I doubt i'm the only one who's desperatley hoping for a trade as our team's play continues to be vomit worthy (how did we lose to the knicks by the way).
Bucks trade: Michael Redd, Charlie Villanueva, Dan Gadzuric
Bulls trade: Luol Deng, Ben Wallace, Chris Duhon
The Bulls are really looking to move Wallace, but they would also have to believe Redd woudl be an incredible piece for them to do this trade. It also would have to be the case that they do not want to invest huge money in Luol Deng considering their roster isn't working and they have Andres Nocioni at SF already.
For the Bucks, it's a no-brianer deal to me. Unfortuantely, we have Herb Kohl as our GM though...[/quote]
TI---MIL/CHI
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
- jimmy_n13
- Junior
- Posts: 332
- And1: 15
- Joined: Apr 21, 2005
No way Chicago would trade them (and even if they did would there be issues signing them in the offseason?)
I didn't want to start another thread b/c i'm not sure whether this idea is stupid or not. Would LAC do Redd and maybe a pick for Cassell and Mobley. Would we want to do it? We could then play Cassell PG and Mo play a SG and backup PG with Mobley also playing SG. Just throwin it out there.
I didn't want to start another thread b/c i'm not sure whether this idea is stupid or not. Would LAC do Redd and maybe a pick for Cassell and Mobley. Would we want to do it? We could then play Cassell PG and Mo play a SG and backup PG with Mobley also playing SG. Just throwin it out there.
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,685
- And1: 27,269
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
jimmy_n13 wrote:Would LAC do Redd and maybe a pick for Cassell and Mobley. Would we want to do it? We could then play Cassell PG and Mo play a SG and backup PG with Mobley also playing SG. Just throwin it out there.
Uhh LAC would jump at that even without the pick. We better be the ones getting the pick.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,685
- And1: 27,269
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
DH34Phan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I take offense to that.![]()
Remember that week I was binging on trade threads?!?
Binging is cool. Just ask Nicole Richie.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
- raferfenix
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,091
- And1: 4,451
- Joined: Apr 05, 2003
I based this trade idea on the premise that the Bulls are desperate to drop Ben Wallace. If that's the case I doubt they can get a player like Redd or any other impact player without giving up some serious value as well.
It is a good point that the bulls were not willing to trade Deng for Gasol a year ago, but a whole lot has changed since then. Most notably, the question of how much Deng is worht to the Bulls? I thought of this trade when Bulls fans cited that they might just give away Nocioni in order to ensure that they can resign Deng, and I can see the Bulls prefering to get an impact player and dramatically more cap flexibilty at the expense of Deng rather than that.
It is also a good point that Gordon is hardly a good compliment to Redd. However, after their sorry season I have a hard time seeing the Bulls committing big money to Gordon regardless. This trade would give the Bulls the ultimate negotiating position of not needing to give him big money while also being able to sign and trade him if htey prefer it.
I think the Bucks are one of very few teams willing to take on Ben Wallace. I'd be eccstatic if we could do a Nocioni based deal like this as well:
Bucks trade: CV, Simmons, Gadz, Voshkul
Bulls trade: Nocioni, Wallace
It is a good point that the bulls were not willing to trade Deng for Gasol a year ago, but a whole lot has changed since then. Most notably, the question of how much Deng is worht to the Bulls? I thought of this trade when Bulls fans cited that they might just give away Nocioni in order to ensure that they can resign Deng, and I can see the Bulls prefering to get an impact player and dramatically more cap flexibilty at the expense of Deng rather than that.
It is also a good point that Gordon is hardly a good compliment to Redd. However, after their sorry season I have a hard time seeing the Bulls committing big money to Gordon regardless. This trade would give the Bulls the ultimate negotiating position of not needing to give him big money while also being able to sign and trade him if htey prefer it.
I think the Bucks are one of very few teams willing to take on Ben Wallace. I'd be eccstatic if we could do a Nocioni based deal like this as well:
Bucks trade: CV, Simmons, Gadz, Voshkul
Bulls trade: Nocioni, Wallace