3ammy3uck3ts wrote:carnageta wrote:3ammy3uck3ts wrote:
Rank them in order of what you’d prefer if you had to pick:
Herro 3/$150M
Monk 4/$77M
Reaves 4/$90M
Herro
Reaves
Monk
Reaves is better than Monk.
You would prefer Herro at $50M a year to Reaves at $22.5M? I agree Monk overall is a tier below them, Herro and Reaves are basically a wash
Dude, Herro is better than Austin. He's also 2 years younger.
Without Tyler Herro on the floor we had the absolute worst offense out of any team last season. He was our entire engine. Reaves has had the luxury to play alongside LeBron James, Anthony Davis, and now Luka Doncic - all of which are light years better offensively than Bam Adebayo and
regular season Jimmy Butler. Reaves has been the 3rd option behind 2 legit superstar players his entire career. Tyler has never had that luxury.
Herro makes 30m a season right now, and will for the next 2 seasons. He's not making 50m a year at this point. When it comes time to actually pay Tyler 50m/year he'll be as old as current day Austin Reaves and the salary cap at that point would have also risen significantly as well. 50m will be the new 37m. Herro should continue to improve as well and in 2 seasons he will be an even better player.
Also, Reaves isn't getting paid 22.5m / year. There's a reason he declined the 4 year 90/m contract extension with the Lakers. He's looking to get paid just as much as Tyler.