ImageImageImage

David Aldridge Interview: Pat Riley

Moderators: KingDavid, heat4life, MettaWorldPanda, Wiltside, IggieCC, BFRESH44, QUIZ

User avatar
Bishop45
RealGM
Posts: 34,451
And1: 111,778
Joined: Apr 22, 2015
 

Re: David Aldridge Interview: Pat Riley 

Post#21 » by Bishop45 » Wed Nov 16, 2016 8:36 pm

Shewasfly wrote:
Bishop45 wrote:
Shewasfly wrote:
We did it in 2008-2010 and we had the best player in the league (or 2nd best before LeBron fans come interjecting). We are noticeably further away from even being a playoff team let alone a contender now, so why is this so much more irresponsible?

Maybe if we get a franchise player in the draft by the time they are ready to contribute to a contender, Whiteside will still only be 31 in a big man poor league. By then Winslow and J rich should be as developed as they are going to be as well. I don't see a downside to going through the draft, because I don't see how there is any other option with the potential to take us further faster. No superstar is coming here in FA, and unless you think we can trade Winslow, J Rich, TJ for a superstar, we may as well develop them internally.


What did we do in 2008-10? Did we trade any serviceable starters so we could tank? Wade was much younger than Whiteside and much closer in age with the rest of our core. And furthermore, never tanked. Whiteside at 31 could be multiple things, if we keep him here to tank until he's over 30 then we'd be wasting a huge asset to our rebuild... Wouldn't be the smartest plan for us.

Draft doesn't translate to ultimately getting a superstar, there's actually a more realistic shot at one through FA or through trade but okay


But you don't seem to realize we didn't have any serviceable starters to begin with because we were planning ahead. We did trade away Shaq and others because it wasn't a long term solution, even though with healthy Wade it would have been enough to keep us in the playoffs and maybe even competitive for another season or two. And we didn't tank because we couldn't have. Wade was that good. You take him out and those are 20 win, full fledged 'tank squad' teams, just like this current one except its like that with Dragic and Whiteside giving maybe 5-10 more wins to be generous.

You obviously think we have more of a realistic shot in FA than I do, because as is imo we don't have a good team and therefore no incentive for anyone to come. Its not like we're bad with Giannis or Westbrook on our team, we're bad with Dragic and Whiteside. What more can we offer than Boston can? And they are one of the worst of the teams that can go after FAs at the same time as us. I could understand if you were saying we should trade for a star, but you're saying if we trade Dragic for picks we may as well trade Whiteside for picks too and do some type of super rebuild. Makes no sense.


We traded Shaq for good players and obviously cause he wanted out and wasn't very effective anymore, not for Picks. We didn't leave Wade high and dry with nobody. Purposely trading serviceable starters for picks is tanking, furthermore tanking years of a top ten center on a good contract that would be more serviceable to our "Super-rebuild". What is a Super rebuild and how does it differ from a regular one, whatever that is

False equivalency, trading Dragic and/or Whiteside is borderline irresponsible

It's not about how much of a shot we have at FA, that chance is automatically better than the probability of getting a Superstar from the draft to turnout. It's basic logistic math
Long Live Winnie. Mamba siempre

Rest in Power Chadwick

#PeaceinGaza #FreedomforPalestine
User avatar
Mos_Heat
RealGM
Posts: 10,612
And1: 36,979
Joined: Jan 12, 2016
Location: Meh
 

Re: David Aldridge Interview: Pat Riley 

Post#22 » by Mos_Heat » Wed Nov 16, 2016 8:57 pm

Bishop45 wrote:
Shewasfly wrote:But you don't seem to realize we didn't have any serviceable starters to begin with because we were planning ahead. We did trade away Shaq and others because it wasn't a long term solution, even though with healthy Wade it would have been enough to keep us in the playoffs and maybe even competitive for another season or two. And we didn't tank because we couldn't have. Wade was that good. You take him out and those are 20 win, full fledged 'tank squad' teams, just like this current one except its like that with Dragic and Whiteside giving maybe 5-10 more wins to be generous.

You obviously think we have more of a realistic shot in FA than I do, because as is imo we don't have a good team and therefore no incentive for anyone to come. Its not like we're bad with Giannis or Westbrook on our team, we're bad with Dragic and Whiteside. What more can we offer than Boston can? And they are one of the worst of the teams that can go after FAs at the same time as us. I could understand if you were saying we should trade for a star, but you're saying if we trade Dragic for picks we may as well trade Whiteside for picks too and do some type of super rebuild. Makes no sense.


We traded Shaq for good players and obviously cause he wanted out and wasn't very effective anymore, not for Picks. We didn't leave Wade high and dry with nobody. Purposely trading serviceable starters for picks is tanking, furthermore tanking years of a top ten center on a good contract that would be more serviceable to our "Super-rebuild". What is a Super rebuild and how does it differ from a regular one, whatever that is

False equivalency, trading Dragic and/or Whiteside is borderline irresponsible

It's not about how much of a shot we have at FA, that chance is automatically better than the probability of getting a Superstar from the draft to turnout. It's basic logistic math

So, what's the strategy? Another whale hunt? Or you think, that we just need 2-3 good rotation players , and we are great again?
:reporter:
User avatar
Bishop45
RealGM
Posts: 34,451
And1: 111,778
Joined: Apr 22, 2015
 

Re: David Aldridge Interview: Pat Riley 

Post#23 » by Bishop45 » Wed Nov 16, 2016 9:06 pm

Mos_Heat wrote:
Bishop45 wrote:
Shewasfly wrote:But you don't seem to realize we didn't have any serviceable starters to begin with because we were planning ahead. We did trade away Shaq and others because it wasn't a long term solution, even though with healthy Wade it would have been enough to keep us in the playoffs and maybe even competitive for another season or two. And we didn't tank because we couldn't have. Wade was that good. You take him out and those are 20 win, full fledged 'tank squad' teams, just like this current one except its like that with Dragic and Whiteside giving maybe 5-10 more wins to be generous.

