ImageImage

Blowouts (The Porter and Stotts Appreciation Thread)

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
schweig
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,672
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 30, 2007

 

Post#41 » by schweig » Sat Feb 2, 2008 1:15 am

I know this is turning into a Stotts debate but I want to pick on something else about LK. I remember a while back, he was talking about instant replay, and now that I just looked at the Wed game report I see he'd like some more consistency between the amount of contact allowed inside v. on the perimeter.

While I agree with those, especially the double standard for contact (although I would rather see the perimeter come closer to matching the paint again and not the other way around), it's funny to me that Mr. First Year Coach is talking about fixing the league before he fixes his team.

Maybe he's just meant to serve the whole game and not only the Bucks. I expect some bright new ideas over the next few months about how to keep close games from becoming foulfests. Shave ten minutes off the average and maybe they can look at your replay plan a little more closely.
User avatar
THE DINJ
Starter
Posts: 2,005
And1: 121
Joined: Jun 25, 2006
Location: Madison, WI
   

 

Post#42 » by THE DINJ » Sat Feb 2, 2008 2:46 am

Also note that there are no 40-pt losses on there until this year (2).

Pathetic.
User avatar
Buck You
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,555
And1: 541
Joined: Jul 24, 2006
Location: Illinois
     

 

Post#43 » by Buck You » Sat Feb 2, 2008 6:45 am

Loosing by 40 in the NBA is inexcusable. That's a total lack of effort and if LK isn't making them run around the Bradley Center 10 times I seriously question his intelligence.
Max Green
RealGM
Posts: 16,324
And1: 4,715
Joined: Jul 04, 2007
Location: Heelville
 

 

Post#44 » by Max Green » Sat Feb 2, 2008 6:54 am

We never lost by 40 with Terry Porter as our coach. Matter of fact he had one of the worst Bucks rosters in the last 10 years (04/05) and we never got beat that bad, nor did our team ever lack effort. We weren't very good, but atleast we played hard every game.
Vice President of Parker-Nation.
#Jabariunleashed
#OwnTheFuture
:wizard: Maxtradamus
User avatar
WEFFPIM
RealGM
Posts: 38,521
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.
   

Re: Blowouts (The Porter and Stotts Appreciation Thread) 

Post#45 » by WEFFPIM » Sat Feb 2, 2008 8:05 am

milweskee wrote:Scariest thing...our season isn't over. :banghead:


I can one up ya. Larry K's contract has a few more years left on it.
ReddWing wrote:Being a fan of this team is tantamount to being in hell...There is no Christ that is coming to save us. Even if there was, we'd trade him for a 28 year old wing.
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,519
And1: 29,518
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

 

Post#46 » by paulpressey25 » Sat Feb 2, 2008 2:54 pm

I believe Larry K. only has one more year on his contract. And it isn't at big dollars.....
Bucks_Revenge
Banned User
Posts: 7,978
And1: 1
Joined: Oct 13, 2004

 

Post#47 » by Bucks_Revenge » Sat Feb 2, 2008 3:00 pm

MVP4Champ wrote:We never lost by 40 with Terry Porter as our coach. Matter of fact he had one of the worst Bucks rosters in the last 10 years (04/05) and we never got beat that bad, nor did our team ever lack effort. We weren't very good, but atleast we played hard every game.



this is my point why Porter was a good coach and that we should of kept him here ...I really feel if he was still coach we will be a top 5 team in the east.
Epicurus
RealGM
Posts: 15,490
And1: 872
Joined: Jan 25, 2006

 

Post#48 » by Epicurus » Sat Feb 2, 2008 4:22 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:I believe Larry K. only has one more year on his contract. And it isn't at big dollars.....


I thought LK got a 4 year contract. I could be wrong, however; but reasonably sure it was for more than 2 (not counting the replacement time).
User avatar
worthlessBucks
RealGM
Posts: 22,566
And1: 4,932
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Bucks Logo
   

 

Post#49 » by worthlessBucks » Sat Feb 2, 2008 4:23 pm

I thought it was 3 with the issue being if the remainder of last year counted as a year. I'm not sure on that.
Go Bucks!
User avatar
WEFFPIM
RealGM
Posts: 38,521
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.
   

 

Post#50 » by WEFFPIM » Sat Feb 2, 2008 4:27 pm

I know the contract was 4 total years, not sure if the end of last season counted as 1 of them
ReddWing wrote:Being a fan of this team is tantamount to being in hell...There is no Christ that is coming to save us. Even if there was, we'd trade him for a 28 year old wing.
Kablooie
Sophomore
Posts: 133
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 09, 2008

 

Post#51 » by Kablooie » Sat Feb 2, 2008 4:56 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:People forget that Stotts one "big" year the team had a heck of a lot more talent on it (Kukoc, Joe Smith, TJ, Magloire) and still only got to 40-wins.


Man, what team wouldn't be able to perform with an all star cast like that?

It's hard to decide who out of those guys was the best. Was it the 50 year old, one of the NBA's biggest disappointments, the little guy that was rusty coming back from an injury where he was almost crippled for over an entire season, or the guy whose second double double stat was almost turnovers?

With talent evaluation like that I don't think Mo and Redd fans have too much to worry about when you criticize them.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks