS INJURED, and then the Tax issue would be even worse the next season because Repeater Tax gets worse and worse.


And those were direct results of players taking paycuts. Those paycuts allowed the team to be better, which put more money into Arison's pockets.
So if you want to be anal about it, the paycuts didn't save Arison money, they MADE him money.
Either way, my point stands: the owners should be expected to at least match the financial sacrifices made by the players.
Otherwise, anyone asking only the players to take paycuts in order to win is a hypocrite.