Bucks Reject Knicks

MrLynch07 · Post #1 » by **MrLynch07** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:19 pm

So apparently this is how the trade was sopposed to go down but Harris rejected it.

Milwaukee Gives up CV, Gadz, and Simmons, for Randolph and Renaldo Balkman.

Thank god that didn't go down.

http://www.fannation.com/truth_and_rumors/nba#

mnstinks · Post #2 » by **mnstinks** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:21 pm

Lincoln shot

EastSideBucksFan · Post #3 » by **EastSideBucksFan** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:22 pm

http://www.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic. ... sc&start=0

Newz · Post #4 » by **Newz** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:22 pm

I didn't know Balkman was involved...

That makes the deal very appealing though. I am a huge fan of Balkman. Athletic 3 who can guard 4 positions. :droop:

xTitan · Post #5 » by **xTitan** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:47 pm

LukePliska wrote:I didn't know Balkman was involved...

That makes the deal very appealing though. I am a huge fan of Balkman. Athletic 3 who can guard 4 positions.

Have absolutely no desire to pick up a cancer with a bad contract just to get a role playing #3.

icat2000 · Post #6 » by **icat2000** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:52 pm

Bucks need some assistance but are not desperate enough to take that.

Paytonkidd · Post #7 » by **Paytonkidd** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:01 pm

I actually like that trade. Bucks have too many nice guys. We are trying to win a championship not Mr. Congeniality.

MrLynch07 · Post #8 » by **MrLynch07** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:15 pm

My bad, i didnt know this was already discussed, you can lock it if u wish.

jerrod · Post #9 » by **jerrod** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:37 pm

MrLynch07 wrote:My bad, i didnt know this was already discussed, you can lock it if u wish.

i think the idea was discussed, but not what was actually offered
EDIT: except for that 4 page thread at the top

i wouldn't do this either, we do not need randolph and the truck full of problems he travels with

ctorres · Post #10 » by **ctorres** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:30 pm

I like the idea of playing Yi at the 3, Randolph at the 4, Bogut at the 5.

Baddy Chuck · Post #11 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:23 pm

I dont like that we turned it down. Pretty much we get a a TALENTED cancer and a TALENTED athletic young 3 (which we need bad) for a 7 million dollar DNP, a good but underachieving no defense power forward, and a disapointing overpayed shooter.