VaDe255 wrote:[Spoiler:
I’ve been combing NBA depth charts relentlessly and i just don’t see a Tyler Herro trade they makes sense for us or the other team without selling really low. He’s worth more here right now. Maybe swapping out for Vassell and pick? Like you mentioned the team that also trades for him has to really like him with extension looming. Just too many factors working against a deal. We are kinda just stuck with him hoping he continues to get better because he’s too good just to let go for a low ball offer. We can win with Herro under the right build.[/quote]
The only reason I advocate for trading Herro is because I think Miami would be wise to get ahead of what could become an acrimonious standoff with regards to his extension. Miami's FO obv has a much better feel for where things stand with Herro and what they'd be comfortable giving him v what Herro's camp thinks he's worth. Even if Herro doesn't demand the max, I don't see him taking less than $40M/season, and I just don't think he's worth anywhere near that kind of money.
But I agree there just isn't an obvious deal that makes sense.[/quote][/spoiler]
I don’t know why I still keep reading stuff like this. His max is 26% this is not the 30% max or the 35% supermax.
If the top 15–20 guys get the supermax (15 guys make All-NBA every year) and almost all players in the 20–50 range are on a 26–30% max, then it’s completely normal for a guy like Herro who is well within the top 50 and still has upside to get the 26% max.
TLDR:
i) Herro will ask for the max. He’s a 25y old All Star and from his perspective, there’s no reason to ask for less.
ii) The Heat are going to give him the max with no questions
The Heat have no incentive to haggle over 3–6% of the cap with one of their best players, lowballing him would likely damage the relationship and trade value for minimal benefit.
I don’t understand how this is even a debate.
The only way Herro doesn’t sign the max with the Heat is if they are out on him (they’re not), or he declines it to chase the supermax later.[/quote][/quote]
This is the wrong way to look at this.
There is no reason to pay a player 25-30% of the cap when you can get similar production for less. Norman Powell, Devin Vassell, and DeMar DeRozan make significantly less than Herro and are going to give you as good or better production. It's no different than asking why would anyone pay Bradley Beal $50+M/year when they could get similar or better production from Herro, Powell, or DeRozan. That's why there is a "debate". Giving monstrous contracts to non-star players is ALWAYS a no-no.
Kyrie Irving is worlds better than Herro and will be paid $39 and $42M/year in 26-27 and 27-28, respectively. In those same season, Ja Morant will make $42 and $45M. Jalen Brunson will make $37, $40, and $43M in 26-27, 27-28, and 28-29. Herro is not worth more than Kyrie Irving, Ja Morant or Jalen Brunson.
Paying Herro significantly more than there players is a fool's errand and completely unjustifiable unless Herro gets significantly better.