CrossOver wrote:
good
Moderators: KingDavid, MettaWorldPanda, Wiltside, IggieCC, BFRESH44, QUIZ, heat4life
Chalm Downs wrote:his nickname is boywonder ffs
SerialChiller wrote:3ammy3uck3ts wrote:SerialChiller wrote:All I want to see now is to trade Rozier and Wiggins. Rozier only has value as an expiring and Wiggins might net a young player or draft pick, but get rid of these 2 highly paid 30+ year olds who don't fit in our future plans and only serve to take minutes away from the young guys. Kyle Anderson can go too, but might have to wait till next offseason when he's set to be on an expiring deal then. Go into this developmental/tank season looking something like this...
PG - Davion Mitchell / Kasparas Jakucionis / Dru Smith
SG - Tyler Herro / Pelle Larsson / Alec Burks
SF - Haywood Highsmith / Jaimi Jaquez Jr. / Kyle Anderson
PF - Bam Adebayo / Nikola Jovic / Keshad Johnson
C - Kel'el Ware / Vladislav Goldin / Kevin Love
I’m starting to feel good about being able to get a 1st for Wiggins
I'm not so sure about that but it would be nice! I just can't wait to have clean books for the team to work with again. Without him we only have on the books for the year after next (26-27):
Bam $48M
Herro $33M
Mitchell $12M
Ware $4.6M (team option)
JJJ $5.9M (team option)
Larsson $2.3M (team option)
and Anderson $9.6M (can use as expiring in a trade) along with Wiggins I guess if we don't manage to move him and he accepts his $30M player option.
RexBoyWonder wrote:I don't really get the appeal of Collins, NAW, these kind of guy.
You might like some more others, but what purpose do they fill here? They're not young, don't have any upside, by the time we'll be back to contention they'll be even older.
It's all about upside, young guys that can grow, guys that could be had on team friendly contracts.
Why are we targeting supporting players when we don't have any main guys to support?
RexBoyWonder wrote:I don't really get the appeal of Collins, NAW, these kind of guy.
You might like some more others, but what purpose do they fill here? They're not young, don't have any upside, by the time we'll be back to contention they'll be even older.
It's all about upside, young guys that can grow, guys that could be had on team friendly contracts.
Why are we targeting supporting players when we don't have any main guys to support?
RexBoyWonder wrote:
Why are we targeting supporting players when we don't have any main guys to support?
3ammy3uck3ts wrote:greg4012 wrote:
Miami and GS were the only 2 top-10 defenses this season that had more than two of their top 8 minute getters to grade out with a negative DBPM.
For GS, it was Wiggins (-0.4), Hield (-0.3) and Kuminga (-0.1).
For Miami, it was Duncan (-1.1), Rozier (-1.0) and Herro (-0.7). Notable that Wiggins also netted a negative DBPM during his time with Miami (-0.1).
Every other top 10 defense had no more than 2 players among their top 8 minute getters with a negative DBPM.
If you look exclusively at the top 8 minute getters for each of the top 10 defenses in the NBA, those with the worst DBPM would rank as follows:
Malik Beasley (-1.2)
Duncan Robinson (-1.1)
Terry Rozer (-1.0)
Darius Garland (-0.8)
Tyler Herro (-0.7)
Jaylen Brown (-0.5)
Andrew Wiggins (-0.4)
Miami lays claim to half the list (among 10 teams). It's a minor miracle that Miami was still able to field a top 10 defense.
Based on what we’ve seen so far the market seems to be shifting for one dimensional scorers with teams tossing them around and interest picking up on hustle guys who play both sides of the ball. The importance of Nesmith Nembhard Caruso dort etc in these last playoffs is probably the cause. You can get by with 1 maybe 2 bad defenders but they better be contributing at a very high level offensively
greg4012 wrote:
Miami and GS were the only 2 top-10 defenses this season that had more than two of their top 8 minute getters to grade out with a negative DBPM.
For GS, it was Wiggins (-0.4), Hield (-0.3) and Kuminga (-0.1).
For Miami, it was Duncan (-1.1), Rozier (-1.0) and Herro (-0.7). Notable that Wiggins also netted a negative DBPM during his time with Miami (-0.1).
Every other top 10 defense had no more than 2 players among their top 8 minute getters with a negative DBPM.
If you look exclusively at the top 8 minute getters for each of the top 10 defenses in the NBA, those with the worst DBPM would rank as follows:
Malik Beasley (-1.2)
Duncan Robinson (-1.1)
Terry Rozer (-1.0)
Darius Garland (-0.8)
Tyler Herro (-0.7)
Jaylen Brown (-0.5)
Andrew Wiggins (-0.4)
Miami lays claim to half the list (among 10 teams). It's a minor miracle that Miami was still able to field a top 10 defense.
RexBoyWonder wrote:I don't really get the appeal of Collins, NAW, these kind of guy.
You might like some more others, but what purpose do they fill here? They're not young, don't have any upside, by the time we'll be back to contention they'll be even older.
