unowen85 wrote:Riley’s career is on life support right now. Teams know he’s desperate to make a move. He’s got no hand.
On life support? He just acquired a top 15 player in the league while having no cap space
Moderators: KingDavid, IggieCC, QUIZ, BFRESH44, heat4life, MettaWorldPanda, Wiltside
unowen85 wrote:Riley’s career is on life support right now. Teams know he’s desperate to make a move. He’s got no hand.
Pat Riley wrote:There are only two options regarding commitment. You're either IN or you're OUT. There is no such thing as life in-between.
James Johnson wrote:The culture is REAL.
Heat3 wrote:CP3 isn’t giving up his money and he won’t be stuck in OKC. He’ll be just as movable as Whiteside was in his final year to some team that wants to get out of long term contracts.
unowen85 wrote:Riley’s career is on life support right now. Teams know he’s desperate to make a move. He’s got no hand.
twix2500 wrote:Kevin Love the same age as Russ and Butler lolHeatingUp3 wrote:Omg. CP and Kevin Love? Whats the deal with us interesting in those old big contract dudes??? Just wait! Every deadline a star player wants out or something. Look PP and Russ traded within a week. Just wait. The right deal will pop
Sent from my SM-T550 using Tapatalk
dean456 wrote:Heat3 wrote:CP3 isn’t giving up his money and he won’t be stuck in OKC. He’ll be just as movable as Whiteside was in his final year to some team that wants to get out of long term contracts.
Are you saying he will be tradable when he's an expiring contract or that he is as tradable as Whiteside's expiring deal this off season? Because the first means he will be stuck in OKC the next two season's and the second just isn't true. We found it hard enough to trade Whiteside's 27mil expiring contract, trading one year of 27mil for a 30yo is much different to 120+mil over 3 years of a 34yo player regardless of who it is.
Pat Riley wrote:There are only two options regarding commitment. You're either IN or you're OUT. There is no such thing as life in-between.
James Johnson wrote:The culture is REAL.
DayofMourning wrote:I was interested in seeing the increase in wins Paul generated for each team he joined.
The season before he joined the OKC Hornets they won 18 games. His first year with the team they won 38 games. That's a two fold increase in wins! In his 3rd year they won 56 games. That's their franchise record for a single season.
The season before he joined the Clippers they won 32 games. His first year they won 40 (in 66 games). That's a 50% increase in winning percentage! The next three seasons they won 56-57 games. Those are the most wins ever in the franchise's history for single seasons.
The season before he joined the Rockets they won 55 games. His first year they won 65 games. An increase of ~20%! No Rockets club has ever won more games in a year.
So, as much of a cancer and overpaid, over the hill player he is, he has always been a winner. Something that can't be said for a lot of superstars out there.
Bishop45 wrote:DayofMourning wrote:I was interested in seeing the increase in wins Paul generated for each team he joined.
The season before he joined the OKC Hornets they won 18 games. His first year with the team they won 38 games. That's a two fold increase in wins! In his 3rd year they won 56 games. That's their franchise record for a single season.
The season before he joined the Clippers they won 32 games. His first year they won 40 (in 66 games). That's a 50% increase in winning percentage! The next three seasons they won 56-57 games. Those are the most wins ever in the franchise's history for single seasons.
The season before he joined the Rockets they won 55 games. His first year they won 65 games. An increase of ~20%! No Rockets club has ever won more games in a year.
So, as much of a cancer and overpaid, over the hill player he is, he has always been a winner. Something that can't be said for a lot of superstars out there.
This is fair too, besides him being old, negative media coverage is the main reason he's seen as a lesser player than guys like Russ.
But understandable, Paul seems like an annoying personality most of the time
DayofMourning wrote:I was interested in seeing the increase in wins Paul generated for each team he joined.
The season before he joined the OKC Hornets they won 18 games. His first year with the team they won 38 games. That's a two fold increase in wins! In his 3rd year they won 56 games. That's their franchise record for a single season.
The season before he joined the Clippers they won 32 games. His first year they won 40 (in 66 games). That's a 50% increase in winning percentage! The next three seasons they won 56-57 games. Those are the most wins ever in the franchise's history for single seasons.
The season before he joined the Rockets they won 55 games. His first year they won 65 games. An increase of ~20%! No Rockets club has ever won more games in a year.
So, as much of a cancer and overpaid, over the hill player he is, he has always been a winner. Something that can't be said for a lot of superstars out there.
DayofMourning wrote:Bishop45 wrote:DayofMourning wrote:I was interested in seeing the increase in wins Paul generated for each team he joined.
The season before he joined the OKC Hornets they won 18 games. His first year with the team they won 38 games. That's a two fold increase in wins! In his 3rd year they won 56 games. That's their franchise record for a single season.
The season before he joined the Clippers they won 32 games. His first year they won 40 (in 66 games). That's a 50% increase in winning percentage! The next three seasons they won 56-57 games. Those are the most wins ever in the franchise's history for single seasons.
The season before he joined the Rockets they won 55 games. His first year they won 65 games. An increase of ~20%! No Rockets club has ever won more games in a year.
So, as much of a cancer and overpaid, over the hill player he is, he has always been a winner. Something that can't be said for a lot of superstars out there.
This is fair too, besides him being old, negative media coverage is the main reason he's seen as a lesser player than guys like Russ.
