Who are the Bulls going to take with the number one
Moderators: KingDavid, BFRESH44, MettaWorldPanda, Wiltside, heat4life, QUIZ, IggieCC
Who are the Bulls going to take with the number one
- CoolD
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,880
- And1: 973
- Joined: Mar 26, 2007
-
Who are the Bulls going to take with the number one
Who should the Bulls take, they have a small team. But who do you think they will go with. Beasley or Rose.
2 is not bad, but I wanted to have the option to pick the first one.
But not as bad as it could of been.
2 is not bad, but I wanted to have the option to pick the first one.
But not as bad as it could of been.
- SHO'NUFF
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,084
- And1: 2,215
- Joined: Jun 20, 2004
- Location: ★ ★ ★ ★
- Contact:
-
-
ItsAJyaKnow
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,317
- And1: 10
- Joined: Nov 04, 2004
- Location: PHX
- Contact:
-
-
The Diesel
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,711
- And1: 0
- Joined: Aug 07, 2005
No way is Chicago taking Beasley over Rose considering the character concerns surrounding Beasley and the fact that Rose has a reputation for being a great leader and high-character guy.
Paxson really emphasizes "high character" when it comes to acquiring players.
I can't see him taking the risk of passing on Rose.
Paxson really emphasizes "high character" when it comes to acquiring players.
I can't see him taking the risk of passing on Rose.
-
kundanp333
- Freshman
- Posts: 53
- And1: 6
- Joined: May 18, 2008
IndoorOutdoor wrote:Beasley fits perfectly into their core right now: Hinrich, Gordon, Deng, Beasley, Noah
That team scares me a lot more then: Rose, Gordon, Deng, Thomas/Gooden, Noah
Couldn't agree more... i like duhon too... thomas is refusing to expand his brain, so i think they surely will take beasley.
- CoolD
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,880
- And1: 973
- Joined: Mar 26, 2007
-
But he got rid of Scott Skiles, maybe the guy has changed his views. I hope so.The Diesel wrote:No way is Chicago taking Beasley over Rose considering the character concerns surrounding Beasley and the fact that Rose has a reputation for being a great leader and high-character guy.
Paxson really emphasizes "high character" when it comes to acquiring players.
I can't see him taking the risk of passing on Rose.
But if they would of gotten D'Antoni as the coach, that would of guaranteed Rose going to the Bulls.
-
HeatFanSince87
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,966
- And1: 758
- Joined: Mar 13, 2002
- Location: Miami
I agree, they have been desperate for a post presence for years now, and Beasly brings that, and they have Kirk and Duhon. Why take another pg then pay Kirk starter money, and be at an all-time low trade value? I would be happy with either to be honest, both will be stars. The lottery is so dumb man. The Bulls, with 1.9 % chance get the top pick..it makes no sense man. If they take Rose, we get Beasley, and will unload Marion as a free agent in the summer(or trade for an impact player right away), and be a player in the free agent pool in 2009.
- MartyConlonJr
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,949
- And1: 3,226
- Joined: Jul 19, 2003
-
You know Hinrich is
1. Wade's age
2. Great defender
3. Very good 3 point shooter
4. Doesn't need the ball in his hands
5. A good (not great) floor general
He's really a very good PG to team with Wade. If Chicago takes Rose, we should offer Haslem for Hinrich, or Marion and filler.
C - Noah / Gooden
PF - Marion or Haslem / Thomas
SF - Deng / Nocioni
SG - Hughes / Gordon
PG - Rose / Duhon
1. Wade's age
2. Great defender
3. Very good 3 point shooter
4. Doesn't need the ball in his hands
5. A good (not great) floor general
He's really a very good PG to team with Wade. If Chicago takes Rose, we should offer Haslem for Hinrich, or Marion and filler.
C - Noah / Gooden
PF - Marion or Haslem / Thomas
SF - Deng / Nocioni
SG - Hughes / Gordon
PG - Rose / Duhon
- Wade2k6
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,104
- And1: 77
- Joined: May 29, 2004
-
MartyConlonJr wrote:You know Hinrich is
1. Wade's age
2. Great defender
3. Very good 3 point shooter
4. Doesn't need the ball in his hands
5. A good (not great) floor general
He's really a very good PG to team with Wade. If Chicago takes Rose, we should offer Haslem for Hinrich, or Marion and filler.
C - Noah / Gooden
PF - Marion or Haslem / Thomas
SF - Deng / Nocioni
SG - Hughes / Gordon
PG - Rose / Duhon
So we would trade Marion for Hinrich and the Bulls don't give up either of Nocioni, Thomas, Gooden, Noah etc.? That's a terrible trade for the Heat.
-
unowen85
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 7,579
- And1: 2,905
- Joined: Jul 01, 2003
- Location: Maryland
-
Hinrich
Hughes
Deng
Noah
Lopez
Dyansty
Do it Bulls
Hughes
Deng
Noah
Lopez
Dyansty
Do it Bulls
For a long time it gave me nightmares,witnessing an injustice like that.It’s a constant reminder of just how unfair this world can be.I can still hear them taunting him, Silly Rabbit tricks are for kids.I mean why couldn’t they just give him some cereal?
-
BBallFreak
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 57,533
- And1: 18,785
- Joined: Jun 23, 2001
-
Couple of things to remember regarding Chicago:
1) Both Gordon and Duhon are free agents, though Gordon is restricted, Duhon had problems with their coaching staff.
2) Hinrich has played off guard before, and done so on a full time basis.
3) They do have both Drew Gooden and Tyrus Thomas at power forward, and Tyrus was a very high pick. They may want to go for the guard, knowing their frontcourt is adequate, while their backcourt is suspect. After all, this is a guard driven league these days.
Either way though, we cannot lose IMO. Their is no bad choice for us. If we get Beasley, we can deal Marion for whatever the hell we want or extend him, because Beasley is our interior guy, leaving the need for cap space as a non-issue IMO. Why go after Brand or Boozer when we already have Beasley? If we get Rose, we run like hell with he and Wade in the backcourt, and Marion and Haslem up front. That's huge for us. We really have no wrong answer to this...
1) Both Gordon and Duhon are free agents, though Gordon is restricted, Duhon had problems with their coaching staff.
2) Hinrich has played off guard before, and done so on a full time basis.
3) They do have both Drew Gooden and Tyrus Thomas at power forward, and Tyrus was a very high pick. They may want to go for the guard, knowing their frontcourt is adequate, while their backcourt is suspect. After all, this is a guard driven league these days.
Either way though, we cannot lose IMO. Their is no bad choice for us. If we get Beasley, we can deal Marion for whatever the hell we want or extend him, because Beasley is our interior guy, leaving the need for cap space as a non-issue IMO. Why go after Brand or Boozer when we already have Beasley? If we get Rose, we run like hell with he and Wade in the backcourt, and Marion and Haslem up front. That's huge for us. We really have no wrong answer to this...
- CB4MiamiHeat
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,694
- And1: 2
- Joined: Jun 13, 2004
im so happy at 2..its a win win
I hear people wanting to pass up on Beasley cause of Marion..or trade Marion if we get Beasley...why? Theyre nothing alike, they complement each other well..one plays with the ball, the other moves well without the ball.
With Marion and Beasley at the forward spots well have the best rebounding forward tandem..to the point where we can get away with playing Blount at Center.
I hear people wanting to pass up on Beasley cause of Marion..or trade Marion if we get Beasley...why? Theyre nothing alike, they complement each other well..one plays with the ball, the other moves well without the ball.
With Marion and Beasley at the forward spots well have the best rebounding forward tandem..to the point where we can get away with playing Blount at Center.











