CrossOver wrote:contract wrote:AirP. wrote:
What? The NBA can't veto a trade unless that all parties of the trade agree to it.
David Stern veto'd the CP3 to Lakers trade because enough owners pushed him to veto it, the same thing will happen with Miami and Lillard, it's time to move on and let Portland waste a rebuilding season by keeping Lillard. Lillard should have pushed for a no trade clause vs trust a team. If I'm a player and seen what's happened with Lillard being loyal, I'd have 0 loyalty to any team since they can just trade you wherever they want. Top players should just keep signing 1+1s or 2+1 if the team won't have Bird rights to continue to have some power in team building.
Lillard's agent should have pushed for the clause. He dropped the ball if he didn't. And if he did and the Blazers said no, then that should have set off every alarm.
Even the best players in the world don't get No trade clauses. The Beal one was Washington being beyond stupid and that was proven this off-season.
Generally ... but the Dame/Blazers relationship was supposed to be a lifetime love affair. Blazers Lifer and all that jazz.













