Bogutneedsball wrote:Anyone else think Jim Todd is completely hammered every time you see him?

Yes. I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks so

Stopshere2 wrote:Jim: we try to hold them accountable. But these are the guys we have. Us coaches maybe need to do a better job. But no matter how bad it gets, like Michael Redd says often, we've got to stick together. Can't point fingers at each other.
Uh oh.
I don't think saying that is a terrible thing at all, but I remember a bunch of people taking issue with that kind of comment when Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld made it. Let's not turn this into a political thread (I thought about not mentioning it but it is too similar so I couldn't help it) but I'm guessing I'm not the only one that saw the parallel there.
Stopshere2 wrote:Jim: I don't think it will help. Chemistry is not that bad [damned by faint praise here], In Toronto we had great chemistry, great guys; these are good guys, good people, just not jelling together as a group. There are no fist fights at practice, coaches are not going off at players.
no fist fights at practice + coaches not going off at players = chemistry being not that bad
Great metric.
Stopshere2 wrote:Caller 3, Chris: What about defence?
Jim: senator gets on the coaches every time, "you better have a better defensive FG%."
Why is Senator Kohl getting on the coaches about anything? I mean, I know this to be true and have for some time, but it just brings it to the surface when an assistant coach mentions this on the air while on the radio. The GM is supposed to be the guy who should be "getting on the coaches" if that needs to be done. If the owner is to "get on" anyone it should be the owner getting on the GM.