You obviously think we have more of a realistic shot in FA than I do, because as is imo we don't have a good team and therefore no incentive for anyone to come. Its not like we're bad with Giannis or Westbrook on our team, we're bad with Dragic and Whiteside. What more can we offer than Boston can? And they are one of the worst of the teams that can go after FAs at the same time as us. I could understand if you were saying we should trade for a star, but you're saying if we trade Dragic for picks we may as well trade Whiteside for picks too and do some type of super rebuild. Makes no sense.


We traded Shaq for good players and obviously cause he wanted out and wasn't very effective anymore, not for Picks. We didn't leave Wade high and dry with nobody. Purposely trading serviceable starters for picks is tanking, furthermore tanking years of a top ten center on a good contract that would be more serviceable to our "Super-rebuild". What is a Super rebuild and how does it differ from a regular one, whatever that is

False equivalency, trading Dragic and/or Whiteside is borderline irresponsible

It's not about how much of a shot we have at FA, that chance is automatically better than the probability of getting a Superstar from the draft to turnout. It's basic logistic math

So, what's the strategy? Another whale hunt? Or you think, that we just need 2-3 good rotation players , and we are great again?


FA, trade, draft like everybody else until we're w/o reason. We don't get to skip steps. If we're a lotto team because Dragic's not serviceable this season, go ahead and trade him
Long Live Winnie. Mamba siempre

Rest in Power Chadwick

#PeaceinGaza #FreedomforPalestine
User avatar
QUIZ
Forum Mod - Heat
Forum Mod - Heat
Posts: 32,014
And1: 78,769
Joined: Feb 02, 2014
Location: South Florida
Contact:
 

Re: David Aldridge Interview: Pat Riley 

Post#24 » by QUIZ » Wed Nov 16, 2016 9:10 pm

insfo wrote:Wait...so this is Quiz??

Image

That's not my twitter. Lol

I'm qjz123 on Twitter.

I'm also not white :)
Don’t let us get one. — Nikola Jovic

Dru Smith very lucky he got that 500k this year. He should invest and manage a subway after all this-MettaWorldPanda
User avatar
Shewasfly
General Manager
Posts: 8,126
And1: 13,725
Joined: Aug 05, 2014
   

Re: David Aldridge Interview: Pat Riley 

Post#25 » by Shewasfly » Wed Nov 16, 2016 11:09 pm

Bishop45 wrote:
Shewasfly wrote:
Bishop45 wrote:
What did we do in 2008-10? Did we trade any serviceable starters so we could tank? Wade was much younger than Whiteside and much closer in age with the rest of our core. And furthermore, never tanked. Whiteside at 31 could be multiple things, if we keep him here to tank until he's over 30 then we'd be wasting a huge asset to our rebuild... Wouldn't be the smartest plan for us.

Draft doesn't translate to ultimately getting a superstar, there's actually a more realistic shot at one through FA or through trade but okay


But you don't seem to realize we didn't have any serviceable starters to begin with because we were planning ahead. We did trade away Shaq and others because it wasn't a long term solution, even though with healthy Wade it would have been enough to keep us in the playoffs and maybe even competitive for another season or two. And we didn't tank because we couldn't have. Wade was that good. You take him out and those are 20 win, full fledged 'tank squad' teams, just like this current one except its like that with Dragic and Whiteside giving maybe 5-10 more wins to be generous.

You obviously think we have more of a realistic shot in FA than I do, because as is imo we don't have a good team and therefore no incentive for anyone to come. Its not like we're bad with Giannis or Westbrook on our team, we're bad with Dragic and Whiteside. What more can we offer than Boston can? And they are one of the worst of the teams that can go after FAs at the same time as us. I could understand if you were saying we should trade for a star, but you're saying if we trade Dragic for picks we may as well trade Whiteside for picks too and do some type of super rebuild. Makes no sense.


We traded Shaq for good players and obviously cause he wanted out and wasn't very effective anymore, not for Picks. We didn't leave Wade high and dry with nobody. Purposely trading serviceable starters for picks is tanking, furthermore tanking years of a top ten center on a good contract that would be more serviceable to our "Super-rebuild". What is a Super rebuild and how does it differ from a regular one, whatever that is

False equivalency, trading Dragic and/or Whiteside is borderline irresponsible

It's not about how much of a shot we have at FA, that chance is automatically better than the probability of getting a Superstar from the draft to turnout. It's basic logistic math


How serviceable if we're a lottery team with both of them on the roster? I actually agree that they're serviceable but it doesn't make trading one and not the other omg irresponsible. If we can see that Dragic doesn't makes sense for the future and we have better, younger options at PG that we can draft or trade for, I don't see the issue. I'd gladly take first round picks for Dragic. Not Whiteside but yes for Dragic. Those are assets in themselves that can be traded for a star.

And you can believe what you want about FA. Thats up to you. I don't think anybody is coming to this team as is.
Image
Saudades.
User avatar
goodboy
RealGM
Posts: 46,506
And1: 185,333
Joined: Aug 07, 2014
Location: disposal japanese worker
 

Re: David Aldridge Interview: Pat Riley 

Post#26 » by goodboy » Thu Nov 17, 2016 6:34 am

QUIZ wrote:
insfo wrote:Wait...so this is Quiz??

Image

That's not my twitter. Lol

I'm qjz123 on Twitter.

I'm also not white :)

Looks like a japanese disposable worker imho
Bright

Return to Miami Heat