Prez wrote:Since the 2-8 start we’re tied with Minnesota for 6th in DRTG. 48 game sample size, with room to improve if Doc started Green instead of Prince.
So, since Doc started playing the yutes.
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
Prez wrote:Since the 2-8 start we’re tied with Minnesota for 6th in DRTG. 48 game sample size, with room to improve if Doc started Green instead of Prince.
BigO wrote:The two big problems going forward:
1) Creating offense. With KM, we had an elite shot maker and faciltator. Take that away and replace it with an inefficient offensive player and Bucks aren't left with enough offense.
2) Still worried about point of attack defense. The Bucks guards can't stay with good guards. Dame is bad at it and Price isn't much better. Herro embarrassed him. Who is guarding Cleveland's guards?

BigO wrote:The two big problems going forward:
1) Creating offense. With KM, we had an elite shot maker and faciltator. Take that away and replace it with an inefficient offensive player and Bucks aren't left with enough offense.
2) Still worried about point of attack defense. The Bucks guards can't stay with good guards. Dame is bad at it and Prince isn't much better. Herro embarrassed him. Who is guarding Cleveland's guards?
Wonka wrote:It's great to be on board with any trade and support the team, which you are very clearly doing. But it's another thing entirely to continue to state things as objective truth regarding Kuzma when they just aren't true. Kuzma has shown to be most effective leading bench units. He struggles playing off of our stars so far since he's been used to iso ball in Washington for a while. He is nowhere near the playmaker Khris is, and he has most definitely been a 1-6 type of shooter from three since coming here. Both numbers and an eye test back these up.
emunney wrote:SGA is definitely going to win MVP and Jokic deserves to. I don't think Giannis has a real case at this point, if only given the games he's missed. But if I have to win one game, there is no question who I'm taking.
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.
Daver wrote:BigO wrote:The two big problems going forward:
1) Creating offense. With KM, we had an elite shot maker and faciltator. Take that away and replace it with an inefficient offensive player and Bucks aren't left with enough offense.
2) Still worried about point of attack defense. The Bucks guards can't stay with good guards. Dame is bad at it and Prince isn't much better. Herro embarrassed him. Who is guarding Cleveland's guards?
I see so if herro goes out n puts up 40 agsinst holiday or white nothing will be said about holidsy or white i assume.Herro has put up some good games agaist other grest D defending guards whats your point
BigO wrote:Thoughts:
1) Neither Bud or Doc have used Brook the right way on offense. Yesterday was a breath of fresh air. Keep Brook low. Post him up and force teams to adjust, especially when Giannis is off the court.
2) Brook has admirably taken up some of the slack on rebounding and scoring, left by the BP absence. Keep him down low. Use Giannis as a high low tandem.
3) I find it funny that posters praise Kuzma's defense (I think he's been pretty good too), yet the defensive metrics show he's been bad. I shared that just the other day. Shows the flaws of defensive metrics. Either don't use them or use them for everyone.

emunney wrote:SGA is definitely going to win MVP and Jokic deserves to. I don't think Giannis has a real case at this point, if only given the games he's missed. But if I have to win one game, there is no question who I'm taking.
BigO wrote:Thoughts:
1) Neither Bud or Doc have used Brook the right way on offense. Yesterday was a breath of fresh air. Keep Brook low. Post him up and force teams to adjust, especially when Giannis is off the court.
2) Brook has admirably taken up some of the slack on rebounding and scoring, left by the BP absence. Keep him down low. Use Giannis as a high low tandem.
3) I find it funny that posters praise Kuzma's defense (I think he's been pretty good too), yet the defensive metrics show he's been bad. I shared that just the other day. Shows the flaws of defensive metrics. Either don't use them or use them for everyone.
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:ReginaldDwight wrote:Wonka wrote:
Is Kuz a new fan favorite? Would love to know the list of Bucks who can go 5-15 and get a positive nickname around here
He didn't shoot the ball well but 16/9/5 with 1 turnover is a really good night for him.
his defense and energy is having the same impact pj tucker had. i had no idea he could defend like he can. trying to take him off the dribble is a dam chore.
his rebounding and just being able to play the most minutes of everybody with alot of pace and bounce is worth far more than if hed have made a couple extra buckets. i think if you didnt look at the boxscores at all and just watched the game youd never have a problem other than maybe some of the 3's he takes but all the guys shoot dumb 3's.
good stat or bad stat who cares but his net rating of +19 says it all to me
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
AussieBuck wrote:GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:ReginaldDwight wrote:He didn't shoot the ball well but 16/9/5 with 1 turnover is a really good night for him.
his defense and energy is having the same impact pj tucker had. i had no idea he could defend like he can. trying to take him off the dribble is a dam chore.
his rebounding and just being able to play the most minutes of everybody with alot of pace and bounce is worth far more than if hed have made a couple extra buckets. i think if you didnt look at the boxscores at all and just watched the game youd never have a problem other than maybe some of the 3's he takes but all the guys shoot dumb 3's.
good stat or bad stat who cares but his net rating of +19 says it all to me
It just shows that we've been playing with such a slow team. I don't care that much if Kuzma and Porter give us efficient scoring night to night, what they add on D, getting loose balls, cutting, running, rebounding is giving the team another gear.
Dame/Green/KPJ/Kuzma/Giannis is what we need to see next.
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
Dick Tate wrote:Wonka wrote:It's great to be on board with any trade and support the team, which you are very clearly doing. But it's another thing entirely to continue to state things as objective truth regarding Kuzma when they just aren't true. Kuzma has shown to be most effective leading bench units. He struggles playing off of our stars so far since he's been used to iso ball in Washington for a while. He is nowhere near the playmaker Khris is, and he has most definitely been a 1-6 type of shooter from three since coming here. Both numbers and an eye test back these up.
Pretty small sample size there. Last night was the 4th game he's started with Giannis and Dame. The starters together last night were +17.
crkone wrote:AussieBuck wrote:GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
his defense and energy is having the same impact pj tucker had. i had no idea he could defend like he can. trying to take him off the dribble is a dam chore.
his rebounding and just being able to play the most minutes of everybody with alot of pace and bounce is worth far more than if hed have made a couple extra buckets. i think if you didnt look at the boxscores at all and just watched the game youd never have a problem other than maybe some of the 3's he takes but all the guys shoot dumb 3's.
good stat or bad stat who cares but his net rating of +19 says it all to me
It just shows that we've been playing with such a slow team. I don't care that much if Kuzma and Porter give us efficient scoring night to night, what they add on D, getting loose balls, cutting, running, rebounding is giving the team another gear.
Dame/Green/KPJ/Kuzma/Giannis is what we need to see next.
Yeah my issue is when the Giannis/Dame two man game gets going one of the guys standing in the corner is Kuzma. His man will help out and then you need him to make a shot. I've seen too many failures in the playoffs because the Bucks couldn't hit a three and they'll be going at some fantastic three point shooting teams. They'll need to keep up and I don't trust Doc to put them in the right positions.
blazza18 wrote:emunney wrote:SGA is definitely going to win MVP and Jokic deserves to. I don't think Giannis has a real case at this point, if only given the games he's missed. But if I have to win one game, there is no question who I'm taking.
Jokic