But understandable, Paul seems like an annoying personality most of the time
I could realistically see him playing better through the end of his contract than Russ.
Russ is the exciting, run through a brick wall with all the athleticism that has wowed people for years. CP is not that at all, and has flopped his way into the bad graces of many a fan. However, I thought it fitting to focus on what he is exceptional at, and that's winning. His stats stand with anybody's, but he's overlooked because despite the wins he's generated, he's never been on a great team. When he finally teamed up with another star (Harden), he got injured and lost his chance at the Finals.
So for me, I'd hitch my wagon to CP3 if I wanted to win. He may get injured and his game might regress some, but he's the greatest point of his generation, and an all time winner based on any metric.
Heat3 wrote:dean456 wrote:Heat3 wrote:CP3 isn’t giving up his money and he won’t be stuck in OKC. He’ll be just as movable as Whiteside was in his final year to some team that wants to get out of long term contracts.
Are you saying he will be tradable when he's an expiring contract or that he is as tradable as Whiteside's expiring deal this off season? Because the first means he will be stuck in OKC the next two season's and the second just isn't true. We found it hard enough to trade Whiteside's 27mil expiring contract, trading one year of 27mil for a 30yo is much different to 120+mil over 3 years of a 34yo player regardless of who it is.
Well he won't be stuck for 3 years is what I meant There will be plenty of teams in 2 years, that have bad long term contracts either signed this year or next off season that they regret. They'll be happy to get out if them if it meant biting the bullet on CP3 for one season then having cap space after. It's still possible he gets moved this off season if OKC gives up picks.
MartyConlonJr wrote:This is all well and good but obviously a flawed argument, as it wasn't 34 year old Chris doing any of this. The Knicks and Nuggets had most of their best seasons this century with Melo and I don't want him either.
That being said Houston was 39-19 In the games Paul played last season (.672) and 14-10 without (.583). So he clearly still helps winning even with the decline. Their record when he plays was 4th in the league (behind GSW, TOR, MIL) and 13th when he doesn't.
I think there is like a 20% chance Chris Paul has a slow decline like a Steve Nash or Jason Kidd where they are so cerebral that they are a positive contributor into late 30's but EVEN if it is true, it is just too much cap.
More likely is that he can't stay healthy, as has probably been the story of his career in most seasons where his body didn't hold up come playoffs.
Despite having a winning disposition and game, he is falling off, too expensive (having wide reaching implications to our team structure going forward) and too injury prone.
DayofMourning wrote:Bishop45 wrote:DayofMourning wrote:I was interested in seeing the increase in wins Paul generated for each team he joined.
The season before he joined the OKC Hornets they won 18 games. His first year with the team they won 38 games. That's a two fold increase in wins! In his 3rd year they won 56 games. That's their franchise record for a single season.
The season before he joined the Clippers they won 32 games. His first year they won 40 (in 66 games). That's a 50% increase in winning percentage! The next three seasons they won 56-57 games. Those are the most wins ever in the franchise's history for single seasons.
The season before he joined the Rockets they won 55 games. His first year they won 65 games. An increase of ~20%! No Rockets club has ever won more games in a year.
So, as much of a cancer and overpaid, over the hill player he is, he has always been a winner. Something that can't be said for a lot of superstars out there.
This is fair too, besides him being old, negative media coverage is the main reason he's seen as a lesser player than guys like Russ.
But understandable, Paul seems like an annoying personality most of the time
I could realistically see him playing better through the end of his contract than Russ.
Russ is the exciting, run through a brick wall with all the athleticism that has wowed people for years. CP is not that at all, and has flopped his way into the bad graces of many a fan. However, I thought it fitting to focus on what he is exceptional at, and that's winning. His stats stand with anybody's, but he's overlooked because despite the wins he's generated, he's never been on a great team. When he finally teamed up with another star (Harden), he got injured and lost his chance at the Finals.
So for me, I'd hitch my wagon to CP3 if I wanted to win. He may get injured and his game might regress some, but he's the greatest point of his generation, and an all time winner based on any metric.
Bishop45 wrote:At minimal cost I'm in. Scared, but in
puppa bear wrote:CPs game will age better than Russ’ and his decline will be a gradual slope rather than a steep drop off. That deal is still horrendous, too-5 worst deals in the league at this point for me. If they want to move him without giving up assets then they best be taking on crap deals and giving us some breathing space against the hard cap. For them I feel moving an unimpressed CP and getting under the cap should be enough of a win to give up our picks. Then the Westbrook deal becomes Brodie for getting under the tax/clearing years at the back end/unprotecting one of the future picks/swapping teams & years of 2 of the future picks/2 swaps. That’s actually a win when it’s put that way, and possibly a bigger win than the package they got, but the optics of trading away two picks is what will likely stop it happening.
CP with Bam to throw assists to would be nice, and as much as he’s being trashed here a CP-Love PnP would offer a great contrast to the CP-Bam PnR. Jimmy would still be he clear number one, and the closer. Depth could become and issue, but I would expect that the deals would be structured to get us breathing space to sign enough minimum deals to get through.
If we got out of this offseason with our 2021 pick back, Jimmy, CP, Love, Whiteside gone and all it cost was J-Rich & Winslow then I think we’d all be happy at that end result! Jimmy/CP/Love/Bam/Herro/KZ/Nunn and all our future picks in tact, is a pretty decent starting point for a four year window of contention.