It's all about upside, young guys that can grow, guys that could be had on team friendly contracts.
Why are we targeting supporting players when we don't have any main guys to support?
twix2500 wrote:3ammy3uck3ts wrote:greg4012 wrote:
Miami and GS were the only 2 top-10 defenses this season that had more than two of their top 8 minute getters to grade out with a negative DBPM.
For GS, it was Wiggins (-0.4), Hield (-0.3) and Kuminga (-0.1).
For Miami, it was Duncan (-1.1), Rozier (-1.0) and Herro (-0.7). Notable that Wiggins also netted a negative DBPM during his time with Miami (-0.1).
Every other top 10 defense had no more than 2 players among their top 8 minute getters with a negative DBPM.
If you look exclusively at the top 8 minute getters for each of the top 10 defenses in the NBA, those with the worst DBPM would rank as follows:
Malik Beasley (-1.2)
Duncan Robinson (-1.1)
Terry Rozer (-1.0)
Darius Garland (-0.8)
Tyler Herro (-0.7)
Jaylen Brown (-0.5)
Andrew Wiggins (-0.4)
Miami lays claim to half the list (among 10 teams). It's a minor miracle that Miami was still able to field a top 10 defense.
Based on what we’ve seen so far the market seems to be shifting for one dimensional scorers with teams tossing them around and interest picking up on hustle guys who play both sides of the ball. The importance of Nesmith Nembhard Caruso dort etc in these last playoffs is probably the cause. You can get by with 1 maybe 2 bad defenders but they better be contributing at a very high level offensively
You dont build your team how another team build their teams. Copy cats are for losers. You build your team accordingly to the players you are building around.
RexBoyWonder wrote:I don't really get the appeal of Collins, NAW, these kind of guy.
You might like some more others, but what purpose do they fill here? They're not young, don't have any upside, by the time we'll be back to contention they'll be even older.
It's all about upside, young guys that can grow, guys that could be had on team friendly contracts.
Why are we targeting supporting players when we don't have any main guys to support?
3ammy3uck3ts wrote:twix2500 wrote:3ammy3uck3ts wrote:
Based on what we’ve seen so far the market seems to be shifting for one dimensional scorers with teams tossing them around and interest picking up on hustle guys who play both sides of the ball. The importance of Nesmith Nembhard Caruso dort etc in these last playoffs is probably the cause. You can get by with 1 maybe 2 bad defenders but they better be contributing at a very high level offensively
You dont build your team how another team build their teams. Copy cats are for losers. You build your team accordingly to the players you are building around.
You need unique pieces for sure, that’s what makes teams special. There are certain archetypes of players who can make an impact in the playoffs though and help raise your ceiling, you have to have 2 way dawgs.

SerialChiller wrote:RexBoyWonder wrote:I don't really get the appeal of Collins, NAW, these kind of guy.
You might like some more others, but what purpose do they fill here? They're not young, don't have any upside, by the time we'll be back to contention they'll be even older.
It's all about upside, young guys that can grow, guys that could be had on team friendly contracts.
Why are we targeting supporting players when we don't have any main guys to support?
Exactly, guys like that are only useful if you have Jimmy or Durant already and are going all in. We obviously aren't so lets forget about that kind of stuff for now. Have a developmental year where we also own our own pick and have clean books to then go and resume star hunting again next offseason.
RexBoyWonder wrote:I don't really get the appeal of Collins, NAW, these kind of guy.
You might like some more others, but what purpose do they fill here? They're not young, don't have any upside, by the time we'll be back to contention they'll be even older.
It's all about upside, young guys that can grow, guys that could be had on team friendly contracts.
Why are we targeting supporting players when we don't have any main guys to support?
fincane30 wrote:SerialChiller wrote:RexBoyWonder wrote:I don't really get the appeal of Collins, NAW, these kind of guy.
You might like some more others, but what purpose do they fill here? They're not young, don't have any upside, by the time we'll be back to contention they'll be even older.
It's all about upside, young guys that can grow, guys that could be had on team friendly contracts.
Why are we targeting supporting players when we don't have any main guys to support?
Exactly, guys like that are only useful if you have Jimmy or Durant already and are going all in. We obviously aren't so lets forget about that kind of stuff for now. Have a developmental year where we also own our own pick and have clean books to then go and resume star hunting again next offseason.
Well John Collins is an expiring. So he wouldn't be messing up any books. And it is in the Heat's best interest to be competent this season if star chasing is in the plans. Stars don't join bad teams. You can't swap out your entire roster so guys have to play well enough to attract a hypothetical star. Being an absolute dumpster isn't gonna cut it. One of the reasons Kevin Durant and subsequently Kyrie Irving chose the Nets is because they saw a team with guys who finished above .500 the year before and made the playoffs. And with the prospect of a star reaching FA unlikely you're probably using that 2026 pick in the star trade anyway. Likely something close to the KD trade. Where it couldn't become official until the new league year.