CrossOver wrote:
It’ll be DeRozan.
Moderators: KingDavid, QUIZ, heat4life, MettaWorldPanda, Wiltside, IggieCC, BFRESH44
CrossOver wrote:
Shewasfly wrote:Hallstar wrote:Shewasfly wrote:I don't understand the push to make supporting cast trades (Clarkson, Monk, etc.) now that we've missed out on KD. Those made sense with a #1 option on the team, but doing it now is just losing assets that could be used to compete for a trade for a star next summer.
I've been one of the biggest proponents of a Sexton/John Collins trade but strategically it doesn't make sense anymore. Only way you do it is if you think that's enough of a team to get us a top 5 seed next year. I think the FO has given continuous signals they don't believe in Herro and Bam like that.
I think the idea is if we're not tanking, at least give Herro and Bam something, anything to work with. So we're looking at the same aim, be a 5th seed. Team didn't even have a productive 8 man rotation last year.
Believe me, I want to have a team that isn't **** to look at next year too. So I'd love something that would get them that help and see what they can do (not like we have anything else to look forward to).
But realistically, how can we do that without compromising assets that would give us a shot at REAL talent next summer?
Is Rozier, Duncan, and Wiggins with no picks added enough to get us solid rotation players to fill the gaps? We still need a starting PG (imo, Davion is great backup material but not a starter) and a scoring big off the bench that can sometimes close when we go small with Bam at C.
Assuming Jovic is showcased and moves full time into the starting lineup, we have:
PG/Davion
Herro/Larsson
Jovic/Highsmith
Bam/?
Ware/?
How are we filling those gaps with just giving up trash and not compromising real assets that can be used for 2026?




3ammy3uck3ts wrote:

3ammy3uck3ts wrote:
BBallFreak wrote:3ammy3uck3ts wrote:
They have no assets. They have expiring deals, sure, not he's worth more than Gabe and Rui. Unless they're tossing in Knecht, I don't see it.

3ammy3uck3ts wrote:
3ammy3uck3ts wrote:
