Re: Miami HEAT Offseason/Trades/FA Thread: Sardine Central 5.0
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2017 1:44 am
Klay aint going nowhere, unfortunately. He would be sick - on his own team, he'd dominate.
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=1601867
Seabass777 wrote:Klay Thompson on this team would make us special.
Wiltside wrote:Klay aint going nowhere, unfortunately. He would be sick - on his own team, he'd dominate.
Wiltside wrote:Spoiler:
Put some respect on the name.
Chalm Down wrote:Wiltside wrote:Spoiler:
Put some respect on the name.
Aw i miss birdman
gom wrote:Ok, this is the kind of crap that I've been talking about, and why it's stupid to pursue players when we don't really have a chance to sign them:
http://www.miamiherald.com/sports/spt-columns-blogs/greg-cote/article168959927.html
We didn't swing for the fences and miss twice. We were never in the running for Irving, and Hayward just used us as a counterweight. We got played.
Oh, and FU, Greg Cote. What bull...****.
Flash4thewin wrote:gom wrote:Ok, this is the kind of crap that I've been talking about, and why it's stupid to pursue players when we don't really have a chance to sign them:
http://www.miamiherald.com/sports/spt-columns-blogs/greg-cote/article168959927.html
We didn't swing for the fences and miss twice. We were never in the running for Irving, and Hayward just used us as a counterweight. We got played.
Oh, and FU, Greg Cote. What bull...****.
Why would you even say that Gom? We where in the running but Pat could not close the deals at all. At least we where in the running. Hayward listened to Pat and his offer and say no thank you. Many teams didn’t even get that opportunity. The Irving trade shows the Cavs had no problem trading to a rival as long as they got what they wanted unlike the Pacers. We where in the running but for whatever reason failed to close the deal. The important thing is we where in the running. It’s better to at least get a chance to swing and miss than to never have swung at all.
contract wrote:The Cavs and Celtics are better than we are ... on paper. But someone tell me why we're not the 3rd best team in the East. Someone tell me why we're behind Toronto and Washington. Neither team has superstars. Neither has our depth. Neither has better coaching.
Why aren't we #3?
contract wrote:The Cavs and Celtics are better than we are ... on paper. But someone tell me why we're not the 3rd best team in the East. Someone tell me why we're behind Toronto and Washington. Neither team has superstars. Neither has our depth. Neither has better coaching.
Why aren't we #3?
contract wrote:The Cavs and Celtics are better than we are ... on paper. But someone tell me why we're not the 3rd best team in the East. Someone tell me why we're behind Toronto and Washington. Neither team has superstars. Neither has our depth. Neither has better coaching.
Why aren't we #3?
Flash4thewin wrote:gom wrote:Ok, this is the kind of crap that I've been talking about, and why it's stupid to pursue players when we don't really have a chance to sign them:
http://www.miamiherald.com/sports/spt-columns-blogs/greg-cote/article168959927.html
We didn't swing for the fences and miss twice. We were never in the running for Irving, and Hayward just used us as a counterweight. We got played.
Oh, and FU, Greg Cote. What bull...****.
Why would you even say that Gom? We where in the running but Pat could not close the deals at all. At least we where in the running. Hayward listened to Pat and his offer and say no thank you. Many teams didn’t even get that opportunity. The Irving trade shows the Cavs had no problem trading to a rival as long as they got what they wanted unlike the Pacers. We where in the running but for whatever reason failed to close the deal. The important thing is we where in the running. It’s better to at least get a chance to swing and miss than to never have swung at all.
HeatFanLifer wrote:Wiltside wrote:Klay aint going nowhere, unfortunately. He would be sick - on his own team, he'd dominate.
What's funny is the new CBA was designed to keep all-star players from leaving their team, yet here we are where teams were so afraid of losing their talent that they traded them to preempt their possible departure. The new CBA is also supposed to discourage "super teams", but the dearth of talent and desirability by players to go to contending teams is so bad now that only the top team in the east can trade with the second best team.