Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
Moderators: KingDavid, IggieCC, QUIZ, BFRESH44, heat4life, MettaWorldPanda, Wiltside
Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,927
- And1: 6,581
- Joined: Nov 12, 2015
Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
Im mad at spo again. You want to know why I am mad at him?
Our team has been getting smoked since 30-11 or whatever it was pretty consistently and I think it is SILLY for lack of a better term for him to not have recognized that he hasnt won since having a spacer on the court since the show Luke Babitt put on in 201whatever.
Even after getting Babbitt back, he didn't play him. What's the deal?
I love Spo tho. Why does he want to stick around when he could join better rosters yearly. He does his thing and he is good but cmon man right there in your faceeeeeee haha
Our team has been getting smoked since 30-11 or whatever it was pretty consistently and I think it is SILLY for lack of a better term for him to not have recognized that he hasnt won since having a spacer on the court since the show Luke Babitt put on in 201whatever.
Even after getting Babbitt back, he didn't play him. What's the deal?
I love Spo tho. Why does he want to stick around when he could join better rosters yearly. He does his thing and he is good but cmon man right there in your faceeeeeee haha
Re: Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
- goodboy
- RealGM
- Posts: 46,493
- And1: 185,289
- Joined: Aug 07, 2014
- Location: disposal japanese worker
Re: Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,927
- And1: 6,581
- Joined: Nov 12, 2015
Re: Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
Spo. Please, have mercy on us.
No Whiteside situationals. Lost rebounds to Pistons.
Wade for 3 to end game? How?
Please, Spo.... why u do this?
No Whiteside situationals. Lost rebounds to Pistons.
Wade for 3 to end game? How?
Please, Spo.... why u do this?
Re: Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
- HeatFanLifer
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,836
- And1: 39,855
- Joined: Oct 20, 2016
Re: Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
ElDoggo wrote:Im mad at spo again. You want to know why I am mad at him?
Our team has been getting smoked since 30-11 or whatever it was pretty consistently and I think it is SILLY for lack of a better term for him to not have recognized that he hasnt won since having a spacer on the court since the show Luke Babitt put on in 201whatever.
Even after getting Babbitt back, he didn't play him. What's the deal?
I love Spo tho. Why does he want to stick around when he could join better rosters yearly. He does his thing and he is good but cmon man right there in your faceeeeeee haha
I agree.
OP for NBA FT record
Re: Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
- HeatFanLifer
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,836
- And1: 39,855
- Joined: Oct 20, 2016
Re: Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
HeatWillRise wrote:lucas pls
Leave him alone.
OP for NBA FT record
Re: Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,927
- And1: 6,581
- Joined: Nov 12, 2015
Re: Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
HeatFanLifer wrote:HeatWillRise wrote:lucas pls
Leave him alone.
haha. dont worry, it was an inside joke. he knows he's nuts haha
Re: Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
- Hallstar
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,353
- And1: 6,788
- Joined: Jul 15, 2008
Re: Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
The team is what it is, just like last year, just like next year. 30-11 is one of the worst things to ever happen to this franchise. Now they're trying to unload guys they should have never signed.
Re: Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
- Kobewade11
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,520
- And1: 15,658
- Joined: Oct 15, 2017
Re: Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
The 30-11 take is overrated. The team was never going to be bad enough to maintain a top 3 pick losing pace over 82 games. They played above themselves the second half of the season sure, but even with a more modest 20-20 finish the only difference is we’d end up in the Ntilikina or DSJ range in place of Bam, and still retain one of Dion/JJ over the summer. Nothing would have been drastically different, but it makes us feel better to put on the hindsight goggles and speculate otherwise.
Re: Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
- Hallstar
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,353
- And1: 6,788
- Joined: Jul 15, 2008
Re: Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
kobewade11 wrote:The 30-11 take is overrated. The team was never going to be bad enough to maintain a top 3 pick losing pace over 82 games. They played above themselves the second half of the season sure, but even with a more modest 20-20 finish the only difference is we’d end up in the Ntilikina or DSJ range in place of Bam, and still retain one of Dion/JJ over the summer. Nothing would have been drastically different, but it makes us feel better to put on the hindsight goggles and speculate otherwise.
Who was drafted one spot before Bam? I didn't like the fake run at the time and said it. Not everything is hindsight, you can hate it while it's happening. If I say we're wasting time and will be a .500 team again next year that's not hindsight.
