AirP. wrote:He wasn't looking to score when he had that TO, before this series that would have been a step back jumper. It was a 1 point game and he was STILL looking to pass the whole play.
Should have called a timeout.
Moderators: KingDavid, BFRESH44, MettaWorldPanda, Wiltside, heat4life, QUIZ, IggieCC

AirP. wrote:He wasn't looking to score when he had that TO, before this series that would have been a step back jumper. It was a 1 point game and he was STILL looking to pass the whole play.

Shewasfly wrote:Big off season for Pat coming up now.
Spo has shown what he can do with literally nothing. Now let's see what Riley can do to give him more to work with.

Lilseb93 wrote:Jimmy is only going to get worse with age. That's why we desperately need a #1 scoring option on this team.
marson wrote:Spacely wrote:Y’all think we would’ve beat the Lakers if they made it
Absolutely. Anyone in the west not named the Nuggets, we would've out-toughed them.
DayofMourning wrote:Lilseb93 wrote:DayofMourning wrote:
Boston is a legit gripe.
Lakers??? We lost Bam and Goran. No chance. Lets not rewrite history.
The shooters went cold in that series is what I'm saying. Unless I'm totally misremembering.
Its a domino effect. You take out our top scorer, then our defensive hub.....role playing shooters cant compensate for that. Its a delicate balance. Inuries suck so bad. Luck is what you need. With luck, Hakeem wins more chips than Jordan.

Rapaz wrote:
This is an NBA franchise, not a disadvantaged youth organization. No one is going to feel sorry for you for being undermanned. Improve the team.
Spacely wrote:Y’all think we would’ve beat the Lakers if they made it
ShulaDon92 wrote:TroubleS0me wrote:ShulaDon92 wrote:
He's clearly cooked. It's obvious
Look at the knee buckling
-SHULA
I still think about that 3 he took vs Celtics last year in ECF, when he could have drive to the basket
He wasn't hurt then
I accepted that shot. It didn't go. F it
You crazy trolling now bringing this up lol
-SHULA

goodboy wrote:Rapaz wrote:
This is an NBA franchise, not a disadvantaged youth organization. No one is going to feel sorry for you for being undermanned. Improve the team.
Yeah seems like a pity party group meeting. Or tryna secure that 20mill a year contract. But we will.
Lilseb93 wrote:Jimmy is only going to get worse with age. That's why we desperately need a #1 scoring option on this team.

Rapaz wrote:
This is an NBA franchise, not a disadvantaged youth organization. No one is going to feel sorry for you for being undermanned. Improve the team.
Cmon_Son-_- wrote:marson wrote:Spacely wrote:Y’all think we would’ve beat the Lakers if they made it
Absolutely. Anyone in the west not named the Nuggets, we would've out-toughed them.
Denver aint out tough us. They out talented us. Which what we saw from Jimmy don't think we would've been the Lakers either
jele wrote:RRR3 wrote:Beenie wrote:
Both were bad.
I said it.
Can you?
Bam's defensive impact was pretty massive, he had a good game overall. Also got whacked with no call a few times which hurts his efficiency.
He played hard but offensively he is too limited. I know he is great on defense but it's very hard to win when your max players are not capable of scoring 30 plus. I am tired of people giving him a pass only because he is a great defender. He needs to be great on both ends of the floor. 20 points is just not good enough.
Shewasfly wrote:I guess we're all supposed to give props to Denver and all, but Jokic is not likeable. Sorry he's not. Neither is Murray's front running ass.
Much respect to the rest of their team though. Gordon especially showed me something. Happy for him and the rest of their guys.
Shewasfly wrote:I guess we're all supposed to give props to Denver and all, but Jokic is not likeable. Sorry he's not. Neither is Murray's front running ass.
Much respect to the rest of their team though. Gordon especially showed me something. Happy for him and the rest of their guys.