Enso wrote:Leonard can’t be traded
y?
Moderators: KingDavid, MettaWorldPanda, Wiltside, IggieCC, BFRESH44, QUIZ, heat4life
 
                                                                                                          Enso wrote:Leonard can’t be traded
 
                                      
                                                        
               Feel_the_Heat15 wrote:AirP. wrote:Feel_the_Heat15 wrote:
It's kind of irrelevant whether or not he's making 3s while being guarded or open.
It absolutely is relevant, it can limit what can and can't be done on the court. A shooter like Waiters doesn't really drop all that significantly with a defender close to him vs a guy like Winslow who has to be open, that changes your option on offense on where you place him to stretch out the court. A 3pt shooter may move to a less open spot to manipulate the defense to try to give a playmaker more room to operate in a specific area of the court. Also, a guy who can only shoot 3s well wide open has to be "open" so a defender doesn't have to worry about him as much, the defender can play the angles much better if he's is watching the passing lanes to the limited shooter. All these strengths and weaknesses can greatly alter options in offense and defense.
You don't get more points for shooting unguarded 3s vs shooting guarded 3s. You're basically arguing that Winslow isn't a 3-point threat because he doesn't attempt 7 3s a game. Also, you're wrong about a defender not having to worry about Winslow shooting 3s because he only shoots open 3s well. If Winslow's shooting 45% on open 3s, defenders will be MORE inclined to worry about him being open not less.
Think about this, Player A and B attempt 5 3s per 36 minutes. Player A shoots 36% from 3 but 34% on guarded 3s. Player B shoots 38% from 3 but 32% on guarded 3s. Who's the better 3-point shooter? Obviously player B.

 
                    
                    
                    
                                                    Enso wrote:twix2500 wrote:Enso wrote:
No as in not legal or no as in fak cp3
Not legal
Thank you for both your insight and vagueness in that original post
 
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                
 Bishop45 wrote:Enso wrote:Leonard can’t be traded
y?
 
                                                                          
                    
               
 
                    
                    
                    
                                                    fishfuego. wrote:Feel_the_Heat15 wrote:AirP. wrote:It absolutely is relevant, it can limit what can and can't be done on the court. A shooter like Waiters doesn't really drop all that significantly with a defender close to him vs a guy like Winslow who has to be open, that changes your option on offense on where you place him to stretch out the court. A 3pt shooter may move to a less open spot to manipulate the defense to try to give a playmaker more room to operate in a specific area of the court. Also, a guy who can only shoot 3s well wide open has to be "open" so a defender doesn't have to worry about him as much, the defender can play the angles much better if he's is watching the passing lanes to the limited shooter. All these strengths and weaknesses can greatly alter options in offense and defense.
You don't get more points for shooting unguarded 3s vs shooting guarded 3s. You're basically arguing that Winslow isn't a 3-point threat because he doesn't attempt 7 3s a game. Also, you're wrong about a defender not having to worry about Winslow shooting 3s because he only shoots open 3s well. If Winslow's shooting 45% on open 3s, defenders will be MORE inclined to worry about him being open not less.
Think about this, Player A and B attempt 5 3s per 36 minutes. Player A shoots 36% from 3 but 34% on guarded 3s. Player B shoots 38% from 3 but 32% on guarded 3s. Who's the better 3-point shooter? Obviously player B.
But the point is a good defensive team has more options to cheat when a player needs space to shoot. That is nothing new.
 
                    
                    
                    
                                                    gom wrote:Are you guys seriously thinking Chris Paul, at 36 years-old, will give up a player option worth $44,211,146? That's nonsense. He's getting his money.
 
                                                                                                           
                                                                          
                    
               Feel_the_Heat15 wrote:gom wrote:Are you guys seriously thinking Chris Paul, at 36 years-old, will give up a player option worth $44,211,146? That's nonsense. He's getting his money.
If we promise to give him a 3 year $90,000,000 contract, yes.

gom wrote:Are you guys seriously thinking Chris Paul, at 36 years-old, will give up a player option worth $44,211,146? That's nonsense. He's getting his money.

 
                    
                    
                    
                                                    gom wrote:Are you guys seriously thinking Chris Paul, at 36 years-old, will give up a player option worth $44,211,146? That's nonsense. He's getting his money.
 
                                                                                                          gom wrote:Feel_the_Heat15 wrote:gom wrote:Are you guys seriously thinking Chris Paul, at 36 years-old, will give up a player option worth $44,211,146? That's nonsense. He's getting his money.
If we promise to give him a 3 year $90,000,000 contract, yes.
So you'll pay a 39 year-old $30,000,000. ok...
fishfuego. wrote:It would be a mistake for Miami to trade assets with OKC as a lateral movement. IMO is not straight up better than players such as Dragic, Waiters and such. At this point he is just a name with a huge contract and not much more.
 
                                                                                                          
 
                    
                    
                                                        
               gom wrote:Are you guys seriously thinking Chris Paul, at 36 years-old, will give up a player option worth $44,211,146? That's nonsense. He's getting his money.
 
                    
                    
                    
                                      
               
 
                                      
                                                        
               HIF wrote:I would like to keep Leonard!
 
                                      
                                                        
               JustiseForMiami wrote:Hey guys. Did I miss Anything today?
Y’all are like family to me and there aren’t many people in my life I have to share huge news with. I passed a huge certification exam for my line of work today that I have been stressing over in and out of heat drama for a couple months.
Thanks so much to all of you for keeping me sane through this process. Except for HeatLanta, I hate you. You stress me out.
 
                                      
                                                        
               Bishop45 wrote:Enso wrote:Leonard can’t be traded
y?