What teams would want Redd and could get him?

WEFFPIM · Post #41 » by **WEFFPIM** » Wed Jan 9, 2008 9:41 pm

DannoMac20 wrote:Yet a backcourt of Devin Harris (6'3") and Jason Terry (6'2") made it to the Finals in 2006.

Gonna go out on a limb and say that the backcourt wasn't the reason why the Mavericks got to the Finals

jerrod · Post #42 » by **jerrod** » Wed Jan 9, 2008 10:07 pm

WEFFPIM wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Gonna go out on a limb and say that the backcourt wasn't the reason why the Mavericks got to the Finals

he didn't say it was, just that it had happened

xTitan · Post #43 » by **xTitan** » Wed Jan 9, 2008 10:07 pm

DannoMac20 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Yet a backcourt of Devin Harris (6'3") and Jason Terry (6'2") made it to the Finals in 2006.

Stackhouse was paired more with them then they were together, is my recollection....but you bring up a point.

pasting_monkeys · Post #44 » by **pasting_monkeys** » Wed Jan 9, 2008 10:58 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:Redd for Artest and Salmons with Redd playing SF in Sacramento.

I'd prefer other deals but this one I might gamble on....I think Artest is crazy and like Ruben in many ways....but he is a top 15 talent when in the right situation......

Salmons can give you firepower at the SG or SF spots and his contract is a bargain.

Yes, yes... and yes again. But the key is whether Artest would consider Milwaukee 'the right situation'.

Simulack · Post #45 » by **Simulack** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:37 am

I posted some Hinrich/Redd trades a few weeks back. I actually think that a Mo/Hinrich back court could work pretty well. Hinrich's certianly capable of defending the 2 spot. What about:

Michael Redd and CV for Hinrich, Tyrus Thomas (or Noah), Thabo and filler (Griffin and Khryapa work)

Works on the trade checker. We don't get a star but we get a defensive minded combo guard to pair with Mo in our back court. Now we've got a lot less money invested there (Kirk's contract is also front loaded). We swap CV for a prospect whose potential is mostly on the defensive side of the ball and arguably complements our team better.

Anyone like it?

smauss · Post #46 » by **smauss** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:58 am

Simulack wrote:I posted some Hinrich/Redd trades a few weeks back. I actually think that a Mo/Hinrich back court could work pretty well. Hinrich's certianly capable of defending the 2 spot. What about:

Michael Redd and CV for Hinrich, Tyrus Thomas (or Noah), Thabo and filler (Griffin and Khryapa work)

Works on the trade checker. We don't get a star but we get a defensive minded combo guard to pair with Mo in our back court. Now we've got a lot less money invested there (Kirk's contract is also front loaded). We swap CV for a prospect whose potential is mostly on the defensive side of the ball and arguably complements our team better.

Anyone like it?

I hate Noah! I don't irrationally hate many people but I do him.

Post #47 » by **paulpressey25** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 6:18 am

Simulack wrote:I posted some Hinrich/Redd trades a few weeks back.

I like anything with the Bulls where we get one of their top three players and then another of their top 7 players back.

Redd/CV for Hinrich/Noah/Thabo works fine....I'd prefer Noah over Tyrus Thomas actually....

Luke...I still can't see Atlanta making sense from the Hawks perspective. Horford is untouchable. Dale Davis was a good player but not an 11/11 guy right out of the blocks like Horford. The bigger issue is salary. They already have Joe Johnson playing Redd's spot and making max. Josh Smith will be getting $12mm+ next year....they can't afford to take on Redd's $16mm next season.

El Duderino · Post #48 » by **El Duderino** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:13 am

I like anything with the Bulls where we get one of their top three players and then another of their top 7 players back.

Redd/CV for Hinrich/Noah/Thabo works fine....I'd prefer Noah over Tyrus Thomas actually

I fail to see how this makes sense for the Bulls. They lose their PG and add a second high scoring SG that doesn't play defense. Sure they would still have Duhon, but he's not starter material.

Luke...I still can't see Atlanta making sense from the Hawks perspective. Horford is untouchable. Dale Davis was a good player but not an 11/11 guy right out of the blocks like Horford. The bigger issue is salary. They already have Joe Johnson playing Redd's spot and making max. Josh Smith will be getting $12mm+ next year....they can't afford to take on Redd's $16mm next season.

I see zero need for Redd with the Hawks. They already have a very good and expensive SG, why add a second one?