RealGM

Bishop45 wrote:

shanedude wrote:You guys think it would be weird if we shared pics of what we look like? Or is that against the TOS. Would be fun to put faces to our little community.

Try to keep name/face off the intewebbs besides social media for the wimminz/networking and what-have-you , just in case something I called Iggie years prior doesn't comeback for me but I'm cute enough for a private-op as long as Iggs can't save any of my photos for whatever xreepy thing he's making

gom wrote:



"rat poop palace"

http://www.miamiherald.com/sports/spt-columns-blogs/greg-cote/article149256029.html

goodboy wrote:

Bishop45 wrote:

shanedude wrote:You guys think it would be weird if we shared pics of what we look like? Or is that against the TOS. Would be fun to put faces to our little community.

Try to keep name/face off the intewebbs besides social media for the wimminz/networking and what-have-you , just in case something I called Iggie years prior doesn't comeback for me but I'm cute enough for a private-op as long as Iggs can't save any of my photos for whatever xreepy thing he's making

But yeah, Bish is right. I don't mind sharing what I look like, nor anyone of us close-knit fam on this board imo. It all kinda narrows down to voodoo spells of ignatius that may intervene in our personal affairs.

goodboy wrote:The rock running for president would be the coolest thing for Merica'

MettaWorldPanda wrote:

Read on Twitter

Mos_Heat wrote:

MettaWorldPanda wrote:

Read on Twitter

not pron. disappointed

IggieCC wrote:

Mos_Heat wrote:

MettaWorldPanda wrote:

Read on Twitter

not pron. disappointed

MettaWorldPanda wrote:

IggieCC wrote:

Mos_Heat wrote:not pron. disappointed

Bishop45 wrote:

shanedude wrote:You guys think it would be weird if we shared pics of what we look like? Or is that against the TOS. Would be fun to put faces to our little community.

Try to keep name/face off the intewebbs besides social media for the wimminz/networking and what-have-you , just in case something I called Iggie years prior doesn't comeback for me but I'm cute enough for a private-op as long as Iggs can't save any of my photos for whatever xreepy thing he's making

Mos_Heat wrote:

MettaWorldPanda wrote:

Read on Twitter

not pron. disappointed

gom wrote:I know this isn't news, but Jeff Van Gundy is the most annoying, stupidest commentator of the NBA. How do you get a job like that without knowing anything about basketball? He's like a parody version of a sports commentator.

"Whatever happens, I just can't see it being a good idea to give the ball to Steph Curry or Kevin Durant. Any other guy is fine."...

Mars wrote:

gom wrote:I know this isn't news, but Jeff Van Gundy is the most annoying, stupidest commentator of the NBA. How do you get a job like that without knowing anything about basketball? He's like a parody version of a sports commentator.

"Whatever happens, I just can't see it being a good idea to give the ball to Steph Curry or Kevin Durant. Any other guy is fine."...

My immediate interpretation was that Van Gundy was commenting from a Spurs defensive perspective. He was pointing out that, if you're the Spurs, the two Warriors you can't let touch the ball are Steph and Durant, even though Klay's a great shooter as well.

It was particularly the case due to how poorly Klay had been playing up to the point, which Van Gundy had touched on several times throughout the game. Right after he had missed that wide open three, Van Gundy even prefaced it with some form of "Klay's a great player, but...".

...at least that's how I heard it.

KingDavid wrote:Gom getting senile in his old age.