Feel_the_Heat15 wrote:twix2500 wrote:Did u see the entire trade? It's Beal Winslow and Drummond oppose to Richardson, Winslow and Bam. Which has more potential to being a true core to build around?Feel_the_Heat15 wrote:
So if Drummond's on this roster we're instant championship contenders? Drummond doesn't even have a higher FG% than Bam. Bam might become the next Siakam or Capela and he's on a great contract.
I'm a fan of Bam and hopefully he becomes better than Capela or Siakam. But Capela and Siakam is not worth 5 yrs to wait for. The only reason Capela and Siakam is impactful is because of Harden, Paul, Leonard and
Lowry. If Winslow grows to an All-star and Beal continues being an All-Sar as he is playing now, Drummond would be impactful just as much as Siakam, and Capela.
Sent from my SM-T550 using Tapatalk
You can't just go from being a subpar team to an elite team in 3 years. For how long have teams like the Timberwolves and Magic been bad? Beal isn't worth trading Richardson AND Bam for. We're talking about giving up a big man that actually fits in today's NBA for a big man you can't play at the end of games. And again, Drummond is awful offensively. Bam actually has a good chance of becoming a stretch-5.
I dont agree with you at all, Heat won all their titles in 3 yrs and less. Became a title contender in Wades second year. You try to get a core as fast you can. Ok if you dont think Beal is elite than I understand. My interest in Bam is not for him to be just a role player. I want him to be elite, which means he is a player that makes team adjust to him. We are worrying too hard on building role players that fits todays game. If we take that route all we gonna be is a average team trying to make a bunch of role players win.
Look at Giannis, he is an elite player, not because he plays a traditional role for todays game. Its because he plays an untraditional role. He a player that teams cant match up against because he is unique. He forces the league to adjust, not him adjusting to the league.