unowen85 wrote:Quite frankly, if he leaves, he's worse than Martin.
Here's an argument we all used in 2010:
He's a grown man and a free agent, therefore he can do whatever he feels will make he and his family happy. This is a business and whatever decision he makes will be a business one. Simple as that. Far too often we confuse professional sports in this country with federal, state, and local government in that we think employees of these franchises are obligated to explain themselves to us.
They don't. LeBron has nothing he has to say to anyone about whatever decision he makes. If he leaves, he leaves. Who are we to judge a man's media-fabricated "legacy" all because they make a decision that's not to our liking? We're no better than the bitter former players of yesteryear that feel as though LeBron is required by law to follow the same business path that they did. Enough with this nonsense.
The Miami HEAT have a wonderful attraction here. As with any other business, if there is a more favorable environment elsewhere to success, the business will move. The business doesn't owe the people anything. The government does. So if the business moves, it's doing what the business must do to survive and thrive for as long as the business is within its window of production, which for basketball players is less than 20 years.
It's time for us to open our eyes.