Since the other thread was close in the middle of the night.
3ballbomber wrote:AirP. wrote:So let me get this right... Miami starts an undersized center against a team who has 2 bigs bigger and as strong or stronger than him? I hope Spoelstra just decided to try going small just one game to see if it would work. Both Olynyk and Leonard can space the floor and hit 3s at a solid rate... I just don't understand giving up that much size to LA, it's suicidal.
3ballbomber wrote:
It's amazing when a team achieves such massive success knocking out a more talented #1 & 3 squads, making great adjustments, fantastic rotational decisions & playing w/ so much attention to detail to advance to the NBA finals nobody has anything negative to say. But after 1 loss the criticism comes in. No Dragic, No Bam & a hobbled Butler so unable for opportunity to go on our customary comeback. But in spite of those absences were still able to make it a 12pt game near the end. And spite of our starting line up we were able to go up early by 13pts. We didn't have problems w/ their height they couldn't miss a damn 3 pointer - a team that is 21st in the bubble in 3s are making it raining. That's an anomaly that i guarantee will not happen again. If anything it was our lack of aggression guarding the 3pt line more than any issues w/ Height. At that point it was majority jump shots from LA.
First of all, Miami had the right personnel to knock out the Bucks since they had the players to slow down Giannis and build a wall so he couldn't just attack the basket(since he's a limited shooter from the outside), also B.Lopez was used a ton as a 3pt spacer, not sitting down in the low block(which he was very effective at when he went there). Boston's weak point on their roster has been their center position while also playing smaller players at PF, so Miami was fine with playing an undersized center(although very good) and going small, it did not hurt them. The Lakers are completely different animal with their size and the QUALITY of that size. AD who is playing a lot of PF is bigger than Bam, then they usually have a good rebounding center on the court with him who easily got rebounds. MIAMI WAS OUT REBOUNDED 36 to 54. I'm hoping that Spoelstra decided to try small ball for just the first game to see how it would work, it really didn't when going against 2 bigs who are bigger and probably stronger than Bam.
All I'm advocating is going back to Bam at PF and Leonard/Olynyk at C ONLY WHEN LA has 2 bigs on the court, if they go small Bam and some Olynyk/Leonard is fine at center. LA is different because AD is a superstar big who can hit from the outside.
As good as Bam is, at this point in time AD is better and LA can neutralize Bam, something Boston couldn't do, hence the breakout series. If Bam is neutralized to an extent and Dragic really shouldn't be playing, the scoring has to come mostly from Butler, Robinson, Herro and now Nunn who are capable of putting up 20 if not 30 point games but 3 of those guys are very inexperienced and are going to have to try to do it in THE FINALS. I believe Herro and Nunn should be fine, Robinson and his confidence(lack of) really could be the problem, he scored 0 points in 27 minutes in game 1.
On LAs 3pt shooting, outside of LeBron and AD(who went 4-8 from 3pt range), the rest of the team went 11-30 from 3pt range which is just under 37% and so far in the playoffs Morris is hitting 45%, KCP is hitting 41%, Rondo 41%, Green 36% LeBron 36%, AD 38%, Kuzman 31%, LA was hot early on(11-17 3pt 1st half) but cooled off(4-21 from 3pt range in the 2nd half) and still it wasn't a close game. Hopefully the jitters effected Miami's younger players way worse than LA's vets and with that, much better games from this point on.