twix2500 wrote:AirP. wrote:twix2500 wrote:?t=UkKB3qqP6wahTJxq1eZ2BQ&s=19
Looks at the GRAVITY Robinson gets. Rather you appreciate his game or not, opponents do.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
It's an inbound play on the side of the basket, everyone gets covered like that.
What's not talked about his "gravity" is that when he has the ball a defender can play as tight as they want on him because they don't fear him getting past him and attacking the basket.
Duncan does have "gravity" in the offense, but so does really any 3pt shooter and if a 3pt shooter doesn't have much gravity that should help the offense by giving that 3pt shooter more open looks.
The thing Duncan has over the other 3pt shooters on the team is that he's good at working with screens to help tire defenders later in the game while a guy like Strus is able to find seams open spots vs working screens as much to be available for passes and shots. I personally would go with Strus but understand the thought of going with Duncan, especially with Spoelstra having such a strong voice in his development to get him into the starting lineup 3 seasons ago.
Oh boy you do not understand the importance of his gravity in this team's concept. And Any shooter doesn't have gravity. The point of his gravity is to allow the scorers who thrive at scoring in the paint by having SPACE in the paint, those scorers are Bam and Bulter. Which is half the strategy of Spo "Space and Pace" philosophy (originally designed for James and Wade). The WHOLE point is to allow Butler and Bam to carry the offensive load efficiently. The team and system is built around Bulter and Bam. The Heat want Duncan to pull defenders out from the paint, that is his PRIMARY responsibility
Let me back up and explain the theory of "Space" in Hoops. In basketball the more players on the court the harder it is to score. The less players on the court the easier it is to score. Because there is SPACE to operate. 4 on 4 is easier to score than 5 on 5. Because of Duncan's defender follows him beyond the 3 pt line it allows the Heat to play 4 on 4. And at times 3 on 4 Because Duncan at times draws 2 defenders out beyond the 3 pt line. The system is not meant for him to be the leading scorer, its to manipulate the defense that will allow the offense to score more efficiently with Bam and Butler. Also cutters now have room to operate. That is Duncans primary responsibility.
It makes a difference in this offense as a whole at being effective. Last year playoffs when the Heat played Bucks. Was an example of lack of gravity. Bam could not draw his defender to him, his defender would back off of him and decided to take space away from Bam's teammates to score around the rim, specifically Butler. Basically change the game to 4 on 5. Bucks were able to successfully do so, because Bam lacked the willingness to score. He took himself out of being a threat thus his defender didnt have to count for him. That is why I harped on Bam aggressiveness, because the system is built for him to take shots and carry the scoring load.
You and others are evaluating Duncan as an individual scorer. That is not the main objective in the role that Duncan has in this system. This is not the Princeton offense where everyone has equal opportunity to take the same amount of shots. Duncan only has about 10 available shots a game designated to him. Ideally you like for him to be getting 14-15 pts a game on those available shots. Since he got out of that bad funk in November, Robinson is averaging 12.3 on 9.7 shots. IMO that is below where I think the team needs him to be (14 pts preferably on those number of fga's).
Let's compare him to Herro, which the scheme is to get Herro a high number of shots with complementary players with the second unit. Herro is only scoring 20.0 pts on 17.6 shots. 2.4 points more than his attempts (ORTG 103). Duncan is scoring 2.6 points more than his attempts (ORTG 111). Duncan is doing better than Herro with his attempts. This is why 3ammy is complaining about Herro. His rate of scoring for number of shots he takes is not good.
However I know I am not gonna change AirP mind, because fundamentally he has an extremely high expectation for someone making 15 million a year than what I expect.
I like your points here. Whats a good points per attempt number? Curious