Page 1 of 9
Who are the Bulls going to take with the number one
Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 12:28 am
by CoolD
Who should the Bulls take, they have a small team. But who do you think they will go with. Beasley or Rose.
2 is not bad, but I wanted to have the option to pick the first one.
But not as bad as it could of been.
Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 12:30 am
by G.cracker
Even though Rose is from Chicago, they have been desperate for a post presence. Can't see them not taking Beasley.
Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 12:31 am
by Miami's Finest
I'm just happy to finish top 2, 3 was a huge dropoff. But Chicago I think takes Rose, he's from the area and the best player in the draft
Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 12:35 am
by kundanp333
i think chicago will take beastly... so we may just end up with rose... i dont mind beastly either... well just have to sign a good pg then... JOSEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE come to the HEAT.
Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 12:35 am
by SHO'NUFF
I think we get Rose.
Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 12:37 am
by Iputsomepantson
The Bulls would be dumb not to take Beasley. They would have to trade Hinrich, who has a considerably low trade value right now and would have an even lower trade value with the Bulls desperate to move him and would still have a huge hole in the post.
Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 12:38 am
by ItsAJyaKnow
I think the Bulls have to take Beasley.. They have too many perimeter players.
Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 12:42 am
by The Diesel
No way is Chicago taking Beasley over Rose considering the character concerns surrounding Beasley and the fact that Rose has a reputation for being a great leader and high-character guy.
Paxson really emphasizes "high character" when it comes to acquiring players.
I can't see him taking the risk of passing on Rose.
Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 12:42 am
by IndoorOutdoor
Beasley fits perfectly into their core right now: Hinrich, Gordon, Deng, Beasley, Noah
That team scares me a lot more then: Rose, Gordon, Deng, Thomas/Gooden, Noah
Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 12:46 am
by kundanp333
IndoorOutdoor wrote:Beasley fits perfectly into their core right now: Hinrich, Gordon, Deng, Beasley, Noah
That team scares me a lot more then: Rose, Gordon, Deng, Thomas/Gooden, Noah
Couldn't agree more... i like duhon too... thomas is refusing to expand his brain, so i think they surely will take beasley.
Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 12:48 am
by el loco
Miami's Finest wrote:I'm just happy to finish top 2, 3 was a huge dropoff. But Chicago I think takes Rose, he's from the area and the best player in the draft

Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 12:50 am
by CoolD
The Diesel wrote:No way is Chicago taking Beasley over Rose considering the character concerns surrounding Beasley and the fact that Rose has a reputation for being a great leader and high-character guy.
Paxson really emphasizes "high character" when it comes to acquiring players.
I can't see him taking the risk of passing on Rose.
But he got rid of Scott Skiles, maybe the guy has changed his views. I hope so.
But if they would of gotten D'Antoni as the coach, that would of guaranteed Rose going to the Bulls.
Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 12:52 am
by HeatFanSince87
I agree, they have been desperate for a post presence for years now, and Beasly brings that, and they have Kirk and Duhon. Why take another pg then pay Kirk starter money, and be at an all-time low trade value? I would be happy with either to be honest, both will be stars. The lottery is so dumb man. The Bulls, with 1.9 % chance get the top pick..it makes no sense man. If they take Rose, we get Beasley, and will unload Marion as a free agent in the summer(or trade for an impact player right away), and be a player in the free agent pool in 2009.
Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 12:54 am
by HitMan52
The league is turning into a PG league and Rose is there for the taking so the Bulls better take him.
Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 12:56 am
by MartyConlonJr
You know Hinrich is
1. Wade's age
2. Great defender
3. Very good 3 point shooter
4. Doesn't need the ball in his hands
5. A good (not great) floor general
He's really a very good PG to team with Wade. If Chicago takes Rose, we should offer Haslem for Hinrich, or Marion and filler.
C - Noah / Gooden
PF - Marion or Haslem / Thomas
SF - Deng / Nocioni
SG - Hughes / Gordon
PG - Rose / Duhon
Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 12:58 am
by Wade2k6
MartyConlonJr wrote:You know Hinrich is
1. Wade's age
2. Great defender
3. Very good 3 point shooter
4. Doesn't need the ball in his hands
5. A good (not great) floor general
He's really a very good PG to team with Wade. If Chicago takes Rose, we should offer Haslem for Hinrich, or Marion and filler.
C - Noah / Gooden
PF - Marion or Haslem / Thomas
SF - Deng / Nocioni
SG - Hughes / Gordon
PG - Rose / Duhon
So we would trade Marion for Hinrich and the Bulls don't give up either of Nocioni, Thomas, Gooden, Noah etc.? That's a terrible trade for the Heat.
Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 12:58 am
by unowen85
Hinrich
Hughes
Deng
Noah
Lopez
Dyansty
Do it Bulls
Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 1:00 am
by BBallFreak
Couple of things to remember regarding Chicago:
1) Both Gordon and Duhon are free agents, though Gordon is restricted, Duhon had problems with their coaching staff.
2) Hinrich has played off guard before, and done so on a full time basis.
3) They do have both Drew Gooden and Tyrus Thomas at power forward, and Tyrus was a very high pick. They may want to go for the guard, knowing their frontcourt is adequate, while their backcourt is suspect. After all, this is a guard driven league these days.
Either way though, we cannot lose IMO. Their is no bad choice for us. If we get Beasley, we can deal Marion for whatever the hell we want or extend him, because Beasley is our interior guy, leaving the need for cap space as a non-issue IMO. Why go after Brand or Boozer when we already have Beasley? If we get Rose, we run like hell with he and Wade in the backcourt, and Marion and Haslem up front. That's huge for us. We really have no wrong answer to this...
Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 1:06 am
by CB4MiamiHeat
im so happy at 2..its a win win
I hear people wanting to pass up on Beasley cause of Marion..or trade Marion if we get Beasley...why? Theyre nothing alike, they complement each other well..one plays with the ball, the other moves well without the ball.
With Marion and Beasley at the forward spots well have the best rebounding forward tandem..to the point where we can get away with playing Blount at Center.
Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 1:10 am
by DanDanE420
Great post, CB4.
There are two things Marion can't do: create facing the basket and score in the post. Beasley does both of these things exceptionally well. Wade and a new PG (TJ Ford?) would have three forwards that play hard, catch the ball and finish.