AirP. wrote:Beenie wrote:AirP. wrote:Spoiler:
If they believe Swider is the next Duncan/Strus clone then moving Duncan makes sense.
Without an off ball sharpshooter on the team, I don’t see Duncan as being expendable.
You can find 3pt specialist which would help your team more by saving a ton of money and having a spot up shooter. For me, having a choice between Robinson at 19 million or say paying a guy like M.Beasley near the minimum or let's go a little crazy, go up to near the MLE at 13 million, I'm going with the cheaper option, saving at least 6 million a year for your sharpshooter which could be utilized elsewhere on the roster, for example, being able to retain Martin next season if you really like him.
Right now, Robinson is making close to 19 mil a year, this quite possibly new level he's playing at is where he needs to continue to play at to make his salary not a negative but if scouting reports change or someone figures out how to slow him up he'll be back to being a negative contract on the roster. If I can move him in some package for a player I want and have more faith in I'm making that move and trying to find another cheaper 3pt shooter to replace him.
I’m all for finding value contracts particularly for specialist roles.
But it seems you are lookin towards the offseason for a replacement.
If trading Duncan now in the hypothetical DFS deal as an example or any other deal means that the team is without an off ball 3 point specialist for the remainder of the year then I wouldn’t expect the team to execute such a deal.
























