The trade I want to see: MIL/MEM

[EastSideBucksFan]

[quote="Nowak008"][/quote]



Do you guys understand I'm basing these offers off the recently reported deal that they are allegedly considering?


Mike Miller for Bostjan Nachbar and Jamaal Magloire...no firsts

[Nowak008]

-= original quote snipped =-





Do you guys understand I'm basing these offers off the recently reported deal that they are allegedly considering?


Mike Miller for Bostjan Nachbar and Jamaal Magloire...no firsts

hmm for some reason I thought a first would be involved. If the Nets pull off that trade I'll be upset we didn't get in on Miller.

[europa]

-= original quote snipped =-





Do you guys understand I'm basing these offers off the recently reported deal that they are allegedly considering?


Mike Miller for Bostjan Nachbar and Jamaal Magloire...no firsts

This is something I keep going back to - people seem to be forgetting that so few trades are made value for value anymore. I posted the other day that we've now seen several future Hall of Famers traded (or tried to be traded in Kidd's case) in the last year and none of the teams that traded them got equal value back with the exception of Miami in the Shaq deal. So saying the Grizzlies or any other team would want more for so and so may simply not be true. Teams are selling on the cheap constantly these days. That's one reason why I'd like to see the Bucks get in on some of this guys. Guys like Lowry, Hinrich and Miller might be had for less than full value. The Bucks are stuck because they don't have good expirings which is what many teams want but if the value return isn't high they can at least get in the mix.

[El Duderino]

-= original quote snipped =-



This is something I keep going back to - people seem to be forgetting that so few trades are made value for value anymore. I posted the other day that we've now seen several future Hall of Famers traded (or tried to be traded in Kidd's case) in the last year and none of the teams that traded them got equal value back with the exception of Miami in the Shaq deal. So saying the Grizzlies or any other team would want more for so and so may simply not be true. Teams are selling on the cheap constantly these days. That's one reason why I'd like to see the Bucks get in on some of this guys. Guys like Lowry, Hinrich and Miller might be had for less than full value. The Bucks are stuck because they don't have good expirings which is what many teams want but if the value return isn't high they can at least get in the mix.

That's the whole key though, expiring contracts.

Plus, for a guy like Lowry, he makes peanuts, thus they don't have to move him for poor value to save money.

Hinrich might be available if the Bulls wanted to move in a different direction, but i'm at a loss to see what we have that they'd like and works money wise.

We have no big expiring to include. We aren't trading away our draft pick. We'd need to send about 10 million back there way and none of our garbage contracts would appeal to them. That leaves either Mo or Redd. I don't see them trading Hinrich for Mo. Redd doesn't look to be a good fit given they have Gordan and Redd's max contract.