ImageImage

TI---MIL/CHI

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
raferfenix
RealGM
Posts: 24,091
And1: 4,451
Joined: Apr 05, 2003

TI---MIL/CHI 

Post#1 » by raferfenix » Mon Feb 11, 2008 8:19 am

I doubt i'm the only one who's desperatley hoping for a trade as our team's play continues to be vomit worthy (how did we lose to the knicks by the way).


Bucks trade: Michael Redd, Charlie Villanueva, Dan Gadzuric
Bulls trade: Luol Deng, Ben Wallace, Chris Duhon


The Bulls are really looking to move Wallace, but they would also have to believe Redd woudl be an incredible piece for them to do this trade. It also would have to be the case that they do not want to invest huge money in Luol Deng considering their roster isn't working and they have Andres Nocioni at SF already.

For the Bucks, it's a no-brianer deal to me. Unfortuantely, we have Herb Kohl as our GM though...[/quote]
User avatar
Nowak008
RealGM
Posts: 14,588
And1: 4,303
Joined: Jul 07, 2006
Location: Book Publisher
Contact:

 

Post#2 » by Nowak008 » Mon Feb 11, 2008 8:44 am

The Bulls didn't want to deal deng for Gasol there is no way they deal him for Redd.
Image
John Hammond apologists:
emunney wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters


THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,685
And1: 27,269
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#3 » by trwi7 » Mon Feb 11, 2008 8:45 am

I think the trade deadline might be raferfenix's Christmas.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
magpies
Senior
Posts: 585
And1: 0
Joined: May 15, 2007

 

Post#4 » by magpies » Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:49 am

Deng would not be traded, Gordon yes but then he leaves in the off season, so this trade which wold be good with either Deng or Gordon won't happen
User avatar
jimmy_n13
Junior
Posts: 332
And1: 15
Joined: Apr 21, 2005

 

Post#5 » by jimmy_n13 » Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:04 am

No way Chicago would trade them (and even if they did would there be issues signing them in the offseason?)


I didn't want to start another thread b/c i'm not sure whether this idea is stupid or not. Would LAC do Redd and maybe a pick for Cassell and Mobley. Would we want to do it? We could then play Cassell PG and Mo play a SG and backup PG with Mobley also playing SG. Just throwin it out there.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,685
And1: 27,269
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#6 » by trwi7 » Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:20 am

jimmy_n13 wrote:Would LAC do Redd and maybe a pick for Cassell and Mobley. Would we want to do it? We could then play Cassell PG and Mo play a SG and backup PG with Mobley also playing SG. Just throwin it out there.


Uhh LAC would jump at that even without the pick. We better be the ones getting the pick.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
DH34Phan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,627
And1: 114
Joined: Jun 30, 2005
Contact:

 

Post#7 » by DH34Phan » Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:32 am

trwi7 wrote:I think the trade deadline might be raferfenix's Christmas.

I take offense to that. :wavefinger:

Remember that week I was binging on trade threads?!?
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,685
And1: 27,269
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#8 » by trwi7 » Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:34 am

DH34Phan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


I take offense to that. :wavefinger:

Remember that week I was binging on trade threads?!?


Binging is cool. Just ask Nicole Richie.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
jeremyd236
General Manager
Posts: 7,927
And1: 16
Joined: Jan 07, 2005
Location: Appleton, WI

 

Post#9 » by jeremyd236 » Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:16 pm

I'm sure the Bulls would love a 3 guard rotation of Hinrich, Gordon, and Redd.

Gordon and Redd really complement eachother's game.

[/sarcasm]
User avatar
drew881
RealGM
Posts: 12,682
And1: 5,484
Joined: Aug 14, 2007

 

Post#10 » by drew881 » Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:36 pm

Seems like Bulls fans in the trade forum are willing to give up Nocioni for NOTHING. What happened? I know we are pretty high on him here.
pilprin
Pro Prospect
Posts: 934
And1: 127
Joined: Jul 12, 2002

 

Post#11 » by pilprin » Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:18 am

I would love to get Nocioni and Duhon. I don't know what it would cost us but I'd like to see both of them in Mil. If not Nocioni, I'd like to see Tyrus Thomas.

The BYC in Nocioni's deal makes it difficult to match up in a trade checker.
User avatar
raferfenix
RealGM
Posts: 24,091
And1: 4,451
Joined: Apr 05, 2003

 

Post#12 » by raferfenix » Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:16 am

I based this trade idea on the premise that the Bulls are desperate to drop Ben Wallace. If that's the case I doubt they can get a player like Redd or any other impact player without giving up some serious value as well.

It is a good point that the bulls were not willing to trade Deng for Gasol a year ago, but a whole lot has changed since then. Most notably, the question of how much Deng is worht to the Bulls? I thought of this trade when Bulls fans cited that they might just give away Nocioni in order to ensure that they can resign Deng, and I can see the Bulls prefering to get an impact player and dramatically more cap flexibilty at the expense of Deng rather than that.

It is also a good point that Gordon is hardly a good compliment to Redd. However, after their sorry season I have a hard time seeing the Bulls committing big money to Gordon regardless. This trade would give the Bulls the ultimate negotiating position of not needing to give him big money while also being able to sign and trade him if htey prefer it.


I think the Bucks are one of very few teams willing to take on Ben Wallace. I'd be eccstatic if we could do a Nocioni based deal like this as well:

Bucks trade: CV, Simmons, Gadz, Voshkul
Bulls trade: Nocioni, Wallace
pilprin
Pro Prospect
Posts: 934
And1: 127
Joined: Jul 12, 2002

 

Post#13 » by pilprin » Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:47 am

I'd do that, but I really want Duhon as well. I think he would be an excellent PG especially if Harris is set on keeping Redd. Mo then could be dealt.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks