King_John wrote:I have a feeling we ll lose that game...don t know why
got a lot of **** for saying that. Obviously my lack of confidence as others described it wasn t so wrong.
Moderators: KingDavid, MettaWorldPanda, Wiltside, IggieCC, BFRESH44, QUIZ, heat4life
King_John wrote:I have a feeling we ll lose that game...don t know why
Vertical Limit wrote:The whole second half was just moronic play one after another. We deserved to lose and happy that we lost in overtime too, maybe those extra minutes is a lesson learned to take care of business in regulation. On to the next one.

King_John wrote:King_John wrote:I have a feeling we ll lose that game...don t know why
got a lot of **** for saying that. Obviously my lack of confidence as others described it wasn t so wrong.
The Bunk wrote:God I hate this fraudulent clown.
I've never wanted to punch someone in the face so badly. Really hoping to run into him at a game one day. I won't hesitate.
Slot Machine wrote:King_John wrote:King_John wrote:I have a feeling we ll lose that game...don t know why
got a lot of **** for saying that. Obviously my lack of confidence as others described it wasn t so wrong.
People would be more impressed if you didn't say that every game.

Yaphet Kotto wrote:G-Menn wrote:Watching that flagrant one is givin me a headache. Shot clock was down to 2, and bosh blocked isiah Thomas 3. Chalmers is just beyond stupid.
How many brain farts are we gonna ignore?
For Spo, apparently all of them.
He continues to start him ad nauseum and he contnues to cost us games and crucial seeding position, ad nauseum.
Dont blame rio for being (Please Use More Appropriate Word), blame the (Please Use More Appropriate Word) who keeps starting him and logging him heavy minutes.
Pacerlive wrote:Yaphet Kotto wrote:G-Menn wrote:Watching that flagrant one is givin me a headache. Shot clock was down to 2, and bosh blocked isiah Thomas 3. Chalmers is just beyond stupid.
How many brain farts are we gonna ignore?
For Spo, apparently all of them.
He continues to start him ad nauseum and he contnues to cost us games and crucial seeding position, ad nauseum.
Dont blame rio for being (Please Use More Appropriate Word), blame the (Please Use More Appropriate Word) who keeps starting him and logging him heavy minutes.
For what Rio cost in salary you guys sure have a way of picking on one of your best defenders. The guy is .77 in opponents PPP which is best on the team when you factor in minutes.
Maroko wrote:Pacerlive wrote:Yaphet Kotto wrote:For Spo, apparently all of them.
He continues to start him ad nauseum and he contnues to cost us games and crucial seeding position, ad nauseum.
Dont blame rio for being (Please Use More Appropriate Word), blame the (Please Use More Appropriate Word) who keeps starting him and logging him heavy minutes.
For what Rio cost in salary you guys sure have a way of picking on one of your best defenders. The guy is .77 in opponents PPP which is best on the team when you factor in minutes.
It's because the miami heat system is too put a lot of pressure on the opponent point guard but as soon as you live Mario in a one and one situation, it's a disaster ! Jeff Teague is a little example .
He is more a shooting guard than a point guard. Yes he had his moments with huge 3 but man in my opinion his mistakes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his good moment
it reminds me of Kobe : The whole game he will be like 4/21 then he hit the last shot and people will completly forget the previous shot and say "SEE HOW HE IS CLUTCH" but i would rather say, they could have won with a huge marge if he was taken care of his shot's selection
WD wrote:After watching the game again this morning, I'll ask 2 questions.
The questions are, would you trade Lebrons dunk for Chalmers flagrant foul? and Where is the maintenance program for LBJ.?
Just win tonight with or without lbj
King_John wrote:WD wrote:After watching the game again this morning, I'll ask 2 questions.
The questions are, would you trade Lebrons dunk for Chalmers flagrant foul? and Where is the maintenance program for LBJ.?
Just win tonight with or without lbj
As if we would win without LeBron in Portland.

S Curry wrote:**** I knew it will be hard to win both SAC games, there goes our record, and with Lebron injury there goes our chance of getting HCA against Indy
WD wrote:King_John wrote:WD wrote:After watching the game again this morning, I'll ask 2 questions.
The questions are, would you trade Lebrons dunk for Chalmers flagrant foul? and Where is the maintenance program for LBJ.?
Just win tonight with or without lbj
As if we would win without LeBron in Portland.
You are making my OVERALL point, we should be able to win WITHOUT LBJ in some of these games. That's the OFFENSIVE adjustments I have been referring to. We can't/shouldn't just rely on LBJ to have a "monster/balls to the walls" game in order to win.
Just win tonight
King_John wrote:WD wrote:King_John wrote:
As if we would win without LeBron in Portland.
You are making my OVERALL point, we should be able to win WITHOUT LBJ in some of these games. That's the OFFENSIVE adjustments I have been referring to. We can't/shouldn't just rely on LBJ to have a "monster/balls to the walls" game in order to win.
Just win tonight
this team is way to dependent on LeBron to carry most of the load. Their offense is flat and stagnat most of the time when he is of the floor. I would agree with you that we can win without LeBron but not against top teams like Blazers, Pacers, Spurs, clippers or Thunder.