AirP. wrote:BFRESH44 wrote:AirP. wrote:And Minnesota fans have seen Wiggins have great games here and there, hell, he got hot and beat Miami this year. What's your point, players can have great games here and there?
And let's not draw parallels between Justise Winslow and Andrew Wiggins. First of all one of those is an excellent defender and competes his ass off, and is on a 3 year 33 million extension. The other is a 6'8' Dion Waiters on a max deal. It's not the same.
Justise Winslow finished last year as a top 6 small forward in DRPM. He's one of the best wing defenders in basketball. That is not an opinion, that is a fact backed by data. Andrew Wiggins is not tops in anything. And is paid like a superstar.
Absolutely, Justise is in a different world vs Wiggins on defense, I'll take Justice over Wiggins as a player every time even if they were paid the same. I compare them because a certain portion of the fan base seem to put so much hope into a player that they refuse to see the overall player instead of the glimmer of light in hopes they're finally becoming a good or great player. Yes Justice will have great games, but not all that often and when you look at the advanced numbers you see how often that really is.
If Justice had a history of being a more efficient scorer you give him the benefit of the doubt, but in his 5th year he's not even gotten close to NBA average efficiency.
I actually like Justice, but if you're wanting to go deep into the playoffs or get to the finals, you have to fix inefficiencies or find a way to hide them. Justice being a PG means he's going to end up shooting more. He shot nearly 14 FGA/36 last year and this year his FGA/36 rate is higher than that.
The real question is, with the starters do you want 3 shooters(Justice and Bam as non shooters) on the court or can Nunn, Butler, and Bam's playmaking be enough with 4 shooters(just Bam as a non shooter) on the court?
Advanced numbers will tell you James Harden is the best scorer to ever play the game. Even better than Michael Jordan. But we all know that's ****, right?
Because what they won't tell you is that he has no in-between game, no ability to post-up, takes very few mid range shots, and that he is heavily reliant on foul shooting and ref manipulation. And that's why when good defensive teams key on the 3 point line and deny the paint, he comes up lame so many times because he has no counter to that style of play.
You can't reduce a player down to his true shooting percentage. There are too many other factors to account for that help contribute to winning basketball. And Justise Winslow is always going to be nothing more than an opportunistic scorer. Volume scoring is not his game. When the right match-up is there, he'll take advantage. Just like he took advantage of Ja Morant opening night, bullying him in the post. Focus on his strengths. He's a good player, on a good contract.





















