
The numbers in parentheses represent Jordan's highs over the three year period in any of the respective categories. James deserves a lot of blame for 2011, but the nonsense of "2 out of 5" is ridiculous when you look at a player who shot that well, had three quarters in which he had 14+ points and shot near 100% TS, and was a few throwaway chucks right before being pulled in games 3, 4, and 5 from shooting 60%, 56% from three, 73% TS. James led the playoffs in Win Shares, WS/48, PER by a large margin, and ORtg for players who played 25+ min/game 57% FG, 67% TS, 124 ORtg for the playoffs. Not sure what more he could have done.
Obviously, Jordan was older during this three year run, but central point remains: James work will be distilled down to "lost 3 out of 5" when in fact he statistically outplayed another player who is given credit for winning all finals he contested.
James can't be happy with how it all ended, but as another poster posted, this should get this team to reevaluate how it wants to approach things because it can't be about all Lebron all time.