Re: Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
- Kobewade11
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,520
- And1: 15,658
- Joined: Oct 15, 2017
Re: Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
Hallstar wrote:kobewade11 wrote:The 30-11 take is overrated. The team was never going to be bad enough to maintain a top 3 pick losing pace over 82 games. They played above themselves the second half of the season sure, but even with a more modest 20-20 finish the only difference is we’d end up in the Ntilikina or DSJ range in place of Bam, and still retain one of Dion/JJ over the summer. Nothing would have been drastically different, but it makes us feel better to put on the hindsight goggles and speculate otherwise.
Who was drafted one spot before Bam? I didn't like the fake run at the time and said it. Not everything is hindsight, you can hate it while it's happening. If I say we're wasting time and will be a .500 team again next year that's not hindsight.
It has been said repeatedly from sources in the draft room that Mitchell was never the target even if he was on the board. Those are the hindsight googles again, thinking we automatically would have taken player x just because he’s there even though we have information that says otherwise.
Re: Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
- Flash4thewin
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,329
- And1: 8,027
- Joined: Jan 27, 2006
Re: Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
kobewade11 wrote:Hallstar wrote:kobewade11 wrote:The 30-11 take is overrated. The team was never going to be bad enough to maintain a top 3 pick losing pace over 82 games. They played above themselves the second half of the season sure, but even with a more modest 20-20 finish the only difference is we’d end up in the Ntilikina or DSJ range in place of Bam, and still retain one of Dion/JJ over the summer. Nothing would have been drastically different, but it makes us feel better to put on the hindsight goggles and speculate otherwise.
Who was drafted one spot before Bam? I didn't like the fake run at the time and said it. Not everything is hindsight, you can hate it while it's happening. If I say we're wasting time and will be a .500 team again next year that's not hindsight.
It has been said repeatedly from sources in the draft room that Mitchell was never the target even if he was on the board. Those are the hindsight googles again, thinking we automatically would have taken player x just because he’s there even though we have information that says otherwise.
Would it be safe to say we need to invest more time and resources into scouting when it comes to the draft. We do good at undrafted players but we are subpar when it comes to the draft.
Re: Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
- RexBoyWonder
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,031
- And1: 33,431
- Joined: Mar 03, 2011
Re: Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
Flash4thewin wrote:kobewade11 wrote:Hallstar wrote:Who was drafted one spot before Bam? I didn't like the fake run at the time and said it. Not everything is hindsight, you can hate it while it's happening. If I say we're wasting time and will be a .500 team again next year that's not hindsight.
It has been said repeatedly from sources in the draft room that Mitchell was never the target even if he was on the board. Those are the hindsight googles again, thinking we automatically would have taken player x just because he’s there even though we have information that says otherwise.
Would it be safe to say we need to invest more time and resources into scouting when it comes to the draft. We do good at undrafted players but we are subpar when it comes to the draft.
It's not even that, when we pick at # 10 (Winslow) or #14 (Bam) - you're pretty much limited to guys that alot of teams passed on.
There are real legit reasons why all those teams didn't take them. It's rare that a real star is found in those ranges (late or outside the lottery).
Chalm Downs wrote:his nickname is boywonder ffs
Re: Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
- Kobewade11
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,520
- And1: 15,658
- Joined: Oct 15, 2017
Re: Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
RexBoyWonder wrote:Flash4thewin wrote:
Would it be safe to say we need to invest more time and resources into scouting when it comes to the draft. We do good at undrafted players but we are subpar when it comes to the draft.
It's not even that, when we pick at # 10 (Winslow) or #14 (Bam) - you're pretty much limited to guys that alot of teams passed on.
There are real legit reasons why all those teams didn't take them. It's rare that a real star is found in those ranges (late or outside the lottery).
I don't think we've been bad at the draft. Teams like Orlando and Denver probably would've preferred Winslow as opposed to Mudiay or Hezonja knowing what they know now, I'd say in both drafts we got appropriate value for the draft position..moreso in 2015, a little less in 2017.
Re: Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,930
- And1: 24,963
- Joined: Nov 07, 2014
Re: Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
coach is garbage,doesnt inspire anyone
Re: Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,927
- And1: 6,581
- Joined: Nov 12, 2015
Re: Spo suxx- spo is spock is spork
Does Spo want to be Jerry Sloan or Phil Jackson? He already